Advertisement

Journal of Computing in Higher Education

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 48–58 | Cite as

Educate at Penn State: preparing beginning teachers with powerful digital tools

  • Orrin T. Murray
  • Carla Zembal-Saul
Article

Abstract

University based teacher education programs are slowly beginning to catch up to other professional programs that use modern digital tools to prepare students to enter professional fields. This discussion looks at how one teacher education program reached the conclusion that students and faculty would use notebook computers. Frequently referred to as one-to-one initiatives, there is ample evidence that Penn State College of Education’s program is not another false summit in the pursuit to have technology transform teaching and learning.

Keywords

Teacher education Notebook computers One-to-one computing Educational technology 

References

  1. Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social ordering of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 78–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, H. J. (1983). School uses of microcomputers: Report #1 from a national survey. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 3(2), 29–33.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, H. J. (1985). How schools use microcomputers: Summary of the first national survey. Baltimore, MD: Center for Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  6. Jackson, P. W. (1990). Life in classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  7. Means, B. (Ed.). (1994). Technology and education reform: The reality behind the promise. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Murray, O. T. (2006). Investigating support for emerging structures: The role of instructional technology in an urban school district’s reform effort. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  9. National Commission on Educational Excellence. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  10. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  11. National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  12. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 29(1), 2–15.Google Scholar
  13. Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of schools. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  14. Tyack, D. B., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering towards utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EducationPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations