Advertisement

Journal of Computing in Higher Education

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 69–80 | Cite as

Mobile math: math educators and students engage in mobile learning

  • Teresa Franklin
  • Li-Wei Peng
Article

Abstract

The public and educational communities are aware of the continuing crisis in math education in our middle schools and the convergence of technologies for teaching and learning. This paper presents a case study in which iPod Touch® was used to help middle school students learn about algebraic equations and, in particular, the concept of slope, absolute value, and elimination. The development of math movies for use on the iPod Touch provided students with a mobile means of informal math learning beyond the hours of the classroom. While the study explored the use of mobile devices in an eighth grade math classroom, the lessons learned are invaluable to those seeking to implement mobile technologies to support teaching and learning with typical software, such as iMovie, PowerPoint, and iTunes ® .

Keywords

iPods iPod touch Math education Video development Teacher education Higher education K-12 education Math curriculum Podcasting 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I wish to acknowledge the work of MATRIX in providing the iPods used in this study. The contents of this article were developed under a cooperative agreement from the U.S. Department of Education. However, they do not necessarily represent the policy of the Department of Education nor an endorsement by the Federal Government. PR/Award Number U295A050004 through the U.S. Department of Education.

References

  1. Bereister, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Borja, R. R. (2005). Podcasting craze comes to K-12 schools. Education Week, 25(14), 8.Google Scholar
  3. Cummings, L. L., & Bromiley, P. (1996). The organizational trust inventory (OYI): Development and validation. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 300–320). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Dede, C. (2000). Emerging influences of information technology on school curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2, 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. i.P.O.C. (2006). iPods on campus. BizEd, 46, January–FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  6. Klopfer, E., Yoon, S., & Rivas, L. (2004). Comparative analysis of Palm and wearable computers for participatory simulations. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Miller, D. C., & Salkind, N. J. (2002). Handbook of research design and social measurement (6th ed., Chapter 4.8, pp. 162–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Ohio Department of Education. (2008). Interactive report card home. Retrieved June 12, 2008, from http://ilrc.ode.state.oh.us.
  9. Prensky, M. (2005). Listen to the natives. The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development: Educational Leadership, Dec 2005–Jan 2006, 9–13.Google Scholar
  10. Read, B. (2005). Lectures on the go. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(10), A39–A42.Google Scholar
  11. Saylor, K. (2004). Enjoying math through interactive approaches. Media and Methods, 40, 4–5.Google Scholar
  12. Van t’Hooft, M., Brown-Martin, G., & Swan, K. (2008). Anywhere, anytime learning using highly mobile devices. In L. Tomei (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information technology curriculum integration (pp. 37–38). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Warlick, D. (2006). Technology update. Curriculum Review, 46(2), 4–5.Google Scholar
  14. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instructional Technology, College of EducationOhio UniversityAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations