Advertisement

Journal of Computing in Higher Education

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 132–142 | Cite as

Utopian Universities: a technicist’s dream

  • Alejandro Armellini
  • David Hawkridge
Article
First Online:

Abstract

Following a brief introduction, our paper is in four main sections. First, we lay out the points on which we agree with James Mazoué’s views expressed in ‘The Deconstructed Campus’. Second, we offer a critique of his views. Third, we consider evidence-based research opportunities for building universities that may incorporate ideas along the lines Mazoué proposes. Fourth, we summarise foreseeable barriers to creating such institutions. Thus our first and second sections are a direct response to Mazoué, while the third and fourth go beyond what he has written. We conclude that Mazoué’s arguments can only be sustained by adopting a technicist’s view, by seeking to control reality. We assert that a technicist is a utopian. Our view is that higher education must be modernised, to improve students’ learning, but through evolution rather than revolution.

Keywords

University reform Teaching and learning Technicism Utopias Technology Future 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Armellini, A., & Aiyegbayo, O. (2010). Learning design and assessment with e-tivities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 922–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernanke, B. S. (2010). Causes of the recent financial and economic crisis. Statement before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, Washington, D.C. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Available at http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/testimony/bernanke20100902a.htm.
  3. Berness, M. L. (1971). Journey through Utopia. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  4. Brodle, L. M., & Porter, M. (2008). Engaging distance and on-campus students in problem-based learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(4), 433–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, M. (2011). Learning analytics: the coming third wave. Educause, Boulder, Colorado. Available at http://www.educause.edu/Resources/LearningAnalyticsTheComingThir/227287.
  6. Buckingham-Shum, S. (2011). Personal communication.Google Scholar
  7. Claeys, G. (2011). Searching for Utopia: The history of an idea. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  8. Deepwell, F., & Malik, S. (2008). On campus, but out of class: an investigation into students’ experiences of learning technologies in their self-directed study. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 16(1), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duval, E. (2011). Attention please! Learning analytics for visualization and recommendation. Proceedings of LAK11: 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge 2011, February 28-March 2, Banff, Canada. Available at https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/315113/1/la2.pdf.
  10. Educause, (2011). 2011 Horizon Report. Available at http://www.educause.edu/Resources/2011HorizonReport/223122.
  11. Havelock, R. G., & Huberman, A. M. (1977). Solving educational problems: The theory and reality of innovation in developing countries. Paris: Unesco.Google Scholar
  12. Illich, I. (1971). Deschooling society. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  13. Kiley, K. (2011). Where universities can be cut. Inside Higher Education, September 16. Available at http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/09/16/unc_berkeley_cornell_experience_show_where_administrative_cuts_can_be_made.
  14. Murrell, A. J., Forte-Trammell, S., & Bing, D. A. (2008). Intelligent mentoring: How IBM creates value through people, knowledge and relationships. Indianapolis: IBM Press.Google Scholar
  15. Nie, M., Armellini, A., Randall, R., Harrington, S., & Barklamb, K. (2010). The role of podcasting in effective curriculum renewal. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 18(2), 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ofek, E., & Richardson, M. (2001). Dotcom mania: the rise and fall of Internet stock prices. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 8630. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w8630.
  17. Paul, J., & Strbiak, C. A. (1997). The ethics of strategic ambiguity. The Journal of Business Communication, 34(2), 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Salmon, G., Jones, S., & Armellini, A. (2008). Building institutional capability in e-learning design. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 16(2), 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schumacher, E. F. (1963). Small is beautiful. London: Blond and Briggs.Google Scholar
  20. Schuurman, E. (1997). Philosophical and ethical problems of technicism and genetic engineering. Society for Philosophy and Technology, 3(1). Available at http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v3n1/schuurman.html.
  21. Shortcliffe, E. H. (1976). Computer-based medical consultations: MYCIN. New York: American Elsevier.Google Scholar
  22. Skinner, B. F. (1962). Walden two. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Stankov, S., Glavinic, V., & Rosic, M. (Eds.). (2011). Intelligent tutoring systems in e-learning environments: Design, implementation and evaluation. Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LeicesterEast LeicesterUK
  2. 2.Leighton BuzzardUK

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options