Advertisement

Pycnophyidae (Kinorhyncha: Allomalorhagida) from the Gulf of Mexico: Fujuriphyes viserioni sp. nov. and a redescription of Leiocanthus langi (Higgins, 1964), with notes on its intraspecific variation

  • Nuria SánchezEmail author
  • Martin V. Sørensen
  • Stephen C. Landers
Original Paper
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Fujuriphyes viserioni sp. nov. is described from the Gulf of Mexico. The new species is characterized by the scarcity of laterodorsal setae, and the abundance of ventrolateral setae, which are present on segments 1, 3–8, and 10, with two pairs on segment 5 and one pair on the remaining segments. Moreover, Fujuriphyes viserioni sp. nov. is recognized by the general absence of middorsal specializations along the trunk and the lack of ventral tubes on segment 2 in males. Type material of Leiocanthus langi (Higgins, 1964) and L. fimbriatus (Higgins, 1982) and additional specimens of L. langi collected from the Gulf of Mexico were furthermore studied in detail. Their examination revealed that L. fimbriatus is a junior synonym of L. langi, a species with an unusually high intraspecific variation in its morphology. Identification keys to all known species of Fujuriphyes and Leiocanthus are provided together with emended diagnoses for both genera.

Keywords

Atlantic Identification key Meiofauna Morphology Pycnophyidae Taxonomy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the staff and students of Troy University (TU) for help with sediment collection and laboratory work. In addition, our thanks go to the researchers at the NMFS/NOAA Pascagoula lab and to Clint Edds at the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries lab at Grand Isle for their help with sediment collection, to Phillip Randsø (NHMD) for his help with sediment collection in Louisiana, to Dr. Steve Ramroop and Randall Bassham (TU) for providing Fig. 1, and to Dr. Jon Norenburg and the staff at MSC, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, for loaning us specimens of Leiocanthus.

Funding

This study was funded by the Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative (funding source: Year 3–5 Investigator Grants, RFP-II). Additional funding was provided by the ALFA insurance company and Troy University.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed by the authors.

Sampling and field studies

All necessary permits for sampling and observational field studies have been obtained by the authors from the competent authorities and are mentioned in the acknowledgements, if applicable.

Data availability

Data are publicly available through the Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative Information and Data Cooperative (GRIIDC) at https://data.gulfresearchinitiative.org (doi:  https://doi.org/10.7266/N74J0C32 and  https://doi.org/10.7266/N7W66HTS).

References

  1. Adrianov AV, Malakhov VV (1999) Cephalorhyncha of the world ocean. KMK Scientific Press, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  2. Blake CH (1930) Three new species of worms belonging to the order Echinodera. Biol Survey Mount Desert Region 4:3–10Google Scholar
  3. Bouyoucos GJ (1962) Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soils. Agron J 54:464–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown R, Higgins RP (1983) A new species of Kinorhynchus (Homalorhagida, Pycnophyidae) from Australia with a redescription and range extension of other Kinorhyncha from the South Pacific. Zool Scr 12:161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burgess R (2001) An improved protocol for separating meiofauna from sediments using colloidal silica sols. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 214:161–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chitwood BG (1951) Echinoderella steineri new species (Scolecida, Echinodera). Tex J Sci 3:113–114Google Scholar
  7. Harper DE Jr, Potts DL, Salzer RR, Case RJ, Jaschek RL, Walker CM (1981) Distribution and abundance of macrobenthic and meiobenthic organisms. In: Middleditch BS (ed) Environmental effects of offshore oil production. Mar Sci 14. Plenum Press, New York, pp 133–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Higgins RP (1964) Three new kinorhynchs from the North Carolina coast. Bull Mar Sci Gulf Caribb 14:479–493Google Scholar
  9. Higgins RP (1965) The homalorhagid Kinorhyncha of northeastern U.S. coastal waters. Trans Am Microsc Soc 84:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Higgins RP (1974) Chapter 11: Kinorhyncha. In: Giese AC, Pearce JS (eds) Vol. I Acoelomate and pseudocoelomate metazoans. Academic Press, New York, pp 507–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Higgins RP (1977) Two new species of Echinoderes (Kinorhyncha) from South Carolina. Trans Am Microsc Soc 96:340–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Higgins RP (1978) Echinoderes gerardi n. sp. and E. riedli (Kinorhyncha) from the Gulf of Tunis. Trans Am Microsc Soc 97:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Higgins RP (1982) Three new species of Kinorhyncha from Bermuda. Trans Am Microsc Soc 101:305–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Higgins RP (1983) The Atlantic Barrier reef ecosystem at Carrie Bow Cay, Belize, II: Kinorhyncha. Smithson Contrib Mar Sci (18):1–131Google Scholar
  15. Higgins RP (1986a) Kinorhyncha. In: Botosaneanu L (ed) Stygofauna mundi. A faunistic, distributional, and ecological synthesis of the world fauna inhabiting subterranean waters (including the marine interstitial). EJ Brill, Dr. W Backhuys, Leiden, pp 110–118Google Scholar
  16. Higgins RP (1986b) Phylum Kinorhyncha. In: Sterrer W, Schopfer-Sterrer C (eds) Marine fauna and flora of Bermuda: a systematic guide to the identification of marine organisms. Wiley, Sons, New York, pp 220–222Google Scholar
  17. Higgins RP (1988) Kinorhyncha. In: Higgins RP, Thiel H (eds) Introduction to the study of meiofauna. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 328–331Google Scholar
  18. Higgins RP, Adrianov A (1991) Kinorhyncha from the Black Sea. I. Redescription of Kinorhynchus paraneapolitanus. Trans Am Microsc Soc 110:328–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Higgins RP, Fleeger JW (1980) Seasonal changes in the population structure of Echinoderes coulli (Kinorhyncha). Coast Mar Sci 10:495–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Landers SC, Sørensen MV (2016) Two new species of Echinoderes (Kinorhyncha: Cyclorhagida), E. romanoi sp. n. and E. joyceae sp. n, from the Gulf of Mexico. ZooKeys 594:51–71.  https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.594.8623 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Landers SC, Sørensen MV (2018) A new species of kinorhynch, Echinoderes sylviae n. sp. (Kinorhyncha, Cyclorhagida), from the Gulf of Mexico, with comparative notes on a similar species Echinoderes spinifurca. Bull Mar Sci 94:1499–1514.  https://doi.org/10.5343/bms.2017.1167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Landers SC, Sørensen MV, Beaton KR, Jones CM, Miller JM, Stewart PM (2018) Kinorhynch assemblages in the Gulf of Mexico continental shelf collected during a two-year survey. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 502:81–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2017.05.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Landers SC, Sørensen MV, Sánchez N, Beaton KR, Miller JM, Ingels J (2019) Kinorhynch communities on the Louisiana continental shelf. Proc Biol Soc Wash 132(1):15.  https://doi.org/10.2988/18-00008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lang K (1949) Echinoderida. In: Odhner NH (ed) Further zoological results of the Swedish Antarctic Expedition 1901–1903, Vol. IV, No. 2. Norstedt and Sönner, Stockholm, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  25. Neuhaus B (2013) Kinorhyncha (=Echinodera). In: Schmidt-Rhaesa A (ed) Handbook of Zoology. Gastrotricha, Cycloneuralia and Gnathifera. Volume 1: Nematomorpha, Priapulida, Kinorhyncha, Loricifera. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 181–348Google Scholar
  26. Neuhaus B, Sørensen MV (2013) Populations of Campyloderes sp. (Kinorhyncha, Cyclorhagida): one global species with significant morphological variation? Zool Anz 252:48–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2012.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neuhaus B, Pardos F, Sørensen MV, Higgins RP (2014) New species of Centroderes (Kinorhyncha: Cyclorhagida) from the Northwest Atlantic Ocean, life cycle, and ground pattern of the genus. Zootaxa 3901:1–69.  https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3901.1.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reinhard W (1881) Über Echinoderes und Desmoscolex der Umgegend von Odessa. Zool Anz 4(97):588–592Google Scholar
  29. Sánchez N, Yamasaki H (2016) Two new Pycnophyidae species (Kinorhyncha: Allomalorhagida) from Japan lacking ventral tubes in males. Zool Anz 265:80–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2016.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sánchez N, Pardos F, Herranz M, Benito J (2011) Pycnophyes dolichurus sp. nov. and P. aulacodes sp. nov. (Kinorhyncha, Homalorhagida, Pycnophyidae), two new kinorhynchs from Spain with a reevaluation of homalorhagid taxonomic characters. Helgol Mar Res 65:319–334.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10152-010-0226-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sánchez N, Rho SH, Min WG, Kim D, Sørensen MV (2013) Four new species of Pycnophyes (Kinorhyncha: Homalorhagida) from Korea and the East China Sea. Sci Mar 77:353–380.  https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.03769.15A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sánchez N, Herranz M, Benito J, Pardos F (2014) Pycnophyes almansae sp. nov. and Pycnophyes lageria sp. nov., two new homalorhagid kinorhynchs (Kinorhyncha, Homalorhagida) from the Iberian Peninsula, with special focus on introvert features. Mar Biol Res 10:17–36.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000.2013.793804 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sánchez N, Yamasaki H, Pardos F, Sørensen MV, Martínez A (2016) Morphology disentangles the systematics of a ubiquitous but elusive meiofaunal group (Kinorhyncha: Pycnophyidae). Cladistics 32:479–505.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sánchez N, García-Herrero Á, García-Gómez G, Pardos F (2018) A new species of the recently established genus Setaphyes (Kinorhyncha, Allomalorhagida) from the Mediterranean with an identification key. Mar Biodivers 48:249–258.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-017-0651-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sheremetevskij AM (1974) Kinorhyncha of the Black Sea. Zool Zhurnal 53:974–987Google Scholar
  36. Shirley TC (2009) Kinorhyncha of the Gulf of Mexico. In: Felder DL, Camp DK (eds) Gulf of Mexico, Origins, Waters, and Biota. Volume 1. Biodiversity Texas A & M University Press, College Station, pp 1129–1132Google Scholar
  37. Soil Survey Staff (1996) Soil survey laboratory methods manual. Ver. 3.0. USDA/NRCS, Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 42. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  38. Sørensen MV, Landers SC (2014) Two new species of Echinoderes (Kinorhyncha: Cyclorhagida) from the Gulf of Mexico. Front Mar Sci 1(article 8):1–18.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2014.00008 Google Scholar
  39. Sørensen MV, Landers SC (2017) Description of a new kinorhynch species, Paracentrophyes sanchezae n. sp. (Kinorhyncha: Allomalorhagida) from the Gulf of Mexico, with differential notes on one additional, yet undescribed species of the genus. Zootaxa 4242:61–76.  https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4242.1.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sørensen MV, Landers SC (2018) New species of Semnoderidae (Kinorhyncha: Cyclorhagida: Kentrorhagata) from the Gulf of Mexico. Mar Biodivers 48:327–355.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-017-0728-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sørensen MV, Pardos F (2008) Kinorhynch systematics and biology-an introduction to the study of kinorhynchs, inclusive identification keys to the genera. Meiofauna Marina 16:21–73Google Scholar
  42. Sørensen MV, Herranz M, Landers SC (2016a) A new species of Echinoderes (Kinorhyncha: Cyclorhagida) from the Gulf of Mexico, with a redescription of Echinoderes bookhouti Higgins, 1964. Zool Anz 265:48–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2016.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sørensen MV, Gąsiorowski L, Randsø PV, Sánchez N, Neves RC (2016b) First report of kinorhynchs from Singapore, with the description of three new species. Raffles Bull Zool 64:3–27Google Scholar
  44. Zelinka K (1928) Monographie der Echinodera. Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, LeipzigGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biodiversity, Ecology and EvolutionUniversidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.Institut Français de Recherche pour l’Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER), Centre Bretagne, REM/EEP/LEPPlouzanéFrance
  3. 3.Natural History Museum of DenmarkUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  4. 4.Department of Biological and Environmental SciencesTroy UniversityTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations