Advertisement

Tropical Eastern Pacific Amphoriscidae Dendy, 1892 (Porifera: Calcarea: Calcaronea: Leucosolenida) from the Peruvian coast

  • Báslavi Cóndor-Luján
  • Fernanda Azevedo
  • Eduardo Hajdu
  • Yuri Hooker
  • Philippe Willenz
  • Michelle KlautauEmail author
Original Paper
  • 105 Downloads

Abstract

Two new species of Amphoriscidae Dendy, 1892 (Porifera Grant, 1836: Calcarea Bowerbank, 1862: Leucosolenida Hartman, 1958) from the northern coast of Peru, Tropical Eastern Pacific, are described integrating molecules and morphology. Leucilla mancoraensis sp. nov. is a tube-shaped sponge with apical osculum, sylleibid aquiferous system, and a skeleton composed of cortical triactines and giant tetractines, thick subatrial triactines, and atrial tetractines with short apical actines. Paraleucilla tarazonai sp. nov. is the first record of Paraleucilla Dendy, 1892 for the Eastern Pacific and presents a skeleton formed of cortical microdiactines, diactines, triactines, and tetractines, subatrial triactines, and atrial triactines and tetractines. These two species are provisionally endemic to the northern coast of Peru (Guayaquil ecoregion). Our phylogenetic analysis, which included the largest number of Amphoriscidae species, was congruent with previous studies. The family Amphoriscidae including an Amphoriscus Haeckel, 1870 species as well as the genera Leucilla Haeckel, 1872 and Paraleucilla were recovered as non-monophyletic groups. Despite being polyphyletic, information on species distribution of this family is relevant for diversity studies; consequently, we present the geographic distribution of each genus of Amphoriscidae.

Keywords

Amphoriscus Leucilla Paraleucilla C-region of LSU Tropical East Pacific province Guayaquil ecoregion 

Abbreviations

GW

Gert Wörheide

IRB

Institut Ruđer Bošković, Zagreb, Croatia

MNRJ

Museu Nacional of Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

PMR

Prirodoslovni Muzej Rijeka, Croatia

QM

Queensland Museum, Australia

RMNH

Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Histoire Leiden, Netherlands

SAM

South Australian Museum, Australia

UFRJPOR

Porifera collection of the Biology Institute of Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

WAMZ

Zoological collection of the Western Australian Museum, Perth, Australia

ZMA.POR

Zoölogisch Museum, Instituut voor Systematiek en Populatiebiologie, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the field staff (F. Menendez and M. Rios) for assistance in collecting samples. We also thank Gisele Lôbo-Hajdu (UERJ), students, and biologists from both Peru and Brazil (B. Ibañez, F. Menendez, M. Rios, C. Segami, and W. Vieira) for assistance in collecting samples on different expeditions.

Funding information

ESPER Project granted to RBINS was funded by the Global Taxonomy Initiative from the Belgian Development Cooperation (ESPER Project, 2419JVG2, 2431JVG2, and 2433FRK2); Proyecto EsponjAS was funded by the National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq/PROSUL –490425/2007-0; CNPq/Universal 476558/2012-3; CNPq/Universal 476597/2013-7) and by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES/Protax – 561782/2010-5). The collection of samples was performed thanks to RBINS diving gear. BCL and FA received scholarships from CAPES. PhW was supported by travel grant #18834 from the FNRS (Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique) to conduct part of this study at MNRJ and UFRJ. YH obtained travel funds from the GTIBDC. MK received a fellowship from CNPq (302459/2014-6) and CAPES (440628/2015-6).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed by the authors.

Sampling and field studies

All necessary permits for sampling and observational field studies have been obtained by the authors from the competent authorities.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available in the GenBank repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/

References

  1. Aguilar-Camacho JM, Carballo JL, Cruz-Barraza JA (2014) Acarnidae Porifera: Demospongiae: Poecilosclerida) from the Mexican Pacific Ocean with the description of six new species. Sci Mar 77(4):677–696Google Scholar
  2. Aguirre LK, Hooker Y, Willenz P, Hajdu E (2011) A new Clathria (Demospongiae, Microcionidae) from Peru occurring on rocky substrates as well as epibiontic on Eucidaris thouarsii sea urchins. Zootaxa 3085:41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Austin WC (1996) Sponges from Rocas Alijos. In: Schmieder RW (ed) Monographiae Biologicae. Rocas Alijos. Scientific Results from the Cordell Expeditions. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, pp 237–256Google Scholar
  4. Austin WC, Ott BS, McDaniel NG, Reiswig HM, Romagosa P (2012) Sponges of the cold temperate NE Pacific. http://mareco.org/KML/Projects/NESponges.asp. Accessed 18 November 2017
  5. Alvizu A, Eilertsen MH, Xavier JR, Rapp H (2018) Increased taxon sampling provides new insights into the phylogeny and evolution of the subclass Calcaronea (Porifera, Calcarea). Org Divers Evol (2018) 18: 279–290Google Scholar
  6. Azevedo F, Cóndor-Luján B, Willenz P, Hajdu E, Hooker Y, Klautau M (2015) Integrative taxonomy of calcareous sponges (subclass Calcinea) from the Peruvian coast: morphology, molecules, and biogeography. Zool J Linnean Soc 173:787–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Azevedo F, Hajdu E, Willenz P, Klautau M (2009) New records of calcareous sponges (Porifera, Calcarea) from the Chilean coast. Zootaxa 2072:1–30Google Scholar
  8. Azevedo F, Klautau M (2007) Calcareous sponges (Porifera, Calcarea) from Ilha Grande Bay, Brazil, with description of three new species. Zootaxa 1402(1):1–22Google Scholar
  9. Bidder GP (1898) The skeleton and the classification of calcareous sponges. Proc R Soc Lond 64:61–76Google Scholar
  10. Borojević R (1967) Spongiaires d’Afrique du Sud. (2) Calcarea. Trans R Soc S Afr 37(3):183–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borojević R, Boury-Esnault N (1986) Description d'une éponge calcaire calcaronéenne du genre Leucilla Haeckel en Méditerranée: Leucilla endoumensis n. sp. Bull Mus Hist Nat Paris 8A(1):3–7Google Scholar
  12. Borojević R, Boury-Esnault N, Manuel M, Vacelet J (2002) Order Leucosolenida Hartman, 1958. In: Hooper JNA, Van Soest RWM (eds) Systema Porifera: a guide to the classification of sponges. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp 1157–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bowerbank JS (1862) On the anatomy and physiology of the Spongiadae. Part II Philos Trans R Soc Lond 152(2):747–829Google Scholar
  14. Breitfuss LL (1898) Die Kalkschwämme der Sammlung Plate. Zool Jahrb Suppl Band 4:455–470Google Scholar
  15. Carballo JL, Bautista-Guerrero E, Cruz-Barraza JA (2018) Description and molecular phylogeny of Axinella nayaritensis n. sp. (Porifera: Axinellida) from East Pacific and remarks about the polyphyly of the genus Axinella. Zootaxa 4482(1):111–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cavalcanti F, Menegola C, Lanna E (2014) Three new species of the genus Paraleucilla Dendy, 1892 (Porifera, Calcarea) from the coast of Bahia state, northeastern Brazil. Zootaxa 3764(5):537–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chombard C, Boury-Esnault N, Tillier S (1998) Reassessment of homology of morphological characters in tetractinellid sponges based on molecular data. Syst Biol 47(3):351–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cóndor-Luján B, Louzada T, Hajdu E, Klautau M (2018) Morphological and molecular taxonomy of calcareous sponges (Porifera: Calcarea) from Curacao, Caribbean Sea. Zool J Linnean Soc 183(3):459–525Google Scholar
  19. Dendy A (1892) Synopsis of the Australian Calcarea Heterocoela; with a proposed classification of the group and descriptions of some new genera and species. Proc R Soc Vic 5:69–116Google Scholar
  20. Dendy A (1913) Report on the calcareous sponges collected by H. M. S. ‘Sealark’ in the Indian Ocean. Trans Linn Soc Lond 16:1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dendy A, Row H (1913) The classification and phylogeny of the calcareous sponges, with a reference list of all the described species, systematically arranged. Proc Zool Soc Lond 47:704–813Google Scholar
  22. de Laubenfels MW (1930) The sponges of California. (Abstracts of dissertations for the degree of doctor of philosophy). Stanford University Bulletin 5(98):24–29Google Scholar
  23. de Laubenfels MW (1932) The marine and fresh-water sponges of California. Proc USNM 81(2927):1–140Google Scholar
  24. Dailianis D, Akyol O, Babali N, Bariche M, Crocetta F, Gerovasileiou V, Ghanem R, Gökoğlu M, Hasiotis T, Izquierdo-Muñoz A, Julian D, Katsanevakis S, Lipej L, Mancini E, Mytilineou C, Ounifi Ben Amor K, Özgül A, Ragkousis M, Rubio-Portillo E, Servello G, Sini M, Stamouli C, Sterioti A, Teker S, Tiralongo F, Trkov D (2016) New Mediterranean biodiversity records (July 2016). Mediterr Mar Sci 17(2):608–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Desqueyroux-Faúndez R, Van Soest RWM (1996) A review of Iophonidae, Myxillidae and Tedaniidae occurring in the South East Pacific (Porifera: Poecilosclerida). Rev Suisse Zool 103(1):3–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Díaz MC, Van Soest RWM, Rützler K, Guzman HM (2005) Aplysina chiriquiensis, a new pedunculate sponge from the Gulf of Chiriqui, Eastern Pacific (Aplysinidae, Verongida). Zootaxa 1012:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Duplessis K, Reiswig HM (2000) Description of a new deep-water calcareous sponge (Porifera: Calcarea) from Northern California. Pac Sci 54(1):10–14Google Scholar
  28. Fernandez JCC, Cárdenas CA, Bravo A, Lôbo-Hajdu G, Willenz P, Hajdu E (2016) Lissodendoryx (Ectyodoryx) Lundbeck, 1909 (Coelosphaeridae, Poecilosclerida, Demospongiae) from Southern Chile: new species and a discussion of morphologic characters in the subgenus. Zootaxa 4092(1):69–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gerovasileiou V, Akel EHK, Akyol O, Alongi G, Azevedo F, Babali N, Bakiu R, Bariche M, Bennoui A, Castriota L, Chintiroglou CC, Crocetta F, Deidun A, Galinou-Mitsoudi S, Giovos L, Gökoğlu M, Golemaj A, Hadjioannou HJ, Insacco G, Katsanevakis S, Kleitou P, Korun J, Lipej L, Malegue M, Michailidis N, Mouzai Tiforua A, Ovalis P, Petović S, Piraino S, Rizkalla SI, Rousou M, Savva I, Sen H, Spinelli A, Vougioukalou KG, Xharahi E, Zava B, Zenetos A (2017) New Mediterranean biodiversity records (July 2017). Mediterr Mar Sci 18(2):355–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gómez P, González-Acosta B, Sánchez-Ortíz C, Hoffman Z, Hernández-Guerrero CJ (2018) Amended definitions for Aplysinidae and Aplysina (Porifera, Demospongiae, Vergongiida): on three new species from a remarkable population in the Gulf of California. Zootaxa 4455(2):322–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grant RE (1836). Animal kingdom. In: Todd RB (ed) The cyclopaedia of anatomy and physiology. Sherwood, Gilbert, and Piper, London, pp 107–118Google Scholar
  32. Haeckel E (1870) Prodromus eines Systems der Kalkschwämme. Jenaische Zeitschrift 5:176–119Google Scholar
  33. Haeckel E (1872) Die Kalkschwämme. Eine Monographie in zwei Bänden Text und einem Atlas mit 60 Tafeln Abbildungen. Verlag von Georg Reimer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  34. Hajdu E, Desqueyroux-Faúndez R, Carvalho MDS, Lôbo-Hajdu G, Willenz P (2013) Twelve new Demospongiae (Porifera) from Chilean fjords, with remarks upon sponge-derived biogeographic compartments in the SE Pacific. Zootaxa 3744(1):1–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hajdu E, Hooker Y, Willenz P (2015) New Hamacantha from Peru, and resurrection of Zygherpe as subgenus (Demospongiae, Poecilosclerida, Hamacanthidae). Zootaxa 3926(1):87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hartman W (1958) A re-examination of Bidder’s classification of the Calcarea. Syst Zool 7:97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hooper J, Van Soest RWM (2002) Systema Porifera: a guide to the classification of sponges. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hôzawa S (1940) Reports on the calcareous sponges obtained by the Zoological Institute and Museum of Hamburg. Sci Rep Tohoku Imp Univ 15:131–163Google Scholar
  39. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30(4):772–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Katoh K, Toh H (2008) Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Brief Bioinform 9(4):286–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Klautau M, Cavalcanti FF, Borojevic R (2017) The new sponge species Amphoriscus pedunculatus (Porifera, Calcarea). Zootaxa 4341(1):105–112Google Scholar
  43. Klautau M, Imešek M, Azevedo F, Pleše B, Nikolić V, Ćetković H (2016) Adriatic calcarean sponges (Porifera, Calcarea), with the description of six new species and a richness analysis. Eur J Taxon 178:1–52Google Scholar
  44. Klautau M, Monteiro L, Borojevic R (2004) First occurrence of the genus Paraleucilla (Calcarea, Porifera) in the Atlantic Ocean: P. magna sp. nov. Zootaxa 710:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Klautau M, Valentine C (2003) Revision of the genus Clathrina (Porifera, Calcarea). Zool J Linnean Soc 139:1–62Google Scholar
  46. Lambe LM (1893) Sponges from the Pacific coast of Canada. Proceed Trans R Soc Can 11(4):25–43Google Scholar
  47. Lanna E, Rattis L, Cavalcanti F (2017) The presence of the diagnostic character of the genus Paraleucilla (Amphoriscidae, Calcarea, Porifera) may depend on the volume and body wall thickness of the sponges. Invertebr Biol 136(3):321–329Google Scholar
  48. Lehnert H, Stone R (2017) Description of a new species of Trichogypsiidae (Porifera, Calcarea) and first record of the genus in the Pacific Ocean. Zootaxa 4312(2):394–400Google Scholar
  49. Longo C, Mastrototaro F, Corriero G (2007) Occurrence of Paraleucilla magna (Porifera: Calcarea) in the Mediterranean Sea. J Mar Biol Assoc U K 87:1749–1755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mačić V, Petović S (2017) New data on the distribution of the alien sponge Paraleucilla magna Klautau, Monteiro & Borojević, 2004 in the Adriatic Sea. Studia Marina 29(1):63–68Google Scholar
  51. Muricy G, Lopes DA, Hajdu E, Carvalho MS, Moraes FC, Klautau M, Menegola C, Pinheiro U (2011) Catalogue of Brazilian Porifera. Museu Nacional, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  52. Nei M, Kumar S (2000) Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Poléjaeff N (1883) Report on the Calcarea dredged by H.M.S.‘ Challenger’, during the years 1873-1876. Report on the scientific results of the voyage of H.M.S. ‘Challenger’, 1873-1876. Zoology 8(2):1–76Google Scholar
  54. von Preiwisch J (1904) Kalkschwämme aus dem Pacific. Ergebnisse einer Reise nach dem Pacific, Schauinsland 1896/97. Zool Jb Syt 19:9–26Google Scholar
  55. Ridley SO (1881) Spongida. Horny and siliceous sponges of Magellan Straits, S.W. Chili, and Atlantic off S.W. Brazil. Account of the zoological collections made during the survey of H.M.S. ‘Alert” in the straits of Magellan and on the coast of Patagonia. XI. Proc Zool Soc Lond 107–137, 140–141Google Scholar
  56. Ronquist F, Huelsenback JP (2003) MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Row RWH (1909) Reports on the marine biology of the Sudanese Red Sea. XIX. Report on the sponges collected by Mr Cyril Crossland in 1904–05. Zool J Linnean Soc 31:182–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Row RWH, Hôzawa S (1931) Report on the Calcarea obtained by the Hamburg South-West Australian Expedition of 1905. Sci Rep Tohoku Imp Univ 6:727–809Google Scholar
  59. Spalding MD, Fox HE, Allen GR, Davidson N, Ferdaña ZA, Finlayson M, Halpern BS, Jorge MA, Lombana A, Lourie SA, Martin KD, McManus E, Molnar J, Recchia CA, Robertson J (2007) Marine ecoregions of the world: a bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. Bioscience 57:573–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30(12):2725–2729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tanita S (1942) Report on the calcareous sponges obtained by the Zoological Institute and Museum of Hamburg. Part II. Sci Rep Tohoku Imp Univ (4) 17(2):105–135Google Scholar
  62. Thiele J (1905) Die Kiesel- und Hornschwämme der Sammlung Plate. Zool Jahrb Suppl 6 (Fauna Chilensis III): 407–496Google Scholar
  63. Topaloğlu B, Evcen A, Cinar ME (2016) Sponge fauna in the Sea of Marmara. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci 16(1):51–59Google Scholar
  64. Urban F (1902) Rhabdodermella nuttingi, nov. gen. et nov. spec. Z Wiss Zool 71:268–275Google Scholar
  65. Urban F (1906) Kalifornische Kalkschwämme. Arch Naturgesch 72(1):33–76Google Scholar
  66. Van Soest RWM, Boury-Esnault N, Hooper JNA, Rützler K, de Voogd NJ, Alvarez de Glasby B, Hajdu E, Pisera AB, Manconi R, Schoenberg C, Janussen D, Tabachnick KR, Klautau M, Picton B, Kelly M, Vacelet J, Dohrmann M, Díaz MC, Cárdenas P (2018) World Porifera database. In: World Porifera Database. http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera/. Accessed 09 September 2018
  67. Van Soest RWM, Boury-Esnault N, Vacelet J, Dohrmann M, Erpenbeck D, De Voogd N, Santodomingo N, Vanhoorne B, Kelly M, Hooper JNA (2012) Global diversity of sponges (Porifera). PLoS One 7(4):e35105Google Scholar
  68. Van Soest RWM, Hooper JNA, Hiemstra F (1991) Taxonomy, phylogeny and biogeography of the marine sponge genus Acarnus (Porifera: Poecilosclerida). Beaufortia 42(3):49–88Google Scholar
  69. Van Soest RWM, de Voogd NJ (2015) Calcareous sponges of Indonesia. Zootaxa 3951(1):1–105Google Scholar
  70. Voigt O, Wörheide G (2016) A short LSU rRNA fragment as a standard marker for integrative taxonomy in calcareous sponges (Porifera: Calcarea). Org Divers and Evol 16:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Voigt O, Wülfing E, Wörheide G (2012) Molecular phylogenetic evaluation of classification and scenarios of character evolution in calcareous sponges (Porifera, class Calcarea). PLoS One 7(3):e33417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. von Lendenfeld R (1910a) The sponges. 1. The Geodidae. In: Reports on the Scientific Results of the Expedition to the Eastern Tropical Pacific, in charge of Alexander Agassiz, by the U.S. Fish Commission Steamer ‘Albatross’, from October, 1904, to March, 1905, Lieut. Commander L.M. Garrett, U.S.N., Commanding, and of other Expeditions of the “Albatross”, 1888-1904. (21). Mem Mus Comp Zoology Harv Coll 41(1):1–259Google Scholar
  73. von Lendenfeld R (1910b) The sponges. 2. The Erylidae. In: Reports on the Scientific Results of the Expedition to the Eastern Tropical Pacific, in charge of Alexander Agassiz, by the U.S. Fish Commission Steamer ‘Albatross’, from October, 1904, to March, 1905, Lieut. Commander L.M. Garrett, U.S.N., Commanding, and of other Expeditions of the “Albatross”, 1888-1904. (21). Mem Mus Comp Zoology Harv Coll 41(2):261–324Google Scholar
  74. von Lendenfeld R (1915) The sponges. 3. Hexactinellida. In: Reports on the Scientific Results of the Expedition to the Eastern Tropical Pacific, in charge of Alexander Agassiz, by the U.S. Fish Commission Steamer ‘Albatross’, from October, 1904, to March, 1905, Lieut. Commander L.M. Garrett, U.S.N., Commanding, and of other Expeditions of the “Albatross”, 1891-1899 (29). Mem Mus Comp Zoology Harv Coll 42(2):1–396Google Scholar
  75. Willenz P, Hajdu E, Desqueyroux-Faúndez R, Lôbo-Hajdu G, Carvalho MS, Azevedo F, Klautau M (2009) Porifera. In: Häusserman V, Försterra G (eds) Fauna Marina Bentónica de la Patagonia Chilena, 1st edn. Nature in Focus, Santiago, pp 93–170Google Scholar
  76. Wilson HV (1904) Reports on an exploration off the West Coasts of Mexico, Central and South America, and off the Galapagos Islands, in charge of Alexander Agassiz, by the U.S. Fish Commission Steamer ‘Albatross” during 1891, Lieut. Commander Z.L. Tanner, U.S.S., commanding. XXX. The sponges. Mem Mus Comp Zool̈ogy Harv Coll 30(1):1–164Google Scholar
  77. Wörheide G, Hooper JNA (1999) Calcarea from the Great Barrier Reef. 1: cryptic Calcinea from Heron Island and Wistari Reef (Capricorn-Bunker Group). Queensland Mus Mem 43:859–891Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de ZoologiaRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Universidad Científica del Sur, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Biológicas, Carrera de Biología MarinaLimaPeru
  3. 3.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Museu Nacional, Departamento de InvertebradosRio de JaneiroBrazil
  4. 4.Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Facultad de Ciencias y Filosofia, Laboratorio de Biología MarinaLimaPeru
  5. 5.Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Taxonomy and PhylogenyBruxellesBelgium

Personalised recommendations