Facilitating adoption of an interactive e-textbook among university students in a large, introductory biology course
- 497 Downloads
E-textbooks are more prevalent in college courses, but much recent research still shows that students prefer paper textbooks and have difficulty regulating their learning with digital course materials. Still, college instructors—especially in lower-division STEM courses—often adopt digital course materials with e-textbooks that include a variety of metacognitive supports that students may not use. The purpose of this study was to test whether an intervention that drew upon the principles of the Technology Acceptance Model could facilitate better adoption of an interactive e-textbook in a large, introductory biology course. Participants included 239 undergraduate students from laboratory sections that were randomly assigned to a treatment or control group. The treatment group viewed a video detailing the most beneficial ways to interact with an e-textbook. A pre- and post-test were administered to the participants in both groups. The treatment group had higher overall satisfaction, on average, with the e-textbook than the control group but did not report using the interactive tools more often. The implications for instruction with digital course materials are discussed.
KeywordsE-textbook Learning with educational technology STEM Digital course materials
The authors acknowledge Professor Byrant McAllister, who assisted with the creation of the video and helped the researchers by providing access to a population of research participants. Dr. Brenda Leicht also helped us coordinate the recruitment of research subjects. John Gikonyo, a Student Instructional Technology Assistant, helped with the recording of the video. Amanda J. O. Van Horne provided assistance with video editing, and Kirk Batterson assisted with the production of the figure. Lastly, the authors acknowledge the support of the Iowa Center for Research by Undergraduates, who supported Marisa Henze’s participation in this project.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors of this research study do not have any conflicts of interest related to this project. All research procedures in this study were approved by the Institutional Review Board, and all participants consented to participate in the research study according to the procedures approved by the IRB.
Supplementary material 1 (MP4 408284 kb)
- Brunet, D. P., Bates, M. L., Gallo, J. R., & Strother, E. A. (2011). Incoming dental students’ expectations and acceptance of an electronic textbook program. Journal of Dental Education, 75(5), 646–652.Google Scholar
- Caverly, D. C., Orlando, V. P., & Mullen, J. L. (2000). Textbook study reading. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (pp. 105–147). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
- Devolder, A., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2012). Supporting self-regulated learning in computer-based learning environments: Systematic review of effects of scaffolding in the domain of science education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 557–573. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00476.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fischer, L., Hilton, J., III, Robinson, T. J., & Wiley, D. A. (2015). A multi-institutional study of the impact of open textbook adoption on the learning outcomes of post-secondary students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(3), 159–172. doi: 10.1007/s12528-015-9101-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A., & Baek, J. Y. (2008). Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kim, M., Yoo, K., Park, C., & Yoo, J. (2010). Development of a digital textbook standard format based on XML. In T. Kim, & H. Adeli (Eds.), Advances in computer science and information technology (Vol. 6059, No. 2010, pp. 363–377). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-13577-4_32.
- Landøy, A., Repanovici, A., & Gastinger, A. (2015, October). The more they tried it the less they liked it: Norwegian and Romanian student’s response to electronic course material. In European conference on information literacy (pp. 455–463). Springer.Google Scholar
- Macmillan. (2015). What can Launchpad do for you? Retrieved July 22, 2015 from http://www.macmillanhighered.com/Catalog/elearningbrowsebymediatype/LaunchPad.
- Morrison, G., Ross, S., & Kemp, J. (2007). Designing effective instruction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In J. Van Den Ekker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 52–66). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (2006). Educational design research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Van Horne, S., Russell, J. E., & Schuh, K. L. (2015). Assessment with e-textbook analytics. EDUCAUSE center for analysis and research. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/assessment-e-textbook-analytics.
- Wang, S. K., Hsu, H. Y., Campbell, T., Coster, D. C., & Longhurst, M. (2014). An investigation of middle school science teachers and students use of technology inside and outside of classrooms: Considering whether digital natives are more technology savvy than their teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(5), 637–662. doi: 10.1007/s11423-014-9355-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. Metacognition in educational theory and Practice, 93, 27–30.Google Scholar