Framework for asynchronous discussion design decisions: applied principles from special issue authors
- 233 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
After a discussion of the state of both misaligned and informative online and distance education research, the authors in this special issue (hereafter called the collective) extract evidence-based principles about strategies that work. Both are addressed in this article. First, their criticisms centered on the value of comparative research. Those discussions are compared to debates by the International Board of Standards for Training Performance and Instruction (ibstpi). Second, to summarize and synthesize the evidence-based principles on interactions of online distance learners with content, peers and instructors, I offer a framework for planning, developing, and executing online distance education learning activities. The guidelines from the collective are organized within this framework for making asynchronous discussion design decisions. Finally, a redesign of an existing online distance education course exemplifies how these evidence based principles may be applied in a real example.
Keywords
Distance education Asynchronous discussion strategies Online instruction and learningReferences
- Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R., Bures, E., Borokhovski, E., & Tamim, R. (2011). Interaction in distance education and online learning: Using evidence and theory to improve practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. doi: 10.1007/s12528-011-9043-x.
- Beaudoin, M., Kurtz, G., Jung, I., Suzuki, K., & Grabowski, B. (manuscript in preparation). Online learner competencies: Development and validation study.Google Scholar
- Bol, L., & Garner, J. (2011). Challenges in supporting self-regulation in distance education environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. doi: 10.1007/s12528-011-9046-7.
- Ertmer, P. A., Sadaf, A., & Ertmer, D. J. (2011). Student content interactions in online courses: The role of question prompts in facilitating higher-level engagement with course content. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. doi: 10.1007/s12528-011-9047-6.
- Kanuka, K. (2011). Interaction and the online distance classroom: Do instructional methods effect the quality of interaction? Journal of Computing in Higher Education. doi: 10.1007/s12528-011-9049-4.
- Klein, J., Spector, M., Grabowski, B., & de la Teja, I. (2004). Instructor competencies: Standards for face-to-face, online and blended settings. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Simonson, M., Scholsser, C., & Orellana, A. (2011). Distance education research: A review of the literature. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. doi: 10.1007/s12528-011-9045-8.
References cited from this issue
- Andrews, J. (1980). The verbal structure of teacher questions: Its impact on class discussion. POD Quarterly: Journal of Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education, 2(3–4), 129–163.Google Scholar
- Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
- Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 368(5), 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Mayer, R. E. (2008). Learning and instruction (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A Motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar