The Factor Structure and Factorial Invariance for the Decisional Balance Scale for Adolescent Smoking
- 150 Downloads
The transtheoretical model is a framework to explain smoking uptake and cessation in adolescence. Decisional balance is proposed as a driver of stage movement.
The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure and measurement equivalence/invariance (ME/I) of the decisional balance scale.
In this study, we used confirmatory factor analysis followed by measurement equivalence/invariance testing to examine the factorial validity of the decisional balance scale in adolescent smokers and nonsmokers.
Unlike previous studies, we found that a four-factor solution splitting cons into esthetic and health cons significantly improved the fit of model to the data. ME/I testing showed that the same structure and measurement model held for both smokers and nonsmokers, girls and boys, and across the three occasions the scale was administered.
Cons showed strong evidence that it constituted two separate first order factors. Decisional balance for smoking in adolescence has good evidence of factorial validity.
KeywordsDecisional balance scale TTM Factor structure Measurement invariance test Longitudinal study
This study was supported by Cancer Research UK grant C9278/A5639. Paul Aveyard is supported by a National Institute for Health Research Career Scientist Award.
- 7.Hau KT, Wen Z, Cheng Z. Structural equation model and its applications. 2nd ed. Beijing: Educational Science; 2005.Google Scholar
- 10.Aveyard P, Cheng KK, Almond J, Sherratt E, Lancashire R, Lawrence T, et al. Cluster randomised controlled trial of expert system based on the transtheoretical (“stages of change”) model for smoking prevention and cessation in schools. Br Med J. 1999;319:948–53.Google Scholar
- 11.Aveyard P, Sherratt E, Almond J, Lawrence T, Lancashire R, Griffin C, et al. The change-in-stage and updated smoking status results from a cluster-randomized trial of smoking prevention and cessation using the transtheoretical model among British adolescents. Prev Med 2001;33:313–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Wen Z, Hau KT, Marsh HW. Structural equation model testing: cutoff criteria for goodness of fit indices and chi-square test. Acta Psychol Sin. 2004;36:186–94.Google Scholar
- 15.Hagenaars JA, McCutcheon AL. Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2002.Google Scholar
- 16.Kaplan D. Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. London: Sage; 2000.Google Scholar