International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 199–208 | Cite as

Changes in Physical Functioning in the Active Living Every Day Program of the Active for Life Initiative®

  • Meghan Baruth
  • Sara Wilcox
  • Stacy Wegley
  • David M. Buchner
  • Marcia G. Ory
  • Alisa Phillips
  • Karen Schwamberger
  • Terry L. Bazzarre
Article

Abstract

Background

Physical activity can prevent or delay the onset of physical functional limitations in older adults. There are limited data that evidence-based physical activity interventions can be successfully translated into community programs and result in similar benefits for physical functioning.

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to measure the effects of the Active Living Every Day program on physical functioning and physical functional limitations in a diverse sample of older adults.

Methods

As a part of the Active for Life initiative, the Council on Aging of Southwestern Ohio implemented Active Living Every Day (ALED), a group-based lifestyle behavior change program designed to increase physical activity. Performance-based physical functioning tests (30-s Chair Stand Test, eight Foot Up-and-Go Test, Chair Sit-and-Reach Test, 30-Foot Walk Test) were administered to participants at baseline and posttest. Baseline to post-program changes in physical functioning and impairment status were examined with repeated measures analysis of covariance. Interactions tested whether change over time differed according to race/ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), and baseline impairment status.

Results

Participants significantly increased their performance in all four physical functioning tests. The percentage of participants classified as “impaired” according to normative data significantly decreased over time. Physical functioning improved regardless of BMI, race/ethnicity, or baseline impairment status.

Conclusions

ALED is an example of an evidenced-based physical activity program that can be successfully translated into community programs and result in significant and clinically meaningful improvements in performance-based measures of physical functioning.

Keywords

Physical activity Exercise Translational research Behavioral intervention 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The Active for Life (AFL) initiative was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation or other institutions affiliated with the authors.

We gratefully acknowledge the many participants who took part in the Active for Life program and evaluation at the Council on Aging of Southwestern Ohio. We also acknowledge the involvement and significant contribution of staff from Council on Aging of Southwestern Ohio, Hamilton County Public Health, Human Kinetics, Inc, Texas A&M Health Science Center, and the University of South Carolina. We thank the National Advisory Committee for its valuable contributions to Active for Life. Finally, we thank Dr. Jessie Jones for her training and consultation in the functional fitness tests.

References

  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Healthy aging—improving and extending quality of life among older Americans: at a glance. 2009. [http://www.cdc.gov/NCCdphp/publications/aag/pdf/healthy_aging.pdf]. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
  2. 2.
    Nelson ME, Layne JE, Bernstein MJ, Nuernberger A, Castaneda C, Kaliton D, et al. The effects of multidimensional home-based exercise on functional performance in elderly people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59:154–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    LIFE Study Investigators. Effects of a physical activity intervention on measures of physical performance: results of the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders Pilot (LIFE-P). J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61:1157–65.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN, Duncan PW, Judge JO, King AC, et al. Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:1435–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:181–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey data. Atlanta, Georgia: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2007.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rejeski WJ, Marsh AP, Chmelo E, Prescott AJ, Dobrosielski M, Walkup MP, et al. The Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders Pilot (LIFE-P): 2-year follow-up. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;64:462–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ettinger WH, Jr., Burns R, Messier SP, Applegate W, Rejeski WJ, Morgan T, Shumaker S, Berry MJ, O'Toole M, et al. A randomized trial comparing aerobic exercise and resistance exercise with a health education program in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. The Fitness Arthritis and Seniors Trial (FAST). JAMA. 1997; 277:25-31.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Toraman NF, Erman A, Agyar E. Effects of multicomponent training on functional fitness in older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2004;12:538–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Takeshima N, Rogers NL, Rogers ME, Islam MM, Koizumi D, Lee S. Functional fitness gain varies in older adults depending on exercise mode. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:2036–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morey MC, Peterson MJ, Pieper CF, Sloane R, Crowley GM, Cowper PA, et al. The Veterans Learning to Improve Fitness and Function in Elders Study: a randomized trial of primary care-based physical activity counseling for older men. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57:1166–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fitzpatrick SE, Reddy S, Lommel TS, Fischer JG, Speer EM, Stephens H, et al. Physical activity and physical function improved following a community-based intervention in older adults in Georgia senior centers. J Nutr Elder. 2008;27:135–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yamauchi T, Islam, M.M., Koizumi, D., Rogers, M.E., Rogers, N.L., & Takeshima, N. Effect of home-based well-rounded exercise in community-dwelling older adults. J Sports Sci & Med. 2005;4:563-71.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cress ME, Buchner DM, Questad KA, Esselman PC, deLateur BJ, Schwartz RS. Exercise: effects on physical functional performance in independent older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999;54:M242–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Belza B, Shumway-Cook A, Phelan EA, Snyder S, LoGrefo JP. The effects of a community-based exercise program on function and health in older adults: The EnhanceFitness Program. J Appl Gerontol. 2006;25:291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kalapotharakos VI, Michalopoulos M, Strimpakos N, Diamantopoulos K, Tokmakidis SP. Functional and neuromotor performance in older adults: effect of 12 weeks of aerobic exercise. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85:61–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simons R, Andel R. The effects of resistance training and walking on functional fitness in advanced old age. J Aging Health. 2006;18:91–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee report. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wilcox S, Dowda M, Leviton LC, Bartlett-Prescott J, Bazzarre T, Campbell-Voytal K, et al. Active for life final results from the translation of two physical activity programs. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35:340–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilcox S, Dowda M, Griffin SF, Rheaume C, Ory MG, Leviton L, et al. Results of the first year of active for life: translation of 2 evidence-based physical activity programs for older adults into community settings. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:1201–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    King AC, Baumann K, O'Sullivan P, Wilcox S, Castro C. Effects of moderate-intensity exercise on physiological, behavioral, and emotional responses to family caregiving: a randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57:M26–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    King AC, Pruitt LA, Phillips W, Oka R, Rodenburg A, Haskell WL. Comparative effects of two physical activity programs on measured and perceived physical functioning and other health-related quality of life outcomes in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55:M74–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    King AC, Haskell WL, Young DR, Oka RK, Stefanick ML. Long-term effects of varying intensities and formats of physical activity on participation rates, fitness, and lipoproteins in men and women aged 50 to 65 years. Circulation. 1995;91:2596–604.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dunn AL, Marcus BH, Kampert JB, Garcia ME, Kohl HW, 3rd, Blair SN. Reduction in cardiovascular disease risk factors: 6-month results from Project Active. Prev Med. 1997 Nov-Dec;26:883-92.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dunn AL, Marcus BH, Kampert JB, Garcia ME, Kohl HW, Blair SN. Comparison of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness: a randomized trial. JAMA. 1999;281:327–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1986.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992;47:1102–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rikli REJ, C.J.,. Senior fitness test manual. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2001.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stewart AL, Mills KM, King AC, Haskell WL, Gillis D, Ritter PL. CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: outcomes for interventions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:1126–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Harada ND, Chiu V, King AC, Stewart AL. An evaluation of three self-report physical activity instruments for older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:962–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stewart AL, Mills KM, Sepsis PG, King AC, McLellan BY, Roitz K, Ritter PL. Evaluation of CHAMPS, a physical activity promotion program for older adults. Ann Behav Med. 1997 Fall;19:353-61.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stewart AL, Verboncoeur CJ, McLellan BY, Gillis DE, Rush S, Mills KM, et al. Physical activity outcomes of CHAMPS II: a physical activity promotion program for older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M465–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stewart AL. Community-based physical activity programs for adults age 50 and older. J Aging Phys Act. 2001;9:S71–91.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Theou O, French J, Hernandez D, Rose DJ, Jones J. Measuring older adult gait speed in community settings using the 30 foot-walk at preferred and maximum speed. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:S331.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wolf FM. Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1986.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, Salive ME, Wallace RB. Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:556–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1994;49:M85–94.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Onder G, Penninx BW, Ferrucci L, Fried LP, Guralnik JM, Pahor M. Measures of physical performance and risk for progressive and catastrophic disability: results from the Women's Health and Aging Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60:74–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Montero-Odasso M, Schapira M, Soriano ER, Varela M, Kaplan R, Camera LA, et al. Gait velocity as a single predictor of adverse events in healthy seniors aged 75 years and older. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60:1304–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Griffin SF, Wilcox S, Ory MG, Lattimore D, Leviton L, Castro C, Carpenter RA, Rheaume C. Results from the Active for Life process evaluation: program delivery fidelity and adaptations. Health Educ Res. 2009 Mar 26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meghan Baruth
    • 7
  • Sara Wilcox
    • 1
  • Stacy Wegley
    • 2
  • David M. Buchner
    • 3
  • Marcia G. Ory
    • 4
  • Alisa Phillips
    • 5
  • Karen Schwamberger
    • 2
  • Terry L. Bazzarre
    • 6
  1. 1.University of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Hamilton County Public HealthCincinnatiUSA
  3. 3.University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA
  4. 4.Texas A & M Science CenterCollege StationUSA
  5. 5.Council on Aging of Southwestern OhioCincinnatiUSA
  6. 6.Robert Wood Johnson FoundationPrincetonUSA
  7. 7.Public Health Research CenterUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations