Biodiversity and ecology of meiofauna in extreme and changing environments
- 642 Downloads
Group photograph of on-site participants of the MeioScool2016 Summer School
List of papers presented in this Special Issue of Marine Biodiversity
| Reference | Topic | Taxon | Geographic area | Ecosystem |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baldrighi et al. (2017) | Ecology and biodiversity of meiofauna in extreme environments | Meiofauna and Macrofauna | Lucky Strike, Mid Atlantic Ridge, Atlantic Ocean | Deep sea |
| Chen et al. (2017) | Ecology and biodiversity of meiofauna in changing environments | Nematodes | Malaysia | Polluted area |
| Gomes-Júnior et al. (2017) | Taxonomy of meiofauna in extreme and changing environments | Tardigrada | Brazilian Continental Shelf, Southwestern Atlantic Ocean | Oil and gas impact area |
| Polese et al. (2017) | Ecology and biodiversity of meiofauna in changing environments | Meiofauna | Thyrrenian Sea, Mediterranean Sea | Polluted area |
| Quang et al. (2017) | Ecology and biodiversity of meiofauna in changing environments | Nematodes | Sai Gon River harbours, Vietnam | Polluted area |
| Rosli et al. (2017) | Ecology and biodiversity of meiofauna in extreme environments | Meiofauna | Worldwide | Deep sea |
| Semprucci et al. (2017) | Ecology and biodiversity of meiofauna in changing environments | Meiofauna and Nematodes | Adriatic Sea, Mediterranean Sea | Polluted area |
| Singh et al. (2017) | Ecology and biodiversity of meiofauna in extreme environments | Foraminifera | South-Eastern Arabian Sea | Deep sea and Oxygen Minimum Zone |
| Zeppilli et al. (2017) | Ecology and biodiversity of meiofauna in extreme environments | Meiofauna | Worldwide | Mangroves, submarine caves, Polar ecosystems, hypersaline areas, hypoxic/anoxic environments, hydrothermal vents, cold seeps, carcasses/sunken woods, deep-sea canyons, deep hypersaline anoxic basins and hadal zones |
The first contribution to this Special Issue provides a description of a new marine arthrotardigrade species (Gomes-Júnior et al. 2017). Ligiarctus alatus sp. nov. was discovered in sediments of the Brazilian continental shelf in the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean, from sites located in the major oil extraction basins in Brazil (Campos and Potiguar basins). The review of Rosli et al. (2017) describes trends in the ecology of deep-sea meiofauna with focus on patterns and processes at small to regional spatial scales described in studies published since the last review of deep-sea meiofauna of Soltwedel (2000), and highlights areas needing further research. Zeppilli et al. (2017) present an integrated review of the biodiversity, ecology and physiological responses of marine meiofauna inhabiting extreme marine environments, including mangroves, submarine caves, polar ecosystems, hypersaline areas, hypoxic/anoxic environments, hydrothermal vents, cold seeps, carcasses/sunken woods, deep-sea canyons, deep hypersaline anoxic basins and hadal zones. Singh et al. (2017) present a study of the vertical distribution of living benthic foraminiferans from the oxygen minimum zone of the Gulf of Mannar, Southeastern Arabian Sea, which shows how oxygen concentrations impact vertical benthic living foraminiferal distribution. A pilot deep-sea colonisation experiment on the Lucky Strike vent field (Mid-Atlantic Ridge) by Baldrighi et al. (2017) shows that the complex structure of inorganic sponge substrata may favour settlement of juveniles and larvae, and may provide a useful sampling method for ecological studies. Two studies within this special issue show that meiobenthic and nematode assemblages can be used to determine the ecological quality (EcoQ) of highly impacted areas (Semprucci et al. 2017; Chen et al. 2017). Finally, Polese et al. (2017) describe a study of meiofauna from the Phlegraean archipelago (Southern Italy) comparing pristine (Nisida islet) and highly impacted area (Bagnoli), and Quang et al. (2017) describe the impact of toxic tributyltin (TBT) compounds on free-living nematode communities in the Sai Gon River.
The discovery of abundant and well-adapted meiofaunal communities in several environments with extreme conditions has provided new insights into the ecology and physiology of species thriving in challenging settings (e.g., Danovaro et al. 2010; Fontaneto et al. 2015). As well as natural processes, human activities may generate stressful conditions, including deoxygenation, acidification and rises in temperature. The behaviour and physiology of different meiofaunal taxa, such as some foraminiferans, nematode and copepod species, can provide vital information on how organisms may respond to these challenges and can provide a warning signal of anthropogenic impacts. From an evolutionary perspective, the discovery of new meiofauna taxa from extreme environments often sheds light on phylogenetic relationships, while understanding how meiofaunal organisms are able to survive or even flourish in these conditions can explain evolutionary pathways. Finally, there are multiple potential economic benefits to be gained from ecological, biological, physiological and evolutionary studies of meiofauna in extreme environments. Given the many insights to be gained from studies of meiofauna of extreme and changing environments, there is a clear need to continue research capability in this area through multidisciplinary courses such as Meioscool.
Notes
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the western France laboratory cluster (Laboratoire d’Excellence) LabexMER (ANR-10-LABX-19), the French Research Institute for the Exploitation of the Sea (IFREMER), the Institut Carnot, the Total Foundation, the University of Western Brittany and the European Institute for Marine Studies for financing the MeioScool2016 project: Meiofaunal Summer School, held in Brest (27 June–1 July 2016). DZ was supported by the project “Prokaryote-nematode Interaction in marine extreme envirONments: a uniquE source for ExploRation of innovative biomedical applications” (PIONEER) funded by the Total Fondation and IFREMER. We thank Pedro Martinez Arbizu, the editor in chief of Marine Biodiversity, for continuous support and encouragement.
Funding
This study was funded by the western France laboratory cluster (Laboratoire d’Excellence) LabexMER (ANR-10-LABX-19), the French Research Institute for the Exploitation of the Sea (IFREMER), the Institut Carnot, the TotalFoundation, the University of Western Brittany and the European Institute for Marine Studies and by the project“Prokaryote-nematode Interaction in marine extreme envirONments: a uniquE source for ExploRation of innovativebiomedical applications” (PIONEER) funded by the Total Fondation and IFREMER.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Sampling and field studies
All necessary permits for sampling and observational field studies have been obtained by the authors from the competent authorities and are mentioned in the acknowledgements, if applicable.
References
- Baldrighi E, Zeppilli D, Crespin R, Chauvaud P, Pradillon F, Sarrazin J (2017) Colonization of synthetic sponges at the deep-sea Lucky Strike hydrothermal vent field (Mid-Atlantic Ridge): a first insight. Mar Biodiv (this issue)Google Scholar
- Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Leadley P, Thuiller W, Courchamp F (2012) Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecol Lett 15(4):365–377CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Catalan J, Camarero L, Felip M, Pla S, Ventura M, Buchaca T, Bartumeus F, Mendoza GD, Miró A, Casamayor EO, Medina-Sánchez JM (2006) High mountain lakes: extreme habitats and witnesses of environmental changes. Limnetica 25(1–2):551–584Google Scholar
- CAREX (2011) CAREX roadmap for research on life in extreme environment. CAREX Project Office, Strasbourg 48 ppGoogle Scholar
- Chen CA, Soo CL, Balsamo M, Semprucci F (2017) An approach based on nematode descriptors for the classification of ecological quality (EcoQ) of the Malaysian coasts. Mar Biodiv (this issue)Google Scholar
- Danovaro R, Dell’Anno A, Pusceddu A, Gambi C, Heiner I, Kristensen RM (2010) The first metazoa living in permanently anoxic conditions. BMC Biol 8:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fontaneto D, Iakovenko N, De Smet WH (2015) Diversity gradients of rotifer species richness in Antarctica. Hydrobiol 761(1):235–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gomes-Júnior E, Santos E, da Rocha CMC, Santos PJP, Fontoura P (2017) A new species of Ligiarctus (Tardigrada, Arthrotardigrada) from the Brazilian continental shelf, Southwestern Atlantic Ocean. Mar Biodiv (this issue)Google Scholar
- Polese G, Semprucci F, Campoli L, Maselli V, d’Alcalà MR, Balsamo M, Di Cosmo A (2017) Meiofaunal assemblages of the bay of Nisida and the environmental status of the Phlegraean area (Naples, Southern Italy). Mar Biodiv (this issue)Google Scholar
- Quang NX, Yen NTM, Van Dong N, Prozorova L, Smol N, Lins L, Vanreusel A (2017) Nematode communities in the Sai Gon River harbors in relation to tributyltin concentrations. Mar Biodiv (this issue)Google Scholar
- Rosli N, Leduc D, Rowden AA, Probert PK (2017) Review of recent trends in ecological studies of deep-sea meiofauna, with focus on patterns and processes at small to regional spatial scales. Mar Biodiv (this issue)Google Scholar
- Rothschild LJ, Mancinelli RL (2001) Life in extreme environments. Nature 409:1092–1101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schratzberger M, Ingels J (2017) Meiofauna matters: the roles of meiofauna in benthic ecosystems. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. In pressGoogle Scholar
- Semprucci F, Balsamo M, Appolloni L, Sandulli R (2017) Assessment of ecological quality status along the Apulian coasts (eastern Mediterranean Sea) based on meiobenthic and nematode assemblages. Mar Biodiv (this issue)Google Scholar
- Singh DP, Saraswat R, Kaithwar A (2017) Changes in standing stock and vertical distribution of benthic foraminifera along a depth gradient (58–2750 m) in the southeastern Arabian Sea.. Mar Biodiv (this issue)Google Scholar
- Soltwedel T (2000) Metazoan meiobenthos along continental margins: a review. Prog Oceanogr 46:59–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Woodward G (2010) Integrative ecology, volume 43: from molecules to ecosystems. Advances in ecological research. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Zeppilli D, Sarrazin J, Leduc D, Arbizu PM, Fontaneto D, Fontanier C, Gooday AJ, Kristensen RM, Ivanenko VN, Sørensen MV, Vanreusel A, Thébault J, Mea M, Allio N, Andro T, Arvigo A, Castrec J, Danielo M, Foulon V, Fumeron R, Hermabessiere L, Hulot V, James T, Langonne-Augen R, Le Bot T, Long M, Mahabror D, Morel Q, Pantalos M, Pouplard E, Raimondeau L, Rio-Cabello A, Seite S, Traisnel G, Urvoy K, Van Der Stegen T, Weyand M, Fernandes D (2015) Is the meiofauna a good indicator for climate change and anthropogenic impacts? Mar Biodivers 45:505–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zeppilli D, Leduc D, Fontanier C, Fontaneto D, Fuchs S, Gooday AJ, Goineau A, Ingels J, Ivanenko VN, Kristensen RM, Neves RC, Sanchez N, Sandulli R, Sarrazin J, Sørensen MV, Tasiemski A, Vanreusel A, Autret M, Bourdonnay L, Claireaux M, Coquillé V, De Wever L, Rachel D, Marchant J, Toomey L, Fernandes D (2017) Characteristics of meiofauna in extreme marine ecosystems: a review. Mar Biodiv (this issue)Google Scholar
