International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 252–259 | Cite as

Dyadic Goal Appraisal During Treatment for Infertility: How Do Different Perspectives Relate to Partners' Adjustment?

  • Elizabeth H. Thompson
  • Julia T. Woodward
  • Annette L. Stanton
Article

Abstract

Background

Infertility often is a dyadic stressor that constitutes blockage of a major life goal.

Purpose

This study's primary aims were to examine heterosexual partners' goal appraisals during treatment for infertility and to test whether the direct effects of and interactions between partners' goal-related perceptions were associated with each partner's adjustment.

Method

Women (n = 37) receiving fertility treatment and their male partners (n = 37) completed measures of goal appraisal and psychological adjustment.

Results

Partners did not differ on ratings of the importance of the goal of parenthood, but women indicated lower perceived chance of becoming pregnant and higher perceived goal blockage than their partners. Goal appraisals were moderately correlated between partners and uncorrelated with the number of treatment procedures undergone by the couple. Women reported greater depressive symptoms, more infertility-specific thought intrusion, and lower positive states of mind than their partners. Women's appraisal of greater likelihood of becoming pregnant was psychologically protective, but greater perceived likelihood of becoming pregnant reported by their partners was associated with women's negative psychological adjustment.

Conclusion

Examining the associations between couples' goal appraisals and psychological adjustment may aid in developing targeted interventions to promote psychological adjustment to infertility. The small sample may have prevented identifying interactions between partners' goal assessment measures.

Keywords

Goal appraisal Infertility Couple Dyadic stressor Psychological adjustment 

References

  1. 1.
    Heckhausen J, Wrosch C, Schulz R. A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychol Rev. 2010;117:32–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kraaij V, Garnefski N, Schroevers MJ. Coping, goal adjustment, and positive and negative affect in definitive infertility. J Health Psychol. 2009;14:18–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kraaij V, Garnefski N, Schroevers MJ, Weijmer J, Helmerhorst F. Cognitive coping, goal adjustment, and depressive and anxiety symptoms in people undergoing infertility treatment: a prospective study. J Health Psychol. 2010;15:876–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miller GE, Wrosch C. You've gotta know when to fold 'em: goal disengagement and systemic inflammation in adolescence. Psychol Sci. 2007;18:773–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Suikkari A, Salmela-Aro K. Letting go of your dreams–adjustment of child-related goal appraisals and depressive symptoms during infertility treatment. J Res Pers. 2008;424:988–1003.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thompson EH, Woodward JT, Stanton AL. Moving forward during major goal blockage: situational goal adjustment in women facing infertility. J Behav Med. 2011 (in press). Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21222027. Accessed 2011 Feb 14.
  7. 7.
    Wrosch C, Miller GE, Scheier MF, de Pontet SB. Giving up on unattainable goals: benefits for health? Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007;33:251–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wrosch C, Scheier MF, Carver CS, Schulz R. The importance of goal disengagement in adaptive self-regulation: when giving up is beneficial. Self and Identity. 2003;2:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wrosch C, Scheier MF, Miller GE, Schulz R, Carver CS. Adaptive self-regulation of unattainable goals: goal disengagement, goal reengagement, and subjective well-being. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003;29:1494–508.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wrosch C. Self-regulation of unattainable goals and pathways to quality of life. In: Folkman S, editor. The Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001. p. 319–33.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fitzsimons GM, Finkel EJ. Interpersonal influences on self-regulation. Curr Dir Psych Sci. 2010;19:101–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clark LF, Henry SM, Taylor DM. Cognitive examination of motivation for childbearing as a factor in adjustment to infertility. In: Stanton AL, Dunkel-Schetter C, editors. Infertility: perspectives from stress and coping research. New York: Plenum Press; 1991. p. 157–80.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Benyamini Y, Gozlan M, Kokia E. Women's and men's perceptions of infertility and their associations with psychological adjustment: a dyadic approach. Br J Health Psychol. 2009;14:1–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kowalcek I, Kasimzade T, Huber G. Expectations for success in fertility treatment involving assisted reproduction. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003;268:78–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stanton AL, Tennen H, Affleck G, Mendola R. Cognitive appraisal and adjustment to infertility. Women Health. 1991;17:1–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    van Balen F, Trimbos-Kemper TC. Involuntarily childless couples: their desire to have children and their motives. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;16:137–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berghuis JP, Stanton AL. Adjustment to a dyadic stressor: a longitudinal study of coping and depressive symptoms in infertile couples over an insemination attempt. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70:433–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peterson BD, Pirritano M, Christensen U, Schmidt L. The impact of partner coping in couples experiencing infertility. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1128–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Radloff LS. The use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in adolescents and young adults. J Youth Adolesc. 1991;4:149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med. 1979;41:209–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Horowitz M, Adler N, Kegeles S. A scale for measuring the occurrence of positive states of mind: a preliminary report. Psychosom Med. 1988;50:477–483.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stanton AL, Woodward JT. Infertility. In: Ayers S, Baum A, McManus C, Newman S, Wallston K, Weinman J, West R, editors. Cambridge handbook of psychology, health, and medicine. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 756–8.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Verhaak C, Smeenk J, Evers A, Kremer J, Kraaimaat F, Braat D. Women’s emotional adjustment to IVF: a systematic review of 25 years of research. Hum Reprod Update. 2006; 13:27–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth H. Thompson
    • 1
  • Julia T. Woodward
    • 2
  • Annette L. Stanton
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Los Angeles, CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical CenterDuke Fertility CenterDurhamUSA
  3. 3.UCLA Department of PsychologyLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations