Advertisement

Journal of Computing in Higher Education

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 1–17 | Cite as

Examining mobile learning trends 2003–2008: a categorical meta-trend analysis using text mining techniques

  • Jui-Long Hung
  • Ke Zhang
Article
First Online:

Abstract

This study investigated the longitudinal trends of academic articles in Mobile Learning (ML) using text mining techniques. One hundred and nineteen (119) refereed journal articles and proceedings papers from the SCI/SSCI database were retrieved and analyzed. The taxonomies of ML publications were grouped into twelve clusters (topics) and four domains, based on abstract analysis using text mining. Results include basic bibliometric statistics, trends in frequency of each topic over time, predominance in each topic by country, and preferences for each topic by journal. Key findings include the following: (a) ML articles increased from 8 in 2003 to 36 in 2008; (b) the most popular domain in current ML is Effectiveness, Evaluation, and Personalized Systems; (c) Taiwan is most prolific in five of the twelve ML clusters; (d) ML research is at the Early Adopters stage; and (e) studies in strategies and framework will likely produce a bigger share of publication in the field of ML.

Keywords

Mobile learning M-learning Text mining Bibliometrics Mobile learning trends 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Attewell, J. (2005). Mobile technologies and learning: A technology update and m-learning project summary. London, UK: Learning and Skills Development Agency. Retrieved from http://www.m-learning.org/docs/The%20m-learning%20project%20-%20technology%20update%20and%20project%20summary.pdf.
  2. Attewell, J., & Savill-Smith, C. (2004). Learning with mobile devices: Research and development. London, UK: Learning and Skills Development Agency.Google Scholar
  3. Bernard, R., Abrami, P. L., Lou, Y., & Borokhovski, E. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74, 379–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Evans, C. (2008). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers & Education, 50(2), 491–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Executive Yuan of the Republic of China. (2005). National Science and Technology Program for e-learning [website]. Retrieved from http://elnpweb.ncu.edu.tw/old/english/english1.htm.
  7. Fayyad, U. M., Pitatesky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P., & Uthurasamy, R. (1996). Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining, AAAI/MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Feldman, R., & Dagan, I. (1995). Knowledge discovery in textual databases (KDT). Proceedings of the first international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD-95), 112–117.Google Scholar
  9. Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction (6th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  10. Geddes, S. (2004). Mobile learning in the 21st century: Benefit for learners. Knowledge Tree e-journal. Retrieved from https://olt.qut.edu.au/udf/OLTCONFERENCEPAPERS/gen/static/papers/Cobcroft_OLT2006_paper.pdf.
  11. Keshaval, G. A. G., & Gowda, M. P. (2008). ACM transaction on information systems (1989–2006): A bibliometric study. Information Studies, 14(4), 223–234.Google Scholar
  12. Gwet, K. L. (2010). Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters. Gaithersburg, MD: Advanced Analytics, LLC.Google Scholar
  13. Hung, J. L. (2010). Trends of e-learning research from 2000–2008: use of text mining and bibliometrics. British Journal of Educational Technology. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/%28ISSN%291467-8535/earlyview.
  14. Jain, A. K., & Dubes, R. C. (1988). Algorithms for clustering data. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, S. D., Aragon, S. R., & Shaik, N. (2000). Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(1), 29–49.Google Scholar
  16. Kim, P., Miranda, T., & Olaciregui, C. (2008). Pocket school: Exploring mobile technology as a sustainable literacy education option for underserved indigenous children in Latin America. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(4), 435–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kulik, C. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lehner, F., & Nösekabel, H. (2002). The role of mobile devices in e-learning: First experiences with a wireless e-learning environment. Paper presented at IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, Växjö, Sweden.Google Scholar
  19. Lockwood, F. (2007). Forword. In G. Conole & M. Oliver (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: Themes, methods, and impacts on practice (pp. xvi–xvii). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Mihalca, L., & Miclea, M. (2007). Current trends in educational technology research. Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 11(1), 115–129.Google Scholar
  21. Mogil, S. J., Simmonds, K., & Simmonds, J. M. (2009). Pain research from 1975 to 2007: A categorical and bibliometric meta-tend analysis of every research paper published in the journal, Pain. Pain, 142, 48–58.Google Scholar
  22. Motlik, S. (2008). Mobile learning in developing nations. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/564/1071.
  23. Narin, F., Olivastro, D., & Stevens, K. A. (1994). Bibliometrics: Theory, practice and problems. Evaluation Review, 18(1), 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Okubo, Y. (1997). Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems: Methods and examples, STI Working Papers 1997/1, OECD Science, Paris.Google Scholar
  25. Osareh, F. (1996). Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis: A review of literature I. Libri, (46), 149–158.Google Scholar
  26. Polsson, K. (2009). Chronology of handheld computers. Retrieved from http://www.islandnet.com/~kpolsson/handheld/.
  27. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  28. Sharma, S., & Kitchens, F. (2004). Web services architecture for m-learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning (2), 203–216.Google Scholar
  29. Thelwall, M. (2008). Bibliometrics to webometrics. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 605–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Winn, W. D. (2002). Current trends in educational technology research: The study of learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 1(3), 331–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang, K. (2008). Ubiquitous technology for language learning: The U-Japan movement in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 20(2), 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang, K., & Hung, J. L. (2006). E-learning in Taiwan: Policies, practices, and problems. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 2(1), 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang, K., & Hung, J. L. (2009). E-learning in supplemental educational systems in Taiwan: Present status and future challenges. International Journal on E-Learning, 8(4), 49–64.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational TechnologyBoise State UniversityBoiseUSA
  2. 2.Instructional Technology ProgramWayne State UniversityDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options