Advertisement

Reviewing and exploring innovative ubiquitous learning tools in higher education

  • Shadi A. AljawarnehEmail author
Article

Abstract

In the higher education sector, a new era has begun with the advent of ubiquitous learning environments. Ubiquitous learning tools allow improving context-aware as well as learning experiences by offering seamless availability regardless of location all the time. They also help in establishing effortless interaction between authentic and digital learning resources and at the same time offering personalised learning opportunities as well. There are numerous available ubiquitous e-learning tools that can be employed in higher education. E-learning tools also offer training and higher education to many students that have different higher educational levels and come from diverse cultural backgrounds. However, if the capabilities of e-learning are underestimated, these may not be successful in higher education. Some of the people lack understanding about the limitations and weaknesses of e-learning, while some may have superfluous expectations. In this paper, various e-learning tools like Wikipedia, MOODLE, Web 2.0, Web 3.0 and Blackboard have been evaluated. We also comment on key aims regarding each tool and investigate the disadvantages and advantages. Based on this analysis, a global view regarding the current as well as future tendencies pertaining to ubiquitous e-learning tools is obtained and thus possible key comments are provided for employing e-learning tools like MOODLE, Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 in the classroom. Based on our teaching experience, MOODLE was found to be efficient in the development of e-learning. MOODLE was favoured by a majority of authors and practitioners rather than Blackboard. However, MOODLE cannot be considered a fully pure social software since it does not include social networks. In this review, the scope of employing ubiquitous learning environments has been presented in higher education contexts. However, it increases the requirement for transparent research that shows practical implications to generalise future development processes. Moreover, it was shown that e-learning 3.0 is one amongst the key trends employing Web 3.0 tools for social learning. Also, on the Internet, quick incorporation of new services into existing applications like integrating Wiki with Web 3.0 can be done easily. The primary risk here would be the fact that lecturers and students are not fully aware that these web services are not controlled by their universities. Since these servers have been installed in many different countries, the principles and privacy laws vary from country to country.

