Effects of learner-to-learner interactions on social presence, achievement and satisfaction
One current focus of research regarding online courses concentrates on identifying effective design and delivery methodologies. This non-experimental comparative research study investigated two types of learner-to-learner interaction techniques: designed and contextual interactions and their effects on learner achievement, social presence, interaction quality and learning satisfaction in online asynchronous courses. Designed interactions have a high level of collaborative/cooperative instructional intent. Contextual interactions provide the opportunity for interaction but have little or no collaborative/cooperative instructional intent. Results indicate designed interactions or interactions that have high levels of collaborative/cooperative intent positively affect learner achievement and satisfaction. Results also indicate that a high level of instructor social presence has positive effects on student achievement and learning satisfaction. The results continue to reveal that a high level of interactive quality significantly affects levels of instructor and learner social presence as well as learner satisfaction.
KeywordsLearner-to-learner interaction Online asynchronous learning Social presence Achievement Learner satisfaction Collaborative learning Cooperative learning
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Alderman, B. (2005). The role of interaction in enhancing achievement and student satisfaction in an online course: A rubric analysis. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of E-learn: world conference on E-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education 2005 (pp. 214–219). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
- Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/onlinereportcard.pdf.
- Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Bonnell, K. H., Katz, B. A., & Evey, J. A. (2009). Asynchronous communication in distance learning programs. Kentucky Journal of Communication, 28(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
- Brewer, S. A., & Klein, J. D. (2004). Small group learning in an online asynchronous environment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.Google Scholar
- Grandzol, C. J., & Grandzol, J. R. (2010). Interaction in online courses: More is not always better. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13, 1–18.Google Scholar
- Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. (1995). An examination of teaching and learning processes in distance education and implications for designing instruction. In M. F. Beaudoin (Ed.), Distance education symposium 3: Instruction (Vol. 12, pp. 51–63). ACSDE Research Monograph. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
- Hostetter, C., & Busch, M. (2006). Measuring up online: The relationship between social presence and student learning satisfaction. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
- Kiriakidis, P., & Parker, A. (2008). Faculty and learner interaction in online courses. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 5(11), 17–55.Google Scholar
- Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(1), 16–39.Google Scholar
- Lowenthal, P. R. (2010). The evolution and influence of social presence theory on online learning. In T. T. Kidd (Ed.), Online education and adult learning: New frontiers for teaching practices. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
- Oncu, S., & Ozdilek, Z. (2013). Learning with peers: An interdisciplinary comparative study of learner interaction and satisfaction on an instructional design course. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 1251–1261.Google Scholar
- Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (2001). Lessons from cyberspace to the classroom: The realities of online teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Panitz, T. (1996) Collaborative versus cooperative learning—A comparison of the two concepts which will help us understand the underlying nature of interactive learning. Cape Cod Community College, peninsula, Massachusetts, USA. Retrieved February 2016. http://home.capecod.net/~tpanitz/tedsarticles/coopdefinition.htm.
- Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21–40.Google Scholar
- Pollard, H., Minor, M., & Swanson, A. (2014). Instructor social presence within the community of inquiry framework and its impact on classroom community and the learning environment. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 17(2), n2.Google Scholar
- Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88.Google Scholar
- Short, J. A., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Tu, C. (2002). The measurement of social presence in an online learning environment. International Journal on E-Learning, 1(2), 34–45.Google Scholar
- Weiner, M., & Mehrabian, A. (1968). Language within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar