Marine Biodiversity

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 647–657 | Cite as

Diversity of midwater cephalopods in the northern Gulf of Mexico: comparison of two collecting methods

Recent Advances in Knowledge of Cephalopod Biodiversity

Abstract

The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill (DWHOS) necessitated a whole-water-column approach for assessment that included the epipelagic (0–200 m), mesopelagic (200–1000 m), and bathypelagic (>1000 m) biomes. The latter two biomes collectively form the largest integrated habitat in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM). As part of the Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) process, the Offshore Nekton Sampling and Analysis Program (ONSAP) was implemented to evaluate impacts from the spill and to enhance basic knowledge regarding the biodiversity, abundance, and distribution of deep-pelagic GOM fauna. Over 12,000 cephalopods were collected during this effort, using two different trawl methods (large midwater trawl [LMT] and 10-m2 Multiple Opening and Closing Net Environmental Sensing System [MOC10]). Prior to this work, 93 species of cephalopods were known from the GOM. Eighty cephalopod species were sampled by ONSAP, and additional analyses will certainly increase this number as hard-to-identify taxa are resolved. Of these species, seven were previously unknown in the GOM, including two probable undescribed species. Because additional work is continuing using only the MOC10, cephalopod species composition of the LMT and MOC10 trawls are compared here for possible differences in inferred diversity and relative abundance. More than twice as many specimens were collected with the LMTs than the MOC10, but the numbers of species were similar between the two gear types. Each gear type collected eight species that were not collected by the other type.

Keywords

Deep sea Cephalopods Gulf of Mexico MOCNESS Trawl 

References

  1. Clarke MR (1977) Beaks, nets, and numbers. Symp Zool Soc Lond 38:89–126Google Scholar
  2. Colwell RK (2013) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9 and earlier, user’s guide and application. http://purl.oclc.org/estimates
  3. Gotelli N, Colwell RK (2004) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4:379–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Heino M, Porteiro FM, Sutton TT, Falkenhaug T, Godo OR, Piatkowski U (2011) Catchability of pelagic trawls for sampling deep-living nekton in the mid-North Atlantic. ICES J Mar Sci 68:377–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hoving HJ, Perez J, Bolstad K, Braid H, Evans A, Fuchs D, Judkins H, Kelly J, Marian J, Nakajima R, Piatkowski U, Reid A, Vecchione M, Xavier J (2014) The study of deep-sea cephalopods. In: Vidal E (ed). Adv Mar Biol 67: 235–259Google Scholar
  6. Judkins H (2009) Cephalopods of the Broad Caribbean: distribution, abundance and ecological importance. Dissertation; University of South FloridaGoogle Scholar
  7. Judkins H, Arbuckle S, Vecchione M, Garrison L, Martinez A (2013) Cephalopods in the potential prey field of sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) (Cetacea: Physeteridae) in the northern Gulf of Mexico. J Nat Hist. doi:10.1080/00222933.2013.802045 Google Scholar
  8. Lipka DA (1975) The systematics and zoogeography of cephalopods from the Gulf of Mexico. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TexasGoogle Scholar
  9. Mangold (1922–2003) KM, Vecchione M, Young RE (2014) Ocythoidae Gray 1849. Ocythoe tuberculata Rafinesque, 1814. Version 06 July 2014 (under construction) http://tolweb.org/Ocythoe_tuberculata/20205/2014.07.06 in The Tree of Life Web Project, http://tolweb.org/
  10. Passarella KC (1990) Oceanic cephalopod assemblage in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Master’s Thesis, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FLGoogle Scholar
  11. Ramirez-Llodra E, Brandt A, Danovaro D, De Mol B, Escobar E, German CR, Levin LA, Martinez Arbizu P, Menot L, Buhl-Morternsen P, Narayanaswamy BE, Smith CR, Tittensor DP, Tyler PA, Vanreusel A, Vecchione M (2010) Deep, diverse and definitely different: unique attributes of the world’s largest ecosystem. Biogeosciences 7:2851–2899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Roper CFE (1964) Enoploteuthis anapsis, a new species of enoploteuthid squid (Cephalopoda: Oegopsidae) from the Atlantic Ocean. Bull Mar Sci Gulf Caribb 14(1):140–148Google Scholar
  13. Roper CFE (1977) Comparative captures of pelagic cephalopods by midwater trawls. Symp Zool Soc Lond 38:61–87Google Scholar
  14. Roper CFE, Lu CC, Mangold K (1969) A new species of Illex from the western Atlantic and distributional aspects of other Illex species (Cephalopoda:Oegopsidae). Proc Biol Soc Wash 82:295–322Google Scholar
  15. Sanders HL (1968) Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. Am Nat 102:243–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Snelgrove PVR, Smith CR (2002) A riot of species in an environmental calm; the paradox of the species-rich deep sea. Oceanogr Mar Biol 40:311–342Google Scholar
  17. Stuart CT, Rex MA, Etter RJ (2003) Large-scale spatial and temporal patterns of deep-sea benthic species diversity. In: Tyler PA (ed) Ecosystems of the world. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 295–313Google Scholar
  18. Sutton T (2013) Vertical ecology of the pelagic ocean: classical patterns and new perspectives. J Fish Biol 83:1508–1527. doi:10.1111/jfb.12263 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sutton TT, Porteiro FM, Heino M, Byrkjedal I, Langhelle G, Anderson CIH, Horne J et al (2008) Vertical structure, biomass and topographic association of deep-pelagic fishes in relation to a mid-ocean ridge system. Deep-Sea Res II 55:161–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vecchione M (2003) Cephalopods. In: Carpenter KE(ed) The living marine resources of the Western Central Atlantic. Volume 1. Introduction, mollusks, crustaceans, hagfishes, sharks, batoid fishes and chimeras. FAO Identification Guide for Fisheries Purposes. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, pp 150–244Google Scholar
  21. Vecchione M, Young RE, Piatkowski U (2010) Cephalopods of the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Mar Biol Res 6:25–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vecchione M, Sosnowski A, Young RE (2015) Walvisteuthis jeremiahi n. sp. (Mollusca: Cephalopoda), an onychoteuthid squid from the Gulf of Mexico. Proc Biol Soc Wash 128(2):164–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Voss GL (1956) A review of the cephalopods of the Gulf of Mexico. Bull Mar Sci Gulf Caribb 6(2):85–178Google Scholar
  24. Voss GL (1964) A note on some cephalopods from Brazil with a description of a new species of octopod, Eledone massyae. Bull Mar Sci Gulf Caribb 14(3):511–516Google Scholar
  25. Voss NA, Voss GL (1962) Two new species of squids of the genus Calliteuthis from the Western Atlantic with a redescription of Calliteuthis reversa Verrill. Bull Mar Sci Gulf Caribb 12(2):169–200Google Scholar
  26. Webb TJ, Vanden Berghe E, O’Dor R (2010) Biodiversity’s big wet secret: the global distribution of marine biological records reveals chronic under-exploitation of the deep pelagic ocean. PLoS ONE 5(8):e10223. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010223 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of South Florida St PetersburgSt PetersburgUSA
  2. 2.NMFS National Systematics LaboratoryNational Museum of Natural HistoryWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.Halmos College of Natural Sciences and OceanographyNova Southeastern UniversityDania BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations