Advertisement

Journal of Computing in Higher Education

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 233–248 | Cite as

Applying ‘Sketch Engine for Language Learning’ in the Japanese English classroom

  • Yoko HirataEmail author
  • Yoshihiro Hirata
Article

Abstract

The application of online authentic language data has played an increasingly important role in language teaching. These include freely available online corpora such as the British National Corpus and the Corpus of Contemporary American English. However, students are easily overwhelmed by the enormous amount of incomplete sentences (concordance lines) contained therein and therefore may fail to consult keywords and expressions as a resource tool. As an alternative resource a new web-based platform for English language learning, called Sketch Engine for Language Learning (SkELL), has been developed. Unlike the aforementioned corpora, SkELL generates sufficient amount of complete sentences which help students learn multiple examples of lexical and grammatical items in context. However, little research has been conducted as to how Japanese students with lower English proficiency assess the efficacy of SkELL. This study aims to examine the potential and limitation of SkELL in the language classroom for Japanese students who have almost no online experience in educational settings. The findings indicate that there is a close relationship between students’ view of the utilisation and efficacy of the resource and their attitudes toward English education. The study concludes with a discussion of pedagogical implications of the use of SkELL as a valuable educational tool for students who are accustomed to traditional English language learning.

Keywords

SkELL Japan Online platform English language teaching 

Notes

References

  1. Aspinall, R. W. (2013). International education policy in japan in an age of globalization and risk. Leiden: Global Oriental.Google Scholar
  2. Baisa, V., & Suchomel, V. (2014). SkELL: Web interface for English language learning. In A. Horák, & P. Rychlý (Eds.), Proceedings of recent advances in Slavonic natural language processing (pp. 63–70).Google Scholar
  3. Bao, D. (2014). Understanding silence and reticence: Ways of participating in second language acquisition. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  4. Barrs, K. (2016). Using the sketch engine corpus query tool for language teaching. The Language Teaching, 40(2), 23–26.Google Scholar
  5. Boulton, A. (2012). Beyond concordancing: Multiple affordances of corpora in university language degrees. Procedia: Social Behavioral Sciences, 34, 33–38.Google Scholar
  6. Boulton, A., Carter-Thomas, S., & Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2012). Issues in corpus-informed research and learning in ESP. In A. Boulton, S. Carter-Thomas, & E. Rowley-Jolivet (Eds.), Corpus-informed research and learning in ESP. Issues and applications (pp. 1–14). Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boulton, A., & Tyne, H. (2015). Corpus-based study of language and teacher education. In M. Bigelow & J. Ennser-Kananen (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 301–312). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Braun, S. (2007). Integrating corpus work into secondary education: From data-driven learning to needs-driven corpora. ReCALL, 19(3), 307–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chambers, A. (2005). Integrating corpus consultation in language studies. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 111–125.Google Scholar
  10. Cooker, L., & Torpey, M. (2004). From the classroom to the self-access centre: A chronicle of learner-centred curriculum development. The Language Teacher, 28(6), 11–16.Google Scholar
  11. Dunkel, P. A. (1986). Developing listening fluency in L2: Theoretical perspectives and pedagogical considerations. The Modern Language Journal, 70(ii), 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal, 51(1), 36–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40(2), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Humphries, S., & Burns, A. (2015). In reality it’s almost impossible’: CLT-oriented curriculum change. ELT Journal, 69(3), 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes. An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, K. (2008). An introduction to foreign language learning and teaching. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  17. Kilgarriff, A., Marcowitz, F., Smith, S., & Thomas, J. (2015). Corpora and language learning with the sketch engine and SKELL. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, 20(1), 61–80.Google Scholar
  18. Mishan, F. (2004). Authenticating corpora for language learning: A problem and its resolution. ELT Journal, 58(3), 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shudong, W., & Higgins, M. (2006). Limitations of mobile phone learning. The JALT CALL Journal, 2(1), 3–14.Google Scholar
  20. Sketch Engine for Language Learning. (2018). Lexical Computing Ltd. Retrieved October 20, 2018 from https://skell.sketchengine.co.uk/run.cgi/skell.
  21. The Next Stage to the TOEIC Test. (2011). Tokyo: Kinseido.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hokkai-Gakuen UniversitySapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations