Changes in Physical Functioning in the Active Living Every Day Program of the Active for Life Initiative®
- 234 Downloads
Physical activity can prevent or delay the onset of physical functional limitations in older adults. There are limited data that evidence-based physical activity interventions can be successfully translated into community programs and result in similar benefits for physical functioning.
The purpose of this study is to measure the effects of the Active Living Every Day program on physical functioning and physical functional limitations in a diverse sample of older adults.
As a part of the Active for Life initiative, the Council on Aging of Southwestern Ohio implemented Active Living Every Day (ALED), a group-based lifestyle behavior change program designed to increase physical activity. Performance-based physical functioning tests (30-s Chair Stand Test, eight Foot Up-and-Go Test, Chair Sit-and-Reach Test, 30-Foot Walk Test) were administered to participants at baseline and posttest. Baseline to post-program changes in physical functioning and impairment status were examined with repeated measures analysis of covariance. Interactions tested whether change over time differed according to race/ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), and baseline impairment status.
Participants significantly increased their performance in all four physical functioning tests. The percentage of participants classified as “impaired” according to normative data significantly decreased over time. Physical functioning improved regardless of BMI, race/ethnicity, or baseline impairment status.
ALED is an example of an evidenced-based physical activity program that can be successfully translated into community programs and result in significant and clinically meaningful improvements in performance-based measures of physical functioning.
KeywordsPhysical activity Exercise Translational research Behavioral intervention
The Active for Life (AFL) initiative was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation or other institutions affiliated with the authors.
We gratefully acknowledge the many participants who took part in the Active for Life program and evaluation at the Council on Aging of Southwestern Ohio. We also acknowledge the involvement and significant contribution of staff from Council on Aging of Southwestern Ohio, Hamilton County Public Health, Human Kinetics, Inc, Texas A&M Health Science Center, and the University of South Carolina. We thank the National Advisory Committee for its valuable contributions to Active for Life. Finally, we thank Dr. Jessie Jones for her training and consultation in the functional fitness tests.
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Healthy aging—improving and extending quality of life among older Americans: at a glance. 2009. [http://www.cdc.gov/NCCdphp/publications/aag/pdf/healthy_aging.pdf]. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
- 3.LIFE Study Investigators. Effects of a physical activity intervention on measures of physical performance: results of the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders Pilot (LIFE-P). J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61:1157–65.Google Scholar
- 6.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey data. Atlanta, Georgia: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2007.Google Scholar
- 8.Ettinger WH, Jr., Burns R, Messier SP, Applegate W, Rejeski WJ, Morgan T, Shumaker S, Berry MJ, O'Toole M, et al. A randomized trial comparing aerobic exercise and resistance exercise with a health education program in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. The Fitness Arthritis and Seniors Trial (FAST). JAMA. 1997; 277:25-31.Google Scholar
- 13.Yamauchi T, Islam, M.M., Koizumi, D., Rogers, M.E., Rogers, N.L., & Takeshima, N. Effect of home-based well-rounded exercise in community-dwelling older adults. J Sports Sci & Med. 2005;4:563-71.Google Scholar
- 18.Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee report. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.Google Scholar
- 22.King AC, Pruitt LA, Phillips W, Oka R, Rodenburg A, Haskell WL. Comparative effects of two physical activity programs on measured and perceived physical functioning and other health-related quality of life outcomes in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55:M74–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Dunn AL, Marcus BH, Kampert JB, Garcia ME, Kohl HW, 3rd, Blair SN. Reduction in cardiovascular disease risk factors: 6-month results from Project Active. Prev Med. 1997 Nov-Dec;26:883-92.Google Scholar
- 26.Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1986.Google Scholar
- 28.Rikli REJ, C.J.,. Senior fitness test manual. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2001.Google Scholar
- 31.Stewart AL, Mills KM, Sepsis PG, King AC, McLellan BY, Roitz K, Ritter PL. Evaluation of CHAMPS, a physical activity promotion program for older adults. Ann Behav Med. 1997 Fall;19:353-61.Google Scholar
- 33.Stewart AL. Community-based physical activity programs for adults age 50 and older. J Aging Phys Act. 2001;9:S71–91.Google Scholar
- 34.Theou O, French J, Hernandez D, Rose DJ, Jones J. Measuring older adult gait speed in community settings using the 30 foot-walk at preferred and maximum speed. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:S331.Google Scholar
- 35.Wolf FM. Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1986.Google Scholar
- 36.Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.Google Scholar
- 38.Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1994;49:M85–94.Google Scholar
- 41.Griffin SF, Wilcox S, Ory MG, Lattimore D, Leviton L, Castro C, Carpenter RA, Rheaume C. Results from the Active for Life process evaluation: program delivery fidelity and adaptations. Health Educ Res. 2009 Mar 26.Google Scholar