Advertisement

Marine Biodiversity

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 521–524 | Cite as

Mobility and self-righting by a free-living mushroom coral through pulsed inflation

  • Bert W. Hoeksema
  • Pim Bongaerts
Open Access
Short Communication

Abstract

Locomotion and self-righting in an overturned juvenile mushroom coral, Herpolitha limax, was documented and analyzed by the use of time-lapse photography. The coral used a series of rhythmic polyp expansions and contractions to move itself. The complete process of the righting took place within six hours, consisting of a stationary phase, a shuffle phase, a sudden flip-over, and a recovery phase. The mouth of the coral may be used to eject water, which can perhaps be applied as a means of jet propulsion. This report demonstrates that time-lapse photography can be applied to analyze all kinds of behavior in marine invertebrates that move too slow for regular observations.

Key words

Behavior Flip-over Hopping Jet propulsion Locomotion Overturning Shuffle phase Time-lapse photography 

Introduction

More than 70% (n = 55) of all recent mushroom coral species (Scleractinia: Fungiidae) have a free-living adult phase in their life history (Gittenberger et al. 2011; Benzoni et al. 2012), which is the so-called anthocyathus stage (Wells 1966; Hoeksema 1989). Only as juveniles in the anthocaulus stage, free-living fungiids are still attached to a solid substratum by a stalk, regardless of whether they have a single mouth or more than one (Hoeksema and Gittenberger 2010; Hoeksema and Benzoni 2013). Subsequent detachment takes place in the upper part of the stalk by dissolution of the calcareous skeleton across a distinct plane just below the polyp disc (Yamashiro and Yamazato 1996). After detachment, initially a scar remains visible on the aboral side of the polyp disc (Vizel et al. 2009; Hoeksema and Yeemin 2011).

As free-living corals, fungiids are able to colonize all kinds of substrata. These include sandy bottoms at > 20 m depth, which are usually not inhabited by many other bottom organisms and where mushroom corals can form dense aggregations (Goreau and Yonge 1968; Fisk 1983; Hoeksema 2012). They may also inhabit reef slopes where they can dominate over other benthic organisms (Goffredo and Chadwick-Furman 2000; Hoeksema and Matthews 2011; Hoeksema and Benzoni 2013). Free-living fungiids may use their mobility in densely inhabited habitats to escape from harmful interactions, or they may aggressively damage competitors (Chadwick 1988; Chadwick-Furman and Loya 1992; Hoeksema and De Voogd 2012; Hoeksema et al. 2014). The flip side of a free mode of life is that mushroom corals may accidentally get overturned by other animals or by tumbling down-slope (Jokiel and Cowdin 1976; Hoeksema 1988; Chadwick-Furman and Loya 1992). This is unfavorable because it would incapacitate their ability to capture food, for which an upright position would be most suitable (Hoeksema and Waheed 2012; Mehrotra et al. 2015).

Although it is known that mushroom corals may undergo sessile dispersal by their migration over the seafloor (Hoeksema 1988; Nishihira and Poung-In 1989; Gittenberger and Hoeksema 2013), only few reports are known concerning active mobility resulting from their own movements (Abe 1939; Horridge 1957; Hubbard 1972; Jokiel and Cowdin 1976; Yamashiro and Nishihira 1995). In the present report, we present detailed information on a flip-over experiment in which mushroom corals were overturned to document their self-righting technique with the help of time-lapse photography.

Materials and methods

Three specimens of three mushroom coral species were collected from the reef of Heron Island (Great Barrier Reef, Australia): the elongate, polystomatous Herpolitha limax (Esper, 1797), the oval-shaped, monostomatous Lobactis scutaria (Lamarck, 1801), and the disk-shaped, monostomatous Pleuractis granulosa (Klunzinger, 1879). First, they were kept in seawater basins with flowing seawater at Heron Island Research Station in normal daylight regime. For the duration of the experiment, they were brought to a laboratory and placed upside-down on a substrate consisting of coarse sand inside a self-contained aquarium. This tank is a commercially available Dymax® IQ5 Mini Acryclic Aquarium (Coburg, Australia) with a built-in filtration system and a 43 dual colour LED lamp burning continuously during the experiment. The tank contained 13 l of seawater (25 °C) and its bottom measures 27×22 cm2.

Coral movements were documented by use of time-lapse photography (Bongaerts et al. 2012). The corals had their tentacles expanded and showed rhythmic pulses of inflation and exhalation, and slightly shifted their position, but the specimens of L. scutaria and P. granulosa, were not able to turn over within an available time frame of 10 h.

One small individual of ∼7 cm in length of H. limax , with a relatively large primary mouth and three small secondary mouths aligned along its main axis, managed to overturn itself within only 6 h. The process of this flip-over is described and discussed by showing still shots extracted from a 900× time-lapse movie (see ESM). A second sequence of movements (2 h 15 min long) without overturning has been filmed to obtain additional information on the pulse frequency, which was measured as the mean time interval between two pulses, visible as shuffles and hops.

Results

The complete flip-over process consisted of four phases, which took less than 6 h to complete: (1) a stationary phase of ∼1 h in which the coral only waved its tentacles (Fig. 1a); (2) a shuffle phase (3 h 15 min long), in which the coral hopped and shifted 11 times over the sand with the oral side remaining close to the bottom and occasionally appearing to become detached from