Keywords

Moodle Blackboard Web 2.0 Web 3.0 Wiki Learning tools Assessment 

Notes

References

  1. Aibar, E., Lladós-Masllorens, J., Meseguer-Artola, A., Minguillón, J., & Lerga, M. (2015). Wikipedia at university: what faculty think and do about it. The Electronic Library, 33(4), 668–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aljawarneh, S. (2011). A web engineering security methodology for e-learning systems. Network Security, 2011(3), 12–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aljawarneh, S. A., Alawneh, A., & Jaradat, R. (2016). Cloud security engineering: Early stages of SDLC. Future Generation Computer Systems, 74, 385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aljawarneh, S., Alshargabi, B., Hayajneh, S. M. A., & Imam, A. T. (2015). Integration of E-learning and cloud computing platform through software engineering. Recent Patents on Computer Science, 8(2), 100–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aljawarneh, S., Muhsin, Z., Nsour, A., Alkhateeb, F., & AlMaghayreh, E. (2010). E-learning tools and technologies in education: a perspective. In The Fifth International Conference of Learning International Networks Consortium (LINC). Cambridge, MA: MIT. http://people.math.sfu.ca/~vjungic/shadi.pdf.
  6. Aljawarneh, S. A., Radhakrishna, V., & Cheruvu, A. (2017). VRKSHA: a novel tree structure for time-profiled temporal association mining. Neural Computing and Applications, 1–29.Google Scholar
  7. Anshari, M., Alas, Y., & Guan, L. S. (2016). Developing online learning resources: Big data, social networks, and cloud computing to support pervasive knowledge. Education and Information Technologies, 21(6), 1663–1677.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9407-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bayliss, G. (2013). Exploring the cautionary attitude toward Wikipedia in higher education: implications for higher education institutions. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 19(1), 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benson, V., & Morgan, S. (2013). Student experience and ubiquitous learning in higher education: Impact of wireless and cloud applications. Creative Education.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.48A001.Google Scholar
  10. Blankley, A., Kerr, D., & Wiggins, C. (2019). An Examination and analysis of technologies employed by accounting educators. The Accounting Educators’ Journal, 28.Google Scholar
  11. Boulos, M. N., Maramba, I., & Wheeler, S. (2006). Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Medical Education, 6(1), 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Calhoun, C. (2014). Using Wikipedia in information literacy instruction tips for developing research skills. College & Research Libraries News, 75(1), 32–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cárdenas, R.G. & Sanchez, E.M. (2005). Security challenges of distributed e-learning systems. In Series Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2005) ISSADS (Vol. 3563, pp. 538–544), Springer. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/issads/issads2005.html#CardenasS05.
  14. Casey, D., & Mifsud, T. (2005). Time-slicing through space: de-structuring formal learning environments with u-learning technologies. International Journal of Learning, 12(3), 113–120.Google Scholar
  15. Chen H. L., Cannon D., Gabrio J, Leifer L, Toye G. & Bailey T. (2005). Using wikis and weblogs to support reflective learning in an introductory engineering design course. In Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, June 12–15.Google Scholar
  16. Chen, G. D., Chang, C. K., & Wang, C. Y. (2008). Ubiquitous learning website: Scaffold learners by mobile devices with information-aware techniques. Computers & Education, 50(1), 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen, G.-D., & Chao, P.-Y. (2008). Augmenting traditional books with context-aware learning supports from online learning communities. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 27–40.Google Scholar
  18. Chin, K., & Chen, Y. (2013). A mobile learning support system for ubiquitous learning environments. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 73, 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Daniel, B. (2015). Big data and analytics in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 904–920.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elgort, I., Smith, A. G., & Toland, J. (2008). Is wiki an effective platform for group course work? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Evans, P. (2006). The wiki factor. BizEd, January/February, 28–32.Google Scholar
  22. Haffar, N., Maraoui, M., & Aljawarneh, S. (2016). Use of indexed Arabic text in e-learning system. In 2016 International Conference on Engineering & MIS (ICEMIS), Agadir (pp. 1–7).  https://doi.org/10.1109/icemis.2016.7745321.
  23. Heilman, J. M., & West, A. G. (2015). Wikipedia and medicine: quantifying readership, editors, and the significance of natural language. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(3), e62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Herbert, V. G., Frings, A., Rehatschek, H., Richard, G., & Leithner, A. (2015). Wikipedia—challenges and new horizons in enhancing medical education. BMC Medical Education, 15(1), 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Herdiana, R., Shafie, A. (2008). Moodle: Tool to manage probability and statistics course in Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS. In Proceedings (ICEE 2008) International Conference on Engineering Education “New Challanges in Engineering Education and Research in the 21st Century” (pp. 27–31) July 2008, Pécs-Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
  26. Huang, Y.-M., Chiu, P.-S., Liu, T.-C., & Chen, T.-S. (2011). The design and implementation of a meaningful learning-based evaluation method for ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.023.Google Scholar
  27. Huda, M., Maseleno, A., Atmotiyoso, P., Siregar, M., Ahmad, R., Jasmi, K., et al. (2018). Big data emerging technology: insights into innovative environment for online learning resources. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 13(1), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hwang, G. J., Chen, B., & Huang, C. W. (2016). Development and effectiveness analysis of personalized ubiquitous multi-device certification tutoring system based on Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 223–236.Google Scholar
  29. Kibble, J. D., et al. (2007). Effective use of course management systems to enhance student learning: Experimental biology 2007. Advance Physiology Education, 31, 377–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Knorr, E. M. (2006). Course management system (CMS) evaluation and strategy at UBC: A viewpoint from the faculty of science. Vancouver: Department of Computer Science, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  31. Konieczny, P. (2014). Rethinking wikipedia for the classroom. Contexts, 13(1), 80–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. MacPhee, L., Shelley, E., & Karcz, G. (2003). How can a course management system (CMS) enhance my online (or faceto-face) course. Center for Technology Enhanced Learning.Google Scholar
  33. Meddeb, O., Maraoui, M., Aljawarneh, S. (2016). Hybrid modeling of an OffLine Arabic Handwriting Recognition System AHRS. In 2016 International Conference on Engineering & MIS (ICEMIS), Agadir (pp. 1–8).  https://doi.org/10.1109/icemis.2016.7745319.
  34. Peng, H., Chou, C., & Chang, C. (2008). From virtual environments to physical environments: exploring interactivity in ubiquitous-learning systems. Educational Technology & Society. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.11.2.54.
  35. Pimmer, C., Mateescu, M., & Gröhbiel, U. (2016). Mobile and ubiquitous learning in higher education settings. A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 490–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Provost, F., & Fawcett, T. (2013). Data science and its relationship to big data and datadriven decision making. Big Data, 1(1), 51–59.  https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2013.1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ramim, M., & Levy, Y. (2006). Securing e-learning systems: A case of insider cyber attacks and novice IT management in a small university. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 8(4), 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rosato, J., Dodds, C., & Laughlin, S. (2007). Usability of course management systems by students. Duluth: Department of Computer Information Systems/Computer Science, College of Scholastica.Google Scholar
  39. Sakamura, K., & Koshizuka, N. (2005). Ubiquitous computing technologies for ubiquitous learning. In Proceedings of the 2005 I.E. International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE ‘05).  https://doi.org/10.1109/WMTE.2005.67.
  40. Selwyn, N., & Gorard, S. (2016). Students’ use of Wikipedia as an academic resource—patterns of use and perceptions of usefulness. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sharma, P., & Barrett, B. (2007). Blended learning: Using technology in and beyond the language classroom. London: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
  42. Sigalov, S. E., & Nachmias, R. (2017). Wikipedia as a platform for impactful learning: A new course model in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 2959–2979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tan, V. (2004) Using IVLE to teach large classes—a personal experience. In TLHE 2004 Proceedings (pp. 443–448).Google Scholar
  44. Tulasi, B. (2013). Significance of big data and analytics in higher education. International Journal of Computer Applications, 68(14), 21–23.  https://doi.org/10.5120/11648-7142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Virtanen, M. A., Haavisto, E., Liikanen, E., & Kääriäinen, M. (2018). Ubiquitous learning environments in higher education: A scoping literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 985–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Virtanen, M. A., Kääriäinen, M., Liikanen, E., & Haavisto, E. (2017). Use of ubiquitous 360° learning environment enhances students’ knowledge in clinical histotechnology: A quasi-experimental study. Medical Science Educator.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-017-0429-x.Google Scholar
  47. Wang, H., Zhang, Y., & Cao, J. (2009). Effective collaboration with information sharing in Virtual Universities. IEEE Transactions on Proceedings Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21(6), 840–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weiser, M. (1991). The computer of the 21st century. Scientific American, 265(3), 66–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yahya, S., Ahmad, E., & Jalil, A. (2010). The definition and characteristics of ubiquitous learning. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 6(1), 117–127.Google Scholar
  50. Yu, S., Yang, X., Cheng, G., & Wang, M. (2015). From learning object to learning cell: a resource organization model for ubiquitous learning. Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 206–224.Google Scholar
  51. Zheng, B., Niiya, M., & Warschauer, M. (2015). Wikis and collaborative learning in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(3), 357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Software Engineering Department, CIT FacultyJordan University of Science and TechnologyIrbidJordan

Personalised recommendations