Low Life Course Socioeconomic Status (SES) is Associated with Negative NEO PI-R Personality Patterns
- 572 Downloads
Low socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with poor health. One potential pathway accounting for this relationship may be an association between low SES and personality characteristics that affect health.
Associations among parent's education, current SES (education and income), and personality were examined among 233 African Americans and Caucasian, male and female community volunteers.
Using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) to model neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness simultaneously, participant's education, household income, and father's and mother's education each had significant main effects on personality. When examining the life course—the combination of both current and childhood SES—distinctive patterns emerged for each domain, depending upon whether mother's or father's education was used to index childhood SES. When using mother's education as a childhood SES index, a high life course SES (high participant's SES/high mother's education) was associated with high extraversion and openness. Using father's education as a childhood SES index, a low life course SES (low participant's SES/low father's education) was associated with disproportionately high neuroticism and low conscientiousness. These effects did not differ by race or sex.
The implications of these findings for the role of personality in the SES–health relationship are discussed.
KeywordsSocioeconomic factors Social class Personality Education
This study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant P01HL36587, National Institute of Mental Health grant K05MH79482, Clinical Research Unit grant M01RR30, and the Duke University Behavioral Medicine Research Center.
- 3.Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SBG. Manual of the Eysenck personality questionnaire. Sevenoaks: Hodder and Stoughton; 1975.Google Scholar
- 4.Lazarus RS. Stress and emotion: a new synthesis. New York: Springer; 1999.Google Scholar
- 5.Rosenman RH. Personality, behaviour patterns and heart disease. In: Cooper CL, editor. Handbook of stress, medicine and health. New York: CRC; 1996.Google Scholar
- 7.Digman JM. Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model. Annu Rev Psychol. 1990;41:417–40.Google Scholar
- 8.John OP. The “Big Five” factor taxonomy: dimensions of personality in the natural languages and in questionnaires. In: Pervin LA, editor. Handbook of personality: theory and research. New York: Guilford; 1990. p. 66–100.Google Scholar
- 10.Costa PT, McCrae RR, Psychological Assessment Resources Inc. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1992.Google Scholar
- 39.Burroughs AR, Visscher WA, Haney TL, Efland JR, Barefoot JC, Williams RB Jr, et al. Community recruitment process by race, gender, and SES gradient: lessons learned from the Community Health and Stress Evaluation (CHASE) study experience. J Community Health. 2003;28(6):421–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 53.Wilson RS, Mendes de Leon CF, Bienias JL, Evans DA, Bennett DA. Personality and mortality in old age. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2004;59(3):110–6.Google Scholar
- 54.Farley R, Allen W. The color line in the qualtiy of life in America. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987.Google Scholar
- 55.Jaynes G, Williams RJ. A common destiny: blacks and American society. Washington: National Academy Press; 1989.Google Scholar