Advertisement

Marine Biodiversity

, Volume 49, Issue 6, pp 2587–2599 | Cite as

Diversity of bone-eating Osedax worms on the deep Atlantic whale falls—bathymetric variation and inter-basin distributions

  • Mauricio ShimabukuroEmail author
  • Paulo Y. G. Sumida
Original Paper
  • 158 Downloads

Abstract

Bone-eating Osedax worms can quickly colonize exposed bones and are important ecosystem engineers in whale fall communities, contributing to cause of bone degradation. This study shows that the deep SW Atlantic margin harbors many Osedax species. Using DNA barcoding, we found four putative new lineages as well as O. frankpressi Rouse, Goffredi, and Vrijenhoek, 2004 and O. braziliensis Fujiwara, Jimi, Sumida, Kawato, & Kitazato, 2019, with assemblages varying with depth. It is probable that the bathymetric distributions of these species are controlled by different water masses and their directions of flow. The haplotype network of Atlantic and Pacific O. frankpressi populations suggests segregation between populations, as is also seen in the high FST. However, the low p distance between both populations and the few substitution sites separating haplogroups from both regions (Atlantic and Pacific) could be evidence that populations of both basins are somehow close to each other. It is likely that whale fall habitats exist between both populations analyzed, connecting both basins.

Keywords

COI DNA barcoding Deep sea Inter-basin distribution Genetic population 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Masters and crews of R/V Alpha Crucis and R/V Alpha Delphini from IOUSP during the deployment and the recovering of SP-1500 lander. We are also indebted to the Brazilian Navy and the Master and crew of PRV Almirante Maximiano for the help during the recovering of the other landers. We also thank the editor, Dr. Craig R. Smith, and the two anonymous reviewers for the comments on the manuscript. MS was supported by CAPES/Proex PhD scholarship.

Funding

This study was funded by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) into the Research Program on Biodiversity Characterization, Conservation, Restoration and Sustainable Use (BIOTA Program)—grant number 2011/50185-1.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed by the authors.

Sampling and field studies

All necessary permits for sampling have been obtained by the authors from the competent authorities.

Data availability statement

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. All new COI sequences of Osedax were deposited in GenBank and the accession numbers are detailed in Table 2.

Supplementary material

12526_2019_988_MOESM1_ESM.png (583 kb)
Supplementary Figure S1 (PNG 582 kb)
12526_2019_988_MOESM2_ESM.png (13.2 mb)
Supplementary Figure S2 (PNG 13551 kb)
12526_2019_988_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (53 kb)
Supplementary Table S1 (XLSX 53 kb)

References

  1. Alfaro-Lucas JM, Shimabukuro M, Ferreira GD, Kitazato H, Fujiwara Y, Sumida PY (2017) Bone-eating Osedax worms (Annelida: Siboglinidae) regulate biodiversity of deep-sea whale-fall communities. Deep-Sea Res II 146:4–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2017.04.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amon DJ, Wiklund H, Dahlgren TG, Copley JT, Smith CR, Jamieson AJ, Glover AG (2014) Molecular taxonomy of Osedax (Annelida: Siboglinidae) in the Southern Ocean. Zool Scr 43(4):405–417.  https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Audzijonyte A, Vrijenhoek RC (2010) When gaps really are gaps: statistical phylogeography of hydrothermal vent invertebrates. Evolution 64(8):2369–2384.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00987.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Braby CE, Rouse GW, Johnson SB, Jones WJ, Vrijenhoek RC (2007) Bathymetric and temporal variation among Osedax boneworms and associated megafauna on whale-falls in Monterey Bay, California. Deep Sea Res I 54:1773–1791.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2007.05.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Breaker LC, Broenkow WW (1994) The circulation of Monterey Bay and related processes. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 32:1–64 ISSN: 0078-3218Google Scholar
  6. Campos EJD, Miller JL, Müller TJ, Peterson RG (1995) Physical oceanography of the Southwest Atlantic Ocean. Oceanography 8(3):87–91.  https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.1995.03 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clement MP, Posada D, Crandall K (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Madron XD, Weatherly G (1994) Circulation, transport and bottom boundary layers of the deep currents in Brazil Basin. J Mar Res 52:583–638.  https://doi.org/10.1357/0022240943076975 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Excoffier L, Lischer HE (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10(3):564–567.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fu YX (1997) Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics 147:915–925PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Fujikura K, Fujiwara Y, Kawato M (2006) A new species of Osedax (Annelida: Siboglinidae) associated with whale carcasses off Kyushu, Japan. Zool Sci 23(8):733–740.  https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.23.733 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fujiwara Y, Jimi N, Sumida PYG, Kawato M, Kitazato H (2019) New species of bone-eating worm Osedax from the abyssal South Atlantic Ocean (Annelida, Siboglinidae). ZooKeys 814:53–69.  https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.814.28869 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glover AG, Källström B, Smith CR, Dahlgren TG (2005) World-wide whale worms? A new species of Osedax from the shallow north Atlantic. Proc R Soc 272:2587–2592.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glover AG, Wiklund H, Taboada S, Avila C, Cristobo J, Smith CR, Kemp KM, Jamieson AJ, Dahlgren TG (2013) Bone-eating worms from the Antarctic: the contrasting fate of whale and wood remains on the Southern Ocean seafloor. Proc R Soc B 280:20131390.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.1390 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Goffredi SK, Orphan VJ, Rouse GW, Jahnke L, Embaye T, Turk K, Lee R, Vrijenhoek RC (2005) Evolutionary innovation: a bone-eating marine symbiosis. Environ Microbiol 7:1369–1378.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00824.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Goffredi SK, Johnson SB, Vrijenhoek RC (2007) Genetic diversity and potential function of microbial symbionts associated with newly discovered species of Osedax polychaete worms. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:2314–2323.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01986-06 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Higgs ND, Little CTS, Glover AG (2011) Bones as biofuel: a review of whale bone composition with implications for deep-sea biology and paleoanthropology. Proc R Soc B 278(1702):9–17.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1267 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hogg NG, Owens B (1999) Direct measurement of the deep circulation within the Brazil Basin. Deep-Sea Res II 46:335–353.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(98)00097-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones WJ, Johnson SB, Rouse GW, Vrijenhoek RC (2008) Marine worms (genus Osedax) colonize cow bones. Proc R Soc B 275:387–391.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1437 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30(4):772–780.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33(7):1870–1874.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lanfear R, Frandsen PB, Wright AM, Senfeld T, Calcott B (2016) PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol Biol Evol 34(3):772–773.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leigh JW, Bryant D (2015) Popart: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol Evol 6(9):1110–1116.  https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12410 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li Y, Kocot KM, Schander C, Santos SR, Thornhill DJ, Halanych KM (2015) Mitogenomics reveals phylogeny and repeated motifs in control regions of the deep-sea family Siboglinidae (Annelida). Mol Phylogenet Evol 85:221–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.02.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25:1451–1452.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lösekann T, Robador A, Niemann H, Knittel K, Boetius A, Dubilier N (2008) Endosymbioses between bacteria and deep-sea siboglinid tubeworms from an Arctic Cold Seep (Haakon Mosby Mud Volcano, Barents Sea). Environmental Microbiology 10 (12):3237–3254  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01712.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lundsten L, Schlining KL, Frasier K, Johnson SB, Kuhnz LA, Harvey JBJ, Clague G, Vrijenhoek RC (2010) Times-series analysis of six whale-fall communities in Monterey canyon, California, USA. Deep Sea Res I 57:1573–1584.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2010.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCartney MS (1993) Crossing of the equator by the deep west boundary current in the western Atlantic Ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 23:1953–1974.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1993)023<1953:COTEBT>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McMullin ER, Hourdez S, Schaeffer, SW and Fisher CR (2003) Phylogeny and biogeography of deep sea vestimentiferan tubeworms and their bacterial symbionts. Symbiosis 34, 1–41.Google Scholar
  30. Miyamoto N, Yamamoto T, Yusa Y, Fujiwara Y (2013) Postembryonic development of the bone-eating worm Osedax japonicus. Naturwissenschaften 100:285–289.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-013-1024-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Müller TJ, Ikeda Y, Zangenberg N, Nonato LV (1998) Direct measurements of western boundary currents off Brazil between 20°S and 28°S. J Geophys Res 103(C3):5429–5437.  https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC03529 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes v. 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 61:539–542.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Rouse GW, Goffredi SK, Vrijenhoek RC (2004) Osedax: bone-eating marine worms with dwarf males. Science 30:668–671.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1098650 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rouse GW, Worsaae K, Johnson SB, Jones WJ, Vrijenhoek RC (2008) Acquisition of dwarf male “harems” by recently settled females of Osedax roseus n. sp. (Siboglinida; Annelida). Biol Bull 214:67–82.  https://doi.org/10.2307/25066661 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rouse GW, Wilson NG, Goffredi SK, Johnson SB, Smart T, Widmer C, Young CM, Vrijenhoek RC (2009) Spawning and development in Osedax boneworms (Siboglinidae, Annelida). Mar Biol 156:395–405.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-008-1091-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rouse GW, Wilson NG, Worsaae K, Vrijenhoek RC (2015) A dwarf male reversal in bone-eating worms. Curr Biol 25:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rouse GW, Goffredi SK, Johnson SB, Vrijenhoek RC (2018) An inordinate fondness for Osedax (Siboglinidae: Annelida): fourteen new species of bone worms from California. Zootaxa 4377(4):451–489.  https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4377.4.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Saeedi H, Bernardino AF, Shimabukuro M, Falchetto G, Sumida PYG (2019) Macrofaunal community structure and biodiversity patterns based on a wood-fall experiment in the deep South-west Atlantic. Deep Sea Res I 145:73–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2019.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Salathé RM, Vrijenhoek RC (2012) Temporal variation and lack of host specificity among bacterial endosymbionts of Osedax bone worms (Polychaeta: Siboglinidae). BMC Evol Biol 12:189.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471.2148.12.189
  40. Santos MCO, Siciliano S, Vicente AFC, Alvarenga FS, Zampirolli E, Souza SP, Maranho A (2010) Cetacean records along São Paulo state coast southeastern Brazil. Braz J Oceanogr 58(2):123–142.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-87592010000200004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Silveira ICA, Schmidt ACK, Campos EJD, Godoi SS, Ikeda Y (2000) A corrente do Brazil ao largo da costa leste Brasileira. Rev Bras Oceanogr 48(2):171–183.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-77392000000200008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith CR, Baco AR (2003) Ecology of whale falls at the deep-sea floor. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 41:311–354 ISSN: 0078-3218Google Scholar
  43. Smith CR, Glover AG, Treude T, Higgs ND, Amon DJ (2015) Whale-fall ecosystems: recent insights into ecology, paleoecology, and evolution. Annu Rev Mar Sci 7:10.1–10.6.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010213-135144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Srivathsan A, Meier R (2012) On the inappropriate use of Kimura-2-parameter (K2P) divergences in the DNA-barcoding literature. Cladistics 28(2):190–194.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00370.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stamatakis A (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30(9):1312–1313.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Stramma L, England M (1999) On the water masses and mean circulation of the South Atlantic Ocean. J Geophys Res 104(C9):20,863–20,883.  https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC900139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sumida PYG, Alfaro-Lucas JM, Shimabukuro M, Kitazato H, Perez JAA, Soares-Gomes A, Toyofuku T, Lima AOS, Ara K, Fujiwara Y (2016) Deep-sea whale fall fauna from the Atlantic resembles that of the Pacific Ocean. Sci Rep 6:22139.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22139 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Taboada S, Riego A, Bas M, Arnedo MA, Cristobo J, Rouse GW, Avila C (2015) Bone-eating worms spread: insights into shallow-water Osedax (Annelida, Siboglinidae) from Antarctic, Subantarctic, and Mediterranean waters. PLoS One 10(11):e0140341.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140341 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Tajima F (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123(3):585–595 ISSN: 0016-6731PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Treude T, Smith CR, Wenzhöfer F, Carney E, Bernardino AF, Hannides AK, Krüger M, Boetius A (2009) Biogeochemistry of a deep-sea whale fall: sulfate reduction, sulfide efflux and methanogenesis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 382:1–21.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07972 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vrijenhoek RC, Johnson SB, Rouse GW (2008) Bone-eating Osedax females and their “harems” of dwarf males are recruited from a common larval pool. Mol Ecol 17:4535–4544.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03937.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Vrijenhoek RC, Johnson SB, Rouse GW (2009) A remarkable diversity of bone-eating worms (Osedax; Siboglinidae; Annelida). BMC Biol 7(1):74.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-7-74 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Wedekin LL, Rossi-Santos MR, Baracho C, Cypriano-Souza AL, Simões-Lopes PC (2014) Cetacean records along a coastal-offshore gradient in the Vitória-Trindade Chain, western South Atlantic Ocean. Braz JBiol 74(1):137–144.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.21812 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Worsaae K, Rouse GW (2010) The simplicity of males: dwarf males of four species of Osedax (Siboglinidae: Annelida) investigated by confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Morphol 271:127–142.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10786 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Xia X (2017) DAMBE6: new tools for microbial genomics, phylogenetics, and molecular evolution. J Hered 108(4):431–437.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esx033 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Zerbini AN, Secchi ER, Siciliano S, Simões-Lopes PC (1997) A review of the occurrence and distribution of whales of the genus Balaenoptera along the Brazilian coast. Report International Whaling Commission 47:407–417 Available at: https://archive.iwc.int/pages/search.php?search=!collection33&bc_from=themes. Accessed 14 Aug 2017
  57. Zerbini AN, Andriolo A, Heide-Jørgensen MP, Pizzorno JL, Maia YG, VanBlaricom GR, DeMaster DP, Simões-Lopes P, Moreira S, Bethlem C (2006) Satellite-monitored movements of humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae in the Southwest Atlantic Ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 313:295–304.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps313295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto OceanográficoUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations