Advertisement

Journal of Computing in Higher Education

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 114–134 | Cite as

The role of involvement in learning management system success

  • Jane E. KlobasEmail author
  • Tanya J. McGill
Article

Abstract

Learning management systems (LMS) have been adopted by the majority of higher education institutions and research that explores the factors that influence the success of LMS is needed. This paper investigates the roles of student and instructor involvement in LMS success, using the DeLone and McLean (2003) model of information systems success as a framework. Data were gathered by online questionnaire from students enrolled in an Australian university. Involvement was found to be important to LMS success. Student involvement was shown to have a significant effect on the benefits to students of LMS use. The more involved a student is with the LMS site for a course offering, the stronger the benefits they report obtaining from use. On the other hand, student involvement did not have an effect on LMS use. Instructor involvement was found to guide appropriate use, both in terms of the nature of use and the extent of use. Furthermore, instructor involvement was shown to contribute to student benefits by affecting information quality which affects the benefits students receive from use.

Keywords

Learning management systems LMS Information system success Involvement Student engagement System quality 

Supplementary material

12528_2010_9032_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (12 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 13 kb)

References

  1. Aladwani, A. M., & Palvia, P. C. (2002). Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived web quality. Information and Management, 39, 467–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, S. (2001). E-learning developments and experiences. Education + Training, 43(4/5), 240–248.Google Scholar
  3. Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (1989). Rethinking the concept of user involvement. MIS Quarterly, 13(1), 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (1991). User participation and user involvement in information system development. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4, 487–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (1994). Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitude. MIS Quarterly, 18(1), 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baroudi, J. J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1988). A short form measure of user satisfaction and notes on use. Journal of Management Information Systems, 4(4), 44–59.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, R., & Jokivirta, L. (2007). Online learning in universities: Selected data from the 2006 Observatory surveyNovember 2007. The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education (OBHE) [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 9 January 2010 from http://www.obhe.ac.uk.
  8. Blili, S., Raymond, L., & Rivard, S. (1998). Impact of task uncertainty, end-user involvement, and competence on the success of end-user computing. Information and Management, 33, 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Browne, T., Jenkins, M., & Walker, R. (2006). A longitudinal perspective regarding the use of VLEs by higher education institutions in the United Kingdom. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(2), 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burton-Jones, A., Jr, & Straub, D. W. (2006). Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 228–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiu, C. M., Chiu, C. S., & Chang, H. C. (2007). Examining the integrated influence of fairness and quality on learners’ satisfaction and web-based learning continuance intention. Information Systems Journal, 17(3), 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chyung, S. Y., & Vachon, M. (2005). An investigation of the profiles of satisfying and dissatisfying factors in e-learning. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 18(2), 97–114.Google Scholar
  13. Coates, H., James, R., & Baldwin, G. (2005). A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning. Tertiary Education and Management, 11(1), 19–36.Google Scholar
  14. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.Google Scholar
  17. Dillenbourg, P., Schneider, D., & Synteta, P. (2002). Virtual learning environments. In A. Dimitracopoulou (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3rd hellenic conference on information and communication technologies in education (pp. 3–18). Greece: Kastaniotis Editions.Google Scholar
  18. Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1998). Developing a multidimensional measure of system-use in an organizational context. Information and Management, 33(4), 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Etezadi-Amoli, J., & Farhoomand, A. F. (1996). A structural model of end user computing satisfaction and user performance. Information and Management, 30, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goodhue, D. (1995). Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management Science, 41(2), 1827–1844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goodhue, D., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hartwick, J., & Barki, H. (1994). Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science, 40(4), 440–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hayashi, A., Chen, C., Ryan, T., & Wu, J. (2004). The role of social presence and moderating role of computer self efficacy in predicting the continuance usage of e-learning systems. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(2), 139–154.Google Scholar
  25. Hiltz, S. R. (1993). Correlates of learning in a virtual classroom. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39, 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holsapple, C. W., & Lee-Post, A. (2006). Defining, assessing, and promoting e-learning success: An information systems perspective. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(1), 67–85.Google Scholar
  27. Hwang, M. I., & Thorn, R. G. (1999). The effect of user engagement on system success: A meta-analytical integration of research findings. Information and Management, 35, 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klobas, J. E., & Clyde, L. A. (1998). Learning to use the internet in a developing country: Validation of a user model. Libri, 48(3), 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liaw, S.-S., Huang, H.-M., & Chen, G.-D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1066–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. D. (2009). Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions and uses of learning management systems. Computers & Education, 53(3), 686–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Markus, M. L., & Mao, J.-Y. (2004). Participation in development and implementation: Updating an old, tired concept for today’s IS contexts. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5(11–12), 514–544.Google Scholar
  32. McCombs, B. L. (2003). A framework for the redesign of K-12 education in the context of current educational reform. Theory into Practice, 42(2), 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McGill, T., & Hobbs, V. J. (2008). How students and instructors using a virtual learning environment perceive the fit between technology and task. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McGill, T., & Klobas, J. (2008). User developed application success: Sources and effects of involvement. Behaviour and Information Technology, 27(5), 407–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mills, A. M. (2006). Understanding involvement in technology adoption. In S. Spencer & A. Jenkins (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th australasian conference on information systems. Australia: Australasian Association for Information Systems Adelaide.Google Scholar
  36. Papastergiou, M. (2006). Course management systems as tools for the creation of online learning environments: Evaluation from a social constructivist perspective and implications for their design. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(4), 593–622.Google Scholar
  37. Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3), 236–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reeves, T. C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2005). Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 96–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rivard, S., Poirier, G., Raymond, L., & Bergeron, F. (1997). Development of a measure to assess the quality of user-developed applications. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 28(3), 44–58.Google Scholar
  41. Roca, J. C., Chiu, C.-M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rudestam, K. E., & Schoenholtz-Read, J. (2002). The coming of age of adult education. In K. E. Rudestam & J. Schoenholtz-Read (Eds.), Handbook of online learning: Innovations in higher education and corporate training (pp. 3–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Sclater, N. (2008). Web 2.0, personal learning environments, and the future of learning management systems, EDUCAUSE Research Bulletin (13). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.Google Scholar
  44. Seddon, P., & Kiew, M.-Y. (1996). A partial test and development of DeLone and McLean’s model of IS success. Australian Journal of Information Systems, 4(1), 90–109.Google Scholar
  45. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Staples, D. S., & Seddon, P. (2004). Testing the technology-to-performance chain model. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 16(4), 17–36.Google Scholar
  47. Sun, P., Tsai, R., Finger, G., Chen, Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1284–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1994). Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: Testing a conceptual model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(1), 167–187.Google Scholar
  51. van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. L. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education, 50(3), 838–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., Maruping, L. M., & Baia, H. (2008). Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: The competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 483–502.Google Scholar
  53. Wan, Z., Wang, Y., & Haggerty, N. (2008). Why people benefit from e-learning differently: The effects of psychological processes on e-learning outcomes. Information and Management, 45(8), 513–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang, Y.-S., Wang, H.-Y., & Shee, D. Y. (2007). Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: Scale development and validation. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1792–1808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wood, R. E., & Locke, E. A. (1987). The relation of self-efficacy and grade goals to academic performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47(4), 1013–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.M261 UWA Business SchoolThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  2. 2.Carlo F. Dondena Centre for Research on Social DynamicsUniversità BocconiMilanItaly
  3. 3.School of Information TechnologyMurdoch UniversityMurdochAustralia

Personalised recommendations