Advertisement

Journal of Computing in Higher Education

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 236–260 | Cite as

Are integrated portfolio systems the answer? An evaluation of a web-based portfolio system to improve preservice teachers’ reflective thinking skills

  • Diler Oner
  • Emine Adadan
Article
First Online:

Abstract

This study investigated the effectiveness of an integrated web-based portfolio system, namely the BOUNCE System, which primarily focuses on improving preservice teachers’ reflective thinking skills. BOUNCE©, the software component of the system, was designed and developed to support a teaching practice model including a cycle of activities to be performed in teaching practicum courses. The effectiveness of the BOUNCE System was evaluated by investigating the development of preservice teachers’ reflective thinking skills over time and the usability of the BOUNCE software. Preservice teachers demonstrated both high- and low-level reflective thinking indicators throughout the semester. A statistically significant change was detected in the number of high-level reflective thinking indicators from the first teaching experience to the second. Furthermore, the usability ratings of the BOUNCE© were above average. These findings highlighted the importance of integrated portfolio systems that combine technological and pedagogical elements to develop reflective thinking.

Keywords

Web-based portfolios Preservice teacher education Reflective thinking skills Software development 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by Career Research Grant Award No. 111K523 from TUBITAK, The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ayan, D., & Seferoglu, G. (2011). Using electronic portfolios to promote reflective thinking in language teacher education. Educational Studies, 37(5), 513–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bain, J. D., Mills, C., Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2002). Developing reflection on practice through journal writing: Impacts of variations in the focus and level of feedback. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(2), 171–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett, H. (2001). Electronic portfolios = Multimedia development + portfolio development: The electronic portfolio development process. In B. L. Cambridge, S. Kahn, D. P. Thompkins, & K. B. Yancey (Eds.), Electronic portfolios: Emerging practices in student, faculty, and institutional learning (pp. 110–116). Washington, DC: American Association of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  4. Barrett, H. (2011). Balancing the two faces of e-portfolios. Retrieved on June 3, 2015 from http://electronicportfolios.com/balance/Balancing2.htm.
  5. Barrett, H. (2012). Categories of ePortfolio tools. Retrieved on August 12, 2015 from http://electronicportfolios.com/categories.
  6. Barrett, H., & Garrett, N. (2009). Online personal learning environments: Structuring electronic portfolios for lifelong and life wide learning. On the Horizon, 17(2), 142–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becta (2007). Impact study of e-portfolios on learning. Retrieved on June 3, 2015 from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1468/7/becta_2007_eportfolios_summary_Redacted.pdf.
  8. Bird, T. (1990). The schoolteacher’s portfolio: An essay on possibilities. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Handbook of teacher evaluation: Elementary and secondary personnel (2nd ed., pp. 241–256). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blandford, A., Keith, S., Connell, I., & Edwards, H. (2004). Analytical usability evaluation for digital libraries: A case study. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 27–36).Google Scholar
  10. Brandt, C. (2008). Integrating feedback and reflection in teacher preparation. ELT Journal, 62(1), 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, S. (2015). The impact of the ePortfolio tool on the process: Functional decisions of a new genre. Theory into Practice, 54(4), 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarà, M. (2015). What is reflection? Looking for clarity in an ambiguous notion. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Dahlstrom, E., Walker, J. D., & Dziuban, C. (2013). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2013. Louisville, CO: Educause Center for Analysis and Research. https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERS1302/ERS1302.pdf.
  15. Dana, T. M., & Tippins, D. J. (1998). Portfolios, reflection and educating prospective teachers of science. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobins (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 719–732). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: DC Heath.Google Scholar
  17. Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London, England: SAGE.Google Scholar
  18. Freese, A. R. (1999). The role of reflection on preservice teachers’ development in the context of a professional development school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(8), 895–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fuller, F. F., & Bown, O. (1975). Becoming a teacher. In K. Ryan (Ed.), Teacher education, 74thyearbook of the national society for the study of education (pp. 25–52). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gao, S., Coldwell-Neilson, J., & Goscinski, A. (2014). Managing learning evidence using ePortfolio. Creative Education, 5, 1585–1590. doi: 10.4236/ce.2014.517175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garrett, N. (2011). An eportfolio design supporting ownership, social learning, and ease of use. Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 182–202.Google Scholar
