International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 236–240

Cardiac Stress Reactivity and Recovery of Novelty Seekers

  • Mirka Hintsanen
  • Sampsa Puttonen
  • Petrus Järvinen
  • Laura Pulkki-Råback
  • Marko Elovainio
  • Päivi Merjonen
  • Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen



Novelty seeking temperament has been associated with higher coronary heart disease risk factors, but the mechanism behind the association is open. Cardiac stress response is a potential candidate.


Cardiac stress reactivity and recovery was studied in 29 healthy subjects (aged 22–37 years) scoring extremely high (n = 16) or extremely low (n = 13) on temperamental dimension of novelty seeking.


Heart rate, respiratory sinus arrhythmia, and pre-ejection period were measured during challenging tasks. Differences in cardiac reactivity and recovery between the novelty seeking groups were examined with repeated-measures and univariate analyses.


The main finding was that stress reactivity did not differ between high and low novelty seeking groups, but high novelty seekers tended to show faster recovery, which is likely to be parasympathetically mediated.


The findings suggest that high novelty seekers may be more stress resilient because they might have faster cardiac recovery after stress. Cardiac stress reactivity seems not to be among the explaining factors for the association between novelty seeking and coronary heart disease risk factors.


Temperament Novelty seeking Cardiac reactivity Cardiac recovery Autonomic nervous system 


  1. 1.
    Buss AH, Plomin R. Temperament: early developing personality traits. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1984.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cloninger CR. A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. A proposal. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987;44:573–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Strelau J. The role of temperament as a moderator of stress. In: Wachs TD, Kohnstamm GA, editors. Temperament in context. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001. p. 153–72.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Strelau J. Temperament as a moderator of coping with stress. In: Battmann W, Dutke S, editors. Processes of the molar regulation of behavior. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers; 1996. p. 205–17.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cloninger CR, Svrakic DM, Przybeck TR. A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50:975–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Puttonen S, Elovainio M, Kivimäki M, Koskinen T, Pulkki-Råback L, Viikari JS, et al. Temperament, health-related behaviors, and autonomic cardiac regulation: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Biol Psychol. 2008;78:204–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sovio U, King V, Miettunen J, Ek E, Laitinen J, Joukamaa M, et al. Cloninger's temperament dimensions, socio-economic and lifestyle factors and metabolic syndrome markers at age 31 years in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966. J Health Psychol. 2007;12:371–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hintsanen M, Pulkki-Råback L, Juonala M, Viikari JS, Raitakari OT, Keltikangas-Järvinen L. Cloninger's temperament traits and preclinical atherosclerosis: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. J Psychosom Res. 2009;in press).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Åkerblom HK, Uhari M, Pesonen E, Dahl M, Kaprio EA, Nuutinen EM, et al. Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns. Ann Med. 1991;23:35–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Raitakari OT, Juonala M, Rönnemaa T, Keltikangas-Järvinen L, Räsänen L, Pietikäinen M, Hutri-Kähönen N, Taittonen L, Jokinen E, Marniemi J, Jula A, Telama R, Kähönen M, Lehtimäki T, Åkerblom HK, Viikari JS. Cohort profile: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37(6):1220–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Keltikangas-Järvinen L, Heponiemi T. Vital exhaustion, temperament, and cardiac reactivity in task-induced stress. Biol Psychol. 2004;65:121–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Puttonen S, Keltikangas-Järvinen L, Elovainio M, Kivimäki M, Rontu R, Lehtimäki T. Epidermal growth factor A61G polymorphism and cardiac autonomic control in adults. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2005;29:702–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sherwood A, Allen MT, Fahrenberg J, Kelsey RM, Lovallo WR, van Doornen LJ. Methodological guidelines for impedance cardiography. Psychophysiology. 1990;27:1–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brownley KA, Hurwitz BE, Schneiderman N. Cardiovascular psychophysiology. In: Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG, Berntson GG, editors. Handbook of psychophysiology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press; 2000. p. 224–64.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berntson GG, Bigger JT Jr, Eckberg DL, Grossman P, Kaufmann PG, Malik M, et al. Heart rate variability: origins, methods, and interpretive caveats. Psychophysiology. 1997;34:623–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mirka Hintsanen
    • 1
  • Sampsa Puttonen
    • 2
  • Petrus Järvinen
    • 3
  • Laura Pulkki-Råback
    • 1
  • Marko Elovainio
    • 4
    • 5
  • Päivi Merjonen
    • 1
  • Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of HelsinkiUniversity of HelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Finnish Institute of Occupational HealthHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Department of MedicineUniversity of KuopioKuopioFinland
  4. 4.National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and HealthHelsinkiFinland
  5. 5.Department of Epidemiology and Public HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations