Advertisement

The Life Control Scale: Validation with a Population Cohort of Middle-Aged Australian Women

Article

Abstract

Background

The concept of perceived control is central to many theories of physical and emotional well-being. However, existing measures are lengthy and generally focus on job control. In epidemiological research, brief measures and those which can be applied across entire populations are needed. Among women in particular, a substantial minority have no paid work, while most also have major unpaid family commitments which may affect well-being through their effect on control. Thus, we evaluated the six-item Life Control Scale (Bobak, Soc Sci Med. 47:269–79, 1998) with a population-based sample of middle-aged women.

Method

A population-based sample of 11,223 women aged 50 to 55, participating in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health, completed the Life Control Scale as part of an omnibus survey of health and psychosocial factors.

Results

The scale was demonstrated to be unifactorial and internally reliable and to show the expected relationships with several measures of socioeconomic position, physical health, and mental health.

Conclusion

The Life Control Scale is brief, valid, and broadly applicable in epidemiological research.

Keywords

Perceived control Women Physical health Mental health Socioeconomic position 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research on which this paper is based was conducted as part of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health, The University of Newcastle, and The University of Queensland. We are grateful for the Commonwealth Department of Health and Aging for funding and to the women who provided the survey data.

References

  1. 1.
    Steptoe A, Appels A, editors. In: Stress, personal control and health. Oxford: Wiley; 1989.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Walker J. Control and the psychology of health: theory, measurement and applications. London: Open University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wallston KA, Wallston BS, Smith S, Dobbins CJ. Perceived control and health. Curr Psychol Res Rev 1987;6:5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allison KR. Theoretical issues concerning the relationship between perceived control and preventive health behaviour. Health Educ Res. 1991;6:141–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Calnan M. Control over health and patterns of health-related behaviour. Soc Sci Med. 1989;29:131–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Perlman F, Bobak M, Steptoe A, Rose R, Marmot M. Do health control beliefs predict behaviour in Russians? Prev Med. 2003;3:73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Theorell T. To be able to exert control over one’s own situation: a necessary condition for coping with stressors. In: Quick JC, Tetrick LE, editors. Handbook of occupational health psychology. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 2003. p. 201–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marmot MG, Bosma H, Hemingway H, Brunner E, Stansfeld S. Contribution of job control and other risk factors to social variations in coronary heart disease incidence. Lancet. 1997;350(9073):235–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D’Souza RM, Strazdins L, Lim LL-Y, Broom DH, Rodgers B. Work and health in a contemporary society: demands, control, and insecurity. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:849–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karasek R. Job content questionnaire: a research tool to assess job related stress. http://www.uml.edu/Dept/WE/research/jcq/jcq.htm (1999). Accessed 20th November 2007.
  11. 11.
    Lee C, Dobson A, Brown WJ, Bryson L, Byles J, Warner-Smith P, et al. Cohort profile: the Australian longitudinal study on women’s health. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34:987–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bobak M, Pikhart H, Hertzman C, Rose R, Hertzman C, Marmot M. Socioeconomic factors, material inequalities and perceived control in self-rated health: cross-sectional data from seven post-communist countries. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:1343–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lachman ME, Boone James J, editors. In: Multiple paths of midlife development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1997.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bobak M, Pikhart H, Hertzman C, Rose R, Marmot M. Socioeconomic factors, perceived control and self-reported health in Russia: a cross-sectional survey. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:269–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosengren S, Hawken S, Ôunpuu K, Sliwa M, Zubaid W, Almahmeed K, et al. Association of psychosocial risk factors with risk of acute myocardial infarction in 11,119 cases and 13,648 controls from 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364(9438):953–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee C, Powers JR. Number of social roles, health and well-being in three generations of Australian women. Int J Behav Med. 2002;9:195–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brown WJ, Bryson L, Byles J, Dobson AJ, Lee C, Mishra G, et al. Women’s Health Australia: recruitment for a national longitudinal cohort study. Women Health. 1998;28:23–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Australian Bureau of Statistics. Census of population and housing. http://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/d3310114.nsf/Home/census (2007). Accessed 20th November 2007.
  19. 19.
    Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user’s manual. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre; 1994.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Coons SJ, Rao S, Keininger DL, Hays RD. A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000;17:13–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McCallum J. The SF-36 in an Australian sample: validating a new generic health status measure. Aust J Public Health. 1995;19:160–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scheier MF, Carver CS, Bridges MW. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the life orientation test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67:1063–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Heinonen K, Räikkönen K, Matthews KA, Scheier MF, Raitakari OT, Pulkki L, et al. Socioeconomic status in childhood and adulthood: associations with dispositional optimism and pessimism over a 21-year follow-up. J Person. 2006;74:1111–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bell S, Lee C. Development of the perceived stress questionnaire for young women. Psychol Health Med. 2002;7:189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bell S, Lee C. Perceived stress revisited: the women’s health Australia project young cohort. Psychol Health Med. 2003;8:343–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Roberts RE, Vernon SW. The center for epidemiologic studies depression scale: its use in a community sample. Am J Psychiatry. 1983;140:41–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    France C, Lee C, Powers J. Depressive symptomatology among young Australian women. Aust Psychol. 2004;39:228–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Beekman ATF, Deeg DJH, Van Limbeek J, Braam AW, de Vries MZ, van Tilburg W. Criterion validity of the CES-D: Results from a community-based sample of older subjects in the Netherlands. Psychol Med. 1997;27:231–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DL. Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of the short-form CES-D. Am J Prev Med. 1994;10:77–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Boey KW. Cross validation of a short form of the CES-D in Chinese elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1999;14:608–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Aweto AW, Landau R. Locus of control and socioeconomic status: does internal locus of control reflect real resources and opportunities or personal coping abilities? Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1499–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bosma H, Schrijvers C, Mackenbach JP. Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and importance of perceived control: cohort study. Br Med J. 1999;319:1469–70.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Koelen MA, Lindström B. Making healthy choices easy choices: the role of empowerment. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005;59(Suppl 1):S10−6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia
  2. 2.School of Population HealthUniversity of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations