Use of the flipped classroom instructional model in higher education: instructors’ perspectives
The flipped classroom model is an instructional model in which students learn basic subject matter knowledge prior to in-class meetings, then come to the classroom for active learning experiences. Previous research has shown that the flipped classroom model can motivate students towards active learning, can improve their higher-order thinking skills, and can improve their collaborative learning skills. However, most current studies focus on students’ experiences with flipped classroom learning. Because so few studies address the instructor’s perspective, and instructors’ perspectives on technology integration can directly influence their practice of incorporating technology in instruction, this study sought to focus on instructors. This paper is a qualitative case study that reveals instructors’ experiences and perspectives on using the flipped classroom model in instruction. Structured interviews were conducted with eight faculty members who either previously had used or planned to use the flipped classroom model. Findings include instructors’ perceived definitions of the flipped classroom, how they improved teaching and learning by using the flipped classroom model, their perceived benefits and challenges of the flipped classroom, and perceived approaches of using it in an effective way. The participants also recommended peer assistance among instructors as valuable support to implement the flipped classroom model in instruction successfully.
KeywordsFlipped classroom Active learning Students Instructor
This study has been reviewed and certified by the IRB. The authors give thanks to all the staff at Teaching and Learning Center at The University of Tennessee for their supports in this study.
The study was accomplished with no institutional, private or corporate support funding.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no potential conflict of interest with any of the software or tools mentioned in this study.
- Albert, J., Blanchard, M., Kier, M., Carrier, S., & Gardner, G. (2014). Supporting teachers’ technology integration: A descriptive analysis of social and teaching presence in technical support sessions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(2), 137–165.Google Scholar
- Alvarez, B. (2012). Flipping the classroom: Homework in class, lessons at home. Education Digest, 77(8), 18–21.Google Scholar
- Baker, J. W. (2000). The “classroom flip”: Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side. In Paper presented at the 11th international conference on college teaching and learning, Jacksonville, FL.Google Scholar
- Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.Google Scholar
- Bland, L. (2006). Applying flip/inverted classroom model in electrical engineering to establish life-long learning. In Paper presented at the American Society of Engineering Education Conference and Exposition. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Brame, C. J. (2013). Flipping the classroom. Retrieved from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/flipping-the-classroom/.
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Demetry, C. (2010). Work in progress—an innovation merging “classroom flip” and team-based learning. In Paper presented at the 40th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Dove, A. (2013). Students’ perceptions of learning in a flipped statistics class. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2013 (pp. 393–398).Google Scholar
- Frydenberg, M. (2013). Flipping excel. Information Systems Education Journal, 11(1), 63–73.Google Scholar
- Gerstein, J. (2011). The flipped classroom model: A full picture. Retrieved from http://usergeneratededucation.wordpress.com/2011/06/13/the-flipped-classroom-model-a-full-picture/.
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
- Hawkins, J. (1997). Imagine the possibilities: The world at your fingertips. In P. Burness & W. Snider (Eds.), Learn and live (pp. 212–215). Nicasio, CA: The George Lucas Educational Foundation.Google Scholar
- Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.Google Scholar
- Lynch, D., Altschuler, G. C., & McClure, P. (2002). Professors should embrace technology in courses…and colleges must create technology plans. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 48(19), B15.Google Scholar
- Malicky, D. M., Lord, S. M., & Huang, M. Z. (2007). A design methodology for choosing an optimal pedagogy: The pedagogy decision matrix. International Journal of Engineering Education, 23(2), 325–337.Google Scholar
- Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Punch, K. F. (2005). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Shea, P., Pickett, A., & Li, C. S. (2005). Increasing access to higher education: A study of the diffusion of online teaching among 913 college faculty. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Education, 6(2), 1–27.Google Scholar
- Spotts, T. H. (1999). Embedding ubiquitous use of technology. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 2(4), 92–99.Google Scholar
- Stake, R. E. (1998). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Strayer, J. F. (2007). The effect of the classroom flip on the learning environment: A comparison of learning activity in a traditional classroom and a flip classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Columbus: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
- Wagner, D., Laforge, P., & Cripps, C. (2013). Lecture material retention: A first trial report on flipped classroom strategies in electronic systems engineering at the University of Regina. In Paper presented at the Canadian engineering education association, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
- Warter-Perez, N., & Dong, J. (2012). Flipping the classroom: How to embed inquiry and design projects into a digital engineering lecture. In Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Pacific South West (ASEE-PSW) section conference, San Luis Obispo, CA.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Zappe, S., Messner, J., Litzinger, T., & Lee, H. W. (2009). “Flipping” the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course. In Paper presented at the American society for engineering education annual conference and exhibition, Austin, TX.Google Scholar