  22. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  23. Grimmett, P. P., MacKinnon, A. M., Erickson, G. L., & Riecken, T. J. (1990). Reflective practice in teacher education. In R. T. Clift, W. R. Houston, & M. C. Pugach (Eds.), Encouraging reflective practice in education: An analysis of issues and programs (pp. 20–38). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Orsmond, P. (2005). Reflecting on reflective practices within peer observation. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hudson, P. (2007). Examining mentors’ practices for enhancing pre-service teachers’ pedagogical development in mathematics and science. Mentoring ve Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 15(2), 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Janosik, S. M., & Frank, T. E. (2013). Using ePortfolios to measure student learning in a graduate preparation program in higher education. International Journal of ePortfolio, 3(1), 13–20.Google Scholar
  28. Jay, J. K., & Johnson, K. L. (2002). Capturing complexity: A typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson, R. S., Mims-Cox, J. S., & Doyle-Nichols, A. (2006). Developing portfolios in education: A guide to reflection, inquiry, and assessment. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Kabilan, M. K., & Khan, M. A. (2012). Assessing pre-service English language teachers’ learning using e-portfolios: Benefits, challanges and competencies gained. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1007–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Karsenti, T., Dumouchel, G., & Collin, S. (2014). The eportfolio as support for the professional development of preservice teachers: A theoretical and practical overview. International Journal of Computers and Technology, 12(5), 3487–3495.Google Scholar
  32. Kind, V. A. (2009). Conflict in your head: An exploration of trainee science teachers’ subject matter knowledge development and its impact on teacher self-confidence. International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1529–1562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Larrivee, B. (2008). Development of a tool to assess teachers’ level of reflective practice. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 9(3), 341–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lewis, J. R. (1995). IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7(1), 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lin, Q. (2008). Preservice teachers’ learning experiences of constructing e-portfolios online. The Internet and Higher Education, 11, 194–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mitchell, P. P. (2007). A step-by-step guide to usability testing. Secaucus, NJ: Iuniverse Inc.Google Scholar
  38. Moran, W., Vozzo, L., Reid, J. A., Pietsch, M., & Hatton, C. (2013). How can technology make this work? Preservice teachers, off-campus learning and digital portfolios. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(5), 116–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oakley, G., Pegrum, M., & Johnston, S. (2014). Introducing e-portfolios to pre-service teachers as tools for reflection and growth: Lessons learnt. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oner, D., & Adadan, E. (2010). Use of web-based portfolios as tools for reflection in preservice teacher education: A preliminary analysis. In Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
  41. Oner, D., & Adadan, E. (2011). Use of web-based portfolios as tools for reflection in preservice teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(5), 477–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parker, M., Ndoye, A., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2012). Qualitative analysis of student perceptions of ePortfolios in a teacher education program. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(3), 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parkes, K. A., Dredger, K. S., & Hicks, D. (2013). ePortfolio as a measure of reflective practice. International Journal of ePortolio, 3(2), 99–115.Google Scholar
  44. Parsons, M., & Stephenson, M. (2005). Developing reflective practice in student teachers: Collaboration and critical partnerships. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Posnanski, T. J. (2002). Professional development programs for elementary science teachers: An analysis of teacher self-efficacy beliefs and a professional development model. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(2), 189–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sargeant, J., Mann, K., Sinclair, D., Van der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. (2008). Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13(3), 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sellars, M. (2014). Reflective practice for teachers. London: Sage publications.Google Scholar
  48. Sempowicz, T., & Hudson, P. (2012). Mentoring pre-service teachers’ reflective practices towards producing teaching outcomes. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 10(2), 52–64.Google Scholar
  49. Stefani, L., Mason, R., & Pegler, C. (2007). The educational potential of e-portfolios: Supporting personal development and reflective learning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Stockero, S. L. (2008). Using a video-based curriculum to develop a reflective stance in prospective mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(5), 373–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Strudler, N., & Wetzel, K. (2011). Electronic portfolios in teacher education: Forging a middle ground. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(2), 161–173. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2011.10782584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(3), 205–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wedman, J. M., & Martin, M. W. (1986). Exploring the development of reflective thinking through journal writing. Reading Improvement, 23(1), 68–71.Google Scholar
  54. Willard-Holt, C., & Bottomley, D. (2000). Reflectivity and effectiveness of preservice teachers in a unique field experience. Action in Teacher Education, 21(2), 76–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wolf, K. (1994). Teaching portfolios: Capturing the complexity of teaching. In L. Ingravrson & R. Chadbourne (Eds.), Valuing teachers’ work: New directions in teacher appraisal (pp. 112–136). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Education and Educational Technology, Faculty of EducationBogazici UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Secondary Science and Mathematics Education, Faculty of EducationBogazici UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options