Psychological Factors Discriminating Between Successful and Unsuccessful Weight Loss in a Behavioral Exercise and Nutrition Education Treatment
- 514 Downloads
Psychological and behavioral characteristics that predict success or failure with weight-loss treatments are poorly understood.
The purpose of this study was to assess whether social cognitive theory-based factors discriminate between women who are successful and unsuccessful at weight loss.
Obese women (BMI = 30 to 45 kg/m2) who participated in a treatment of behavioral exercise support counseling and nutrition education were divided into quartiles based on percentage of body weight lost over 6 months. Factors based on social cognitive theory, both at baseline and change over 6 months, and exercise attendance were used to discriminate between the successful (highest quartile, Mchange in body weight = −9.3%; n = 40) and unsuccessful (lowest quartile, Mchange in body weight = 1.9%; n = 37) groups.
Stepwise discriminant analyses indicated that body satisfaction and tension (anxiety) scores at baseline, and changes over 6 months in self-regulatory efficacy and body satisfaction, made significant contributions to predicting group membership (64% and 69% of cases were correctly classified, respectively). Attendance percentage of exercise sessions was significantly greater for the successful weight-loss group, and when added as a predictor, changes in self-regulatory efficacy and attendance made a significant contribution to predicting group membership (81% of cases were correctly classified).
Further research may enable psychological determinants to better guide weight loss theory and treatments.
KeywordsExercise Weight loss Social cognitive Behavioral Self-efficacy Physical activity
- 2.World Health Organization (2008) Obesity and overweight. Retrieved September 26, 2008, from http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/facts/obesity/en/.
- 9.Tiexiera PJ, Palmeira AL, Branco TL, Martins SS, Minderico CS, Brata JT, et al. Who will lose weight? A reexamination of predictors of weight loss in women. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2004;1:12. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-1-12. http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/1/1/12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Brownell KD. Exercise and obesity treatment: psychological aspects. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1995;10(Suppl):122–5.Google Scholar
- 14.Buckworth J, Dishman RK. Exercise psychology. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2002.Google Scholar
- 15.Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2008;40:181–8.Google Scholar
- 16.Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.Google Scholar
- 17.Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman; 1997.Google Scholar
- 18.Baker CW, Brownell KD. Physical activity and maintenance of weight loss: physiological and psychological mechanisms. In: Bouchard C, editor. Physical activity and obesity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2000. p. 311–28.Google Scholar
- 20.Annesi JJ, Whitaker AC. Weight loss and psychologic gain in obese women - participants in a supported exercise intervention. Permanente Journal. 2008;12(3):36–45.Google Scholar
- 21.McAuley E, Peña MM, Jerome GJ. Self-efficacy as a determinant and an outcome of exercise. In: Roberts G, editor. Advances in motivation in sport and exercise. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2001. p. 235–61.Google Scholar
- 23.Landers DM, Arent SM. Physical activity and mental health. In: Singer RN, Hausenblas HA, Janelle CM, editors. Handbook of sport psychology. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2001. p. 740–65.Google Scholar
- 28.McAuley E, Mihalko SL. Measuring exercise-related self-efficacy. In: Duda JL, editor. Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology; 1998. p. 371–90.Google Scholar
- 29.Fitts WH, Warren WL. Tennessee Self-Concept Scale manual. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services; 1996.Google Scholar
- 31.Cash TF. The Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire users’ manual. Norfolk, VA: Old Dominion University; 1994.Google Scholar
- 32.McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF. Manual for the Profile of Mood States. San Diego, CA: Education and Industrial Testing Service; 1992.Google Scholar
- 33.Jackson AS, Pollock ML. Practical assessment of body composition. Phys Sportsmed. 1985;13:76–90.Google Scholar
- 34.Kaiser Permanente Health Education Services. Cultivating Health weight management resource guide. Portland, OR: Author; 2002.Google Scholar
- 36.Borg G. Borg’s perceived exertion and pain scales. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1998.Google Scholar
- 44.Jaccard J. Interaction effects in factorial analysis of variance: Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, series no. 07-118. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.Google Scholar
- 45.Holm D. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1979;6:65–70.Google Scholar
- 46.Kromery JD, Dickson WB. The use of an overall F test to control Type I error rates in factoral analysis of variance: limitations and better strategies. JAppl Behav Anal. 1995;31:51–64.Google Scholar
- 49.Glasgow RE. What types of evidence are most needed to advance behavioral medicine? Annals Behav Med. 2008;35:19–25.Google Scholar
- 50.Wilfley DE, Brownell KD. Physical activity and diet in weight loss. In: Dishman RK, editor. Advances in exercise adherence. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1994. p. 361–93.Google Scholar