Linking serious game narratives with pedagogical theories and pedagogical design strategies
- 521 Downloads
Narrative-based serious games present pedagogical content and interventions through an interactive narrative. To ensure effective learning in such kind of serious games, designers are not only faced with the challenge of creating a compelling narrative, but also with the additional challenge of incorporating suitable pedagogical strategies. Therefore, development teams must consist of a multidisciplinary group including storytellers, technical staff and pedagogical experts to make sure that suitable pedagogical strategies are incorporated into the narrative. In this paper, the authors show how the Domain Specific Modeling Language ATTAC-L, for modeling the narrative of a serious game, allows creating the link between the processes of pedagogical design and narrative modeling by means of an elaborate annotation system. As such, this modeling language enables different experts to concentrate on the aspects related to their field of expertise without losing oversight of the serious game as a whole. More in particular, we will show how the annotation system can be used to document and integrate the use of a well-grounded pedagogical theory, Social Cognitive Theory, for achieving the goals of a serious game, as well as when the serious game is part of a program developed by means of a well-grounded design strategy, Intervention Mapping Protocol.
KeywordsSerious games Narratives Pedagogical design strategy Pedagogical theory Intervention Mapping Protocol Social Cognitive Theory ATTAC-L Domain Specific Modeling Language Annotations
This research was funded by IWT (Institute for Science and Technology) (http://www.iwt.be) under the Friendly ATTAC project. We also like to thank our colleagues of the Friendly ATTAC project for the fruitful cooperation resulting in a lot of improvements for ATTAC-L.
This study was funded by IWT-SBO (Grant number 110051).
- Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
- Arnab, S., & Clarke, S. (2016). Towards a trans-disciplinary methodology for a game-based intervention development process. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 279–312.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development. Volume 6 six theories of child development (pp. 1–60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Barab, S. A., Gresalfi, M. S., & Arici, A. (2009). Transformational play: Why educators should care about games. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 76–80.Google Scholar
- Bartholomew, L. K., Parcel, G. S., Kok, G., Gottlieb, N. H., & Fernandez, M. E. (2011). Planning health promotion program: An intervention mapping approach (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Beatty, I. D. (2014). Gaming the system: Video games as a theoretical framework for instructional design. ArXiv preprint arXiv:1401.6716.
- Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Book 1: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.Google Scholar
- Burns, J. M., Webb, M., Durkin, L. A., & Hickie, I. B. (2010). Reach Out Central: A serious game designed to engage young men to improve mental health and wellbeing. Medical Journal of Australia, 192(11), S27.Google Scholar
- Catalano, C. E., Luccini, A. M., & Mortara, M. (2014). Guidelines for an effective design of serious games. International Journal of Serious Games, 1(1). doi: 10.17083/ijsg.v1i1.8.
- Dondlinger, M. J. (2007). Educational video game design: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Educational Technology, 4(1), 21–31.Google Scholar
- Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Friendly ATTAC (2012). Friendly ATTAC. Retrieved from: http://www.friendlyattac.be/en/.
- Gage, N. L., & Berliner, D. C. (1975). Educational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
- Gagne, R. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction Robert Gagné. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
- Göbel, S., Mehm, F., Radke, S., & Steinmetz, R. (2009). 80 days: Adaptive digital storytelling for digital educational games. In Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Story-Telling and Educational Games (STEG’09) (Vol. 498, No. 498).Google Scholar
- Göbel, S., Salvatore, L., & Konrad, R. (2008). StoryTec: A digital storytelling platform for the authoring and experiencing of interactive and non-linear stories. In Automated solutions for cross media content and multi-channel distribution, 2008. AXMEDIS’08. International Conference on (pp. 103–110). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Göransson, B., Gulliksen, J., & Boivie, I. (2003). The usability design process: Integrating user-centered systems design in the software development process. Software Process Improvement and Practice: Special Issue on Bridging the Process and Practice Gaps Between Software Engineering and Human Computer Interaction, 8(2), 111–131.Google Scholar
- Gunter, G., Kenny, R. F., & Vick, E. H. (2006). A case for a formal design paradigm for serious games. The Journal of the International Digital Media and Arts Association, 3(1), 93–105.Google Scholar
- Hergenhahn, B. R. (1988). Introduction to the theories of learning (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Hirdes, E. M., Thillainathan, N., & Leimeister, J. M. (2012). Towards modeling educational objectives in serious games. In Pedagogically-driven Serious Games 2012 Saarbrücken, Germany (Vol. 898, pp. 11–14). CEUR Workshop Proceedings.Google Scholar
- Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status, 1, 383–434.Google Scholar
- Kickmeier-Rust, M. D., Schwarz, D., Albert, D., Verpoorten, D., Castaigne, J. L., & Bopp, M. (2006). The elektra project: Towards a new learning experience. In USAB (pp. 19–48).Google Scholar
- Kirkley, S. E., Tomblin, S., & Kirkley, J. (2005). Instructional design authoring support for the development of serious games and mixed reality training. In Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference (I/ITSEC).Google Scholar
- Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Koper, R., & Olivier, B. (2004). Representing the learning design of units of learning. Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 97–111.Google Scholar
- Lindley, C. A. (2005). Story and narrative structures in computer games. In B. Bushoff (Ed.), Developing Interactive Narrative Content. sagas_sagasnet_reader. Munich: High Text Verlag.Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, T. L., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1978). Social learning and cognition. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Sallis, J. F., Owen, N., & Fisher, E. B. (2008). Ecological models of health behavior. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 465–486.Google Scholar
- Slavin, R. E. (1994). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Steinkuehler, C., Squire, K., & Barab, S. (Eds.). (2012). Games, learning, and society: Learning and meaning in the digital age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Torrente, J., Del Blanco, Á., Marchiori, E. J., Moreno-Ger, P., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2010). < e-Adventure > : Introducing educational games in the learning process. In IEEE EDUCON 2010 Conference (pp. 1121–1126). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Tran, C., George, S., & Marfisi-Schottman, I. (2010). EDoS: An authoring environment for serious games. Design based on three models. In Proceedings of ECGBL 2010 the 4th European conference on games based learning. 4th ECGBL (pp. 393–402).Google Scholar
- Valcke, M. (2005). Onderwijskunde als ontwerpwetenschap (3rd ed.). Gent: Academia Press.Google Scholar
- Van Broeckhoven, F., & De Troyer, O. (2013). ATTAC-L: A modeling language for educational virtual scenarios in the context of preventing cyber bullying. In Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH), 2013 IEEE 2nd International Conference on (pp. 1–8). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Van Broeckhoven, F., & De Troyer, O. (2014). Specifying the pedagogical aspects of narrative-based digital learning games using annotations. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on the foundations of digital games. Society for the advancement of the science of digital games.Google Scholar
- Van Broeckhoven, F., Vlieghe, J., & De Troyer, O. (2015). Using a controlled natural language for specifying the narratives of serious games. In International conference on interactive digital storytelling (pp. 142–153). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Weiss, S., Müller, W., Spierling, U., & Steimle, F. (2005). Scenejo–an interactive storytelling platform. In International Conference on Virtual Storytelling (pp. 77–80). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar