Advertisement

Marine Biodiversity

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 531–537 | Cite as

Scopoli’s shearwater, Calonectris diomedea, in the southwest Atlantic Ocean

  • Gabriela OliveiraEmail author
  • Guilherme Tavares Nunes
  • Fernanda Pinto Marques
  • Leandro Bugoni
Short Communication

Abstract

Knowledge of marine biodiversity has been increased by combining modern and traditional tools that render species identification an accurate process. In addition, understanding the ecological differences between closely related species is critical for effective conservation. Calonectris (Aves: Procellariidae) is a four-species genus of phenotypically similar pelagic seabirds; three of the four species inhabit the Atlantic Ocean. However, this taxonomic splitting has not been completely recognised in the New World, hindering our understanding of species-specific nonbreeding distributions because of misidentification in nonbreeding areas. Here, we have presented the first Scopoli’s shearwater, Calonectris diomedea, in the southwest Atlantic Ocean by using morphometrics, stable isotope analyses, and bill and plumage colouring. Although the southwest Atlantic Ocean is a common nonbreeding area for the sister species, Cory’s shearwater, Calonectris borealis, and Cape Verde shearwater, Calonectris edwardsii, it has been considered a potential nonbreeding area for Scopoli’s shearwater. This study contributes to the separation of Cory’s shearwater from Scopoli’s shearwater and provides a record of the latter in the southwestern Atlantic Ocean, thus contributing to a better understanding of the nonbreeding range of Scopoli’s shearwater in the New World.

Keywords

Calonectris borealis Cory’s shearwater Morphometrics Procellariiformes Seabirds Stable isotopes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to L.S. Carvalho for preparing the feathers for stable isotope analyses, and F.A. Faria for assistance in preparing the photographs. Authors are grateful to an anonymous reviewer for comments and suggestions on a previous version, which greatly improved the current manuscript. G.O. received a scientific initiation scholarship from CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) during the preparation of the manuscript. G.T.N. and F.P.M. received scholarships from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). L.B. is a research fellow at the Brazilian CNPq (Proc. No. 310550/2015-7).

References

  1. Alonso H, Matias R, Granadeiro JP, Catry P (2009) Moult strategies of Cory’s shearwaters Calonectris diomedea borealis: the influence of colony location, sex and individual breeding status. J Ornithol 150(2):329–337.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-008-0354-2 Google Scholar
  2. American Ornithologists’ Union (1998) Check-list of North American birds: the species of birds of North America from the Arctic through Panama, including the West Indies and Hawaiian Islands. Allen Press, LawrenceGoogle Scholar
  3. Belda EJ, Sánchez A (2001) Seabird mortality on longline fisheries in the western Mediterranean: factors affecting bycatch and proposed mitigation measures. Biol Conserv 98(3):357–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00178-6 Google Scholar
  4. Bugoni L, Furness RW (2009) Age composition and sexual size dimorphism of albatrosses and petrels off Brazil. Mar Ornithol 37(3):253–260Google Scholar
  5. Bugoni L, Mancini PL, Monteiro DS, Nascimento L, Neves TS (2008a) Seabird bycatch in the Brazilian pelagic longline fishery and a review of capture rates in the southwestern Atlantic Ocean. Endang Species Res 5(2–3):137–147.  https://doi.org/10.3354/esr005137 Google Scholar
  6. Bugoni L, Neves TS, Leite-Jr NO, Carvalho D, Sales G, Furness RW, Stein CE, Peppes FV, Giffoni BB, Monteiro DS (2008b) Potential bycatch of seabirds and turtles in hook-and-line fisheries of the Itaipava Fleet, Brazil. Fish Res 90(1–3):217–224.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2007.10.013 Google Scholar
  7. Bugoni L, McGill RAR, Furness RW (2010) The importance of pelagic longline fishery discards for a seabird community determined through stable isotope analysis. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 391(1–2):190–200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2010.06.027 Google Scholar
  8. Fisher A, Flood R (2010) Scopoli’s shearwater off Scilly: new to Britain. Br Birds 103(12):712–717Google Scholar
  9. Gómez-Díaz E, González-Solís J (2007) Geographic assignment of seabirds to their origin: combining morphologic, genetic and biogeochemical analyses. Ecol Appl 17(5):1484–1498.  https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1232.1 Google Scholar
  10. Gómez-Díaz E, González-Solís J, Peinado MA, Page RDM (2006) Phylogeography of the Calonectris shearwaters using molecular and morphometric data. Mol Phylogenet Evol 41(2):322–332.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.05.006 Google Scholar
  11. Gómez-Díaz E, González-Solís J, Peinado MA (2009) Population structure in a highly pelagic seabird the Cory’s shearwater Calonectris diomedea: an examination of genetics, morphology and ecology. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 382:197–209.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07974 Google Scholar
  12. González-Solís J, Croxall JP, Oro D, Ruiz X (2007) Trans-equatorial migration and mixing in the wintering areas of a pelagic seabird. Front Ecol Environ 5(6):297–301.  https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[297:TMAMIT]2.0.CO Google Scholar
  13. Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson RJG (1998) A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol 7(8):1071–1075.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00389.x Google Scholar
  14. Gutiérrez R (1998) Flight identification of Cory’s and Scopoli’s shearwaters. Dutch Birding 20(5):216–225Google Scholar
  15. Harrison P (1985) Seabirds, an identification guide. Houghton Mifflin Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  16. Howell SNG (2012) Petrels, albatrosses and storm-petrels of North America: a photographic guide. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  17. Howell SNG, Patteson B (2008) Variation in Cory’s and Scopoli’s shearwaters. Alula 14(1):12–16Google Scholar
  18. Jiménez S, Domingo A, Brazeiro A (2009) Seabird bycatch in the southwest Atlantic: interaction with the Uruguayan pelagic longline fishery. Polar Biol 32(2):187–196.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-008-0519-8 Google Scholar
  19. Lima PC, Grantsau R, Lima RCFR, Santos SS (2004) Occurrence and mortality of seabirds along the northern coast of Bahia, and the identification key of the Procellariiformes Order and the Stercorariidae Family. Atual Ornitol 121:1–63Google Scholar
  20. Longhurst A, Sathyendranath S, Platt T, Caverhill C (1995) An estimate of global primary production in the ocean from satellite radiometer data. J Plankton Res 17(6):1245–1271.  https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/17.6.1245 Google Scholar
  21. McMahon KW, Hamady LL, Thorrold SR (2013) A review of ecogeochemistry approaches to estimating movements of marine animals. Limnol Oceanogr 58(2):697–714.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2013.58.2.0697 Google Scholar
  22. Medrano JF, Aasen E, Sharrow L (1990) DNA extraction from nucleated red blood cells. BioTechniques 8(1):43Google Scholar
  23. Onley D, Scofield P (2007) Field guide to the albatrosses, petrels and shearwaters of the world. Christopher Helm, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Oro D, Genovart M, Igual JM, Ruiz X, González-Solís J (2008) Rutes migratòries i àrees d’hivernada del Virot Gros Calonectris diomedea des Pantaleu (Mallorca). Anu Ornitol Balears 23(1):37–41Google Scholar
  25. Perón C, Grémillet D, Culioli J-M, Faggio G, Gillet P, Mante A, Vidal P (2012) Exploring marine habitats of two shearwater species breeding on French Mediterranean islands. In Yésou P., Baccetti N, Sultana J (eds) Ecology and conservation of Mediterranean seabirds and other bird species under the Barcelona Convention: update and progress. Proceedings of the 13th Medmaravis Pan-Mediterranean Symposium, Alghero, Sardinia, Italy, 14–17 October 2011, pp 19–25Google Scholar
  26. Petry MV, Bugoni L, Fonseca VSS (2000) Occurrence of the Cape Verde shearwater Calonectris edwardsii on the Brazilian coast. Bull Br Ornithol Club 120(3):198–200Google Scholar
  27. Petry MV, Krüger L, Fonseca VSS, Brummelhaus J, Piuco RC (2009) Diet and ingestion of synthetics by Cory’s shearwater Calonectris diomedea off southern Brazil. J Ornithol 150(3):601–606.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-009-0373-7 Google Scholar
  28. Piacentini VQ, Aleixo A, Agne CA, Maurício GN, Pacheco JF, Bravo GA, Brito GRR, Naka LN, Olmos F, Posso S, Silveira LF, Betini GS, Carrano E, Franz I, Lees AC, Lima LM, Pioli D, Schunck F, Amaral FR, Bencke GA, Cohn-Haft M, Figueiredo LFA, Straube FC, Cesari E (2015) Annotated checklist of the birds of Brazil by the Brazilian Ornithological Records Committee. Rev Bras Ornitol 23(2):91–298Google Scholar
  29. Piola AR, Möller-Jr OO, Guerrero RA, Campos EJD (2008) Variability of the subtropical shelf front off eastern South America: winter 2003 and summer 2004. Cont Shelf Res 28(13):1639–1648.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2008.03.013 Google Scholar
  30. Remsen-Jr JV, Cadena CD, Jaramillo A, Nores M, Pacheco JF, Pérez-Emán J, Robbins MB, Stiles FG, Stotz DF, Zimmer KJ (2016) A classification of the bird species of South America. American Ornithologists’ Union. http://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline.html. Accessed 22 June 2016
  31. Robb M, Mullarney K, The Sound Approach (2008) Petrels night and day: a sound approach guide. The Sound Approach, PooleGoogle Scholar
  32. Sangster G, Collinson JM, Crochet PA, Knox AG, Parkin DT, Votier SC (2012) Taxonomic recommendations for British birds: eighth report. Ibis 154(4):874–883.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2012.01273.x Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriela Oliveira
    • 1
    Email author
  • Guilherme Tavares Nunes
    • 1
  • Fernanda Pinto Marques
    • 1
  • Leandro Bugoni
    • 1
  1. 1.Waterbirds and Sea Turtles Laboratory, Instituto de Ciências BiológicasUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande – FURGRio GrandeBrazil

Personalised recommendations