Advertisement

Journal of Computing in Higher Education

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 1–17 | Cite as

The effects of locus of control on university students’ mobile learning adoption

  • Jung-Wen Hsia
Article
First Online:

Abstract

Since mobile devices have become cheaper, easily accessible, powerful, and popular and the cost of wireless access has declined gradually, mobile learning (m-learning) has begun to spread rapidly. To further improve the effectiveness and efficiency of m-learning for university students, it is critical to understand whether they use m-learning. However, there has been little research on investigating the factors influencing university students’ adoption of m-learning. This study empirically investigates the factors that affect students’ acceptance of m-learning by integrating locus of control, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use (from the technology acceptance model), and perceived behavioral control (from the theory of planned behavior) into the theoretical model. This study is one of the first to examine the effects of locus of control on m-learning adoption. Data were collected from 176 undergraduate students at a large, public, research-intensive university located in Hsinchu, Taiwan. The partial least squares approach was used to evaluate the explanatory power and causal links of the model, and it was found that locus of control can influence students’ beliefs (perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived behavioral control) toward m-learning. The three beliefs all had a significant effect on behavioral intention to use m-learning. Future research and the practical implications of the findings are discussed.

Keywords

Locus of control University students m-Learning Mobile learning Technology acceptance model Perceived behavioral control 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Author Jung-Wen Hsia declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Adeoye, B., & Wentling, R. M. (2007). The relationship between national culture and the usability of an e-learning system. International Journal on E-learning, 6(1), 119–146.Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 244–254.Google Scholar
  5. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., & Beyer, J. (1977). Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(3), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burton-Jones, A., & Hubona, G. S. (2006). The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 706–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cakir, O., & Simsek, N. (2010). A comparative analysis of the effects of computer and paper-based personalization on student achievement. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1524–1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, B., Sivo, S., Seilhamer, R., Sugar, A., & Mao, J. (2013). User acceptance of mobile technology: A campus-wide implementation of blackboard’s mobile™ learn application. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49(3), 327–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1054–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Coovert, M. D., & Goldstein, M. (1980). Locus of control as a predictor of users’ attitude toward computers. Psychological Reports, 47(3f), 1167–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cox, J. (2012). Information systems user security: a structured model of the knowledge-doing gap. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1849–1858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Drennan, J., Kennedy, J., & Pisarski, A. (2005). Factors affecting student attitudes toward flexible online learning in management education. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(6), 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., & Schlosser, A. E. (2003). Locus of control, web use, and consumer attitudes toward internet regulation. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 22(1), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hsia, J.-W., Chang, C.-C., & Tseng, A.-H. (2014). Effects of individuals’ locus of control and computer self-efficacy on their e-learning acceptance in high-tech companies. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(1), 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hsieh, Y.-H., & Wang, M.-L. (2012). The moderating role of personality in HRM- from the influence of job stress on job burnout perspective. International Management Review, 8(2), 5–18.Google Scholar
  24. Huang, R.-T., Hsiao, C.-H., Tang, T.-W., & Lien, T.-C. (2014). Exploring the moderating role of perceived flexibility advantages in mobile learning continuance intention (MLCI). The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(3), 140–157.Google Scholar
  25. Hwang, Y. (2005). Investigating enterprise systems adoption: uncertainty avoidance, intrinsic motivation, and the technology acceptance model. European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 150–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Igbaria, M., & Iivari, J. (1995). The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 23(6), 587–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Joo, Y. J., Lee, H. W., & Ham, Y. (2014). Integrating user interface and personal innovativeness into the TAM for mobile learning in Cyber University. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(2), 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, J. (2013). Locus of control, self-efficacy, and task value as predictors of learning outcome in an online university context. Computers & Education, 62, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kay, R. H. (1990). The relation between locus of control and computer literacy. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 22(4), 464–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Khanh, N. T. V., & Gim, G. (2014). Factors influencing mobile-learning adoption intention: An empirical investigation in high education. Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kirkpatrick, M. A., Stant, K., Downes, S., & Gaither, L. (2008). Perceived locus of control and academic performance: Broadening the construct’s applicability. Journal of College Student Development, 49(5), 486–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, M. J., & Chan, A. (2007). Reducing the effects of isolation and promoting inclusivity for distance learners through podcasting. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), 85–105.Google Scholar
  34. Lefcourt, H. M. (1982). Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Legris, P. J., Ingham, P., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers & Education, 48(2), 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu, Y., Li, H., & Carlsson, C. (2010). Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1211–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lu, Y., Zhou, T., & Wang, B. (2009). Exploring Chinese users’ acceptance of instant messaging using the theory of planned behavior, the technology acceptance model, and the flow theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mac Callum, K., & Jeffrey, L. (2013). The influence of students’ ICT skills and their adoption of mobile learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3), 303–314.Google Scholar
  40. Mac Callum, K., & Jeffrey, L. (2014). Comparing the role of ICT literacy and anxiety in the adoption of mobile learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maddi, S. R. (1989). Personality theories: A comparative analysis (5th ed.). Chicago, IL: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  42. McCoy, S., Galletta, D. F., & King, W. R. (2007). Applying TAM across cultures: the need for caution. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(1), 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nistor, N., Lerche, T., Weinberger, A., Ceobanu, C., & Heymann, O. (2014). Towards the integration of culture into the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 36–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ong, C. S., Lai, J. Y., & Wang, Y. S. (2004). Factors affecting engineers’ acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies. Information & Management, 41(6), 795–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Presley, A., & Presley, T. (2009). Factors influencing student acceptance and use of academic portals. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(3), 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Saadé, R., & Bahli, B. (2005). The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42(2), 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sharples, M. (2002). Disruptive devices: Mobile technology for conversational learning. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 12(5), 504–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Spector, P. E. (1982). Behavior in organizations as a function of employee’s locus of control. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 482–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Šumak, B., Heričko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2067–2077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S., & Budgen, D. (2010). Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 52(5), 463–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Urbach, N., & Ahlemann, F. (2010). Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 11(2), 5–40.Google Scholar
  53. Valecha, G. K., & Ostrom, T. M. (1974). An abbreviated measure of internal-external locus of control. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38(4), 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yang, S. (2013). An emerging learning mode: The effects of instrumental beliefs, extrinsic influences and personal traits on undergraduate students’ adoption of mobile learning. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications, 7(5), 697–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of International BusinessChung Hua UniversityHsinchuTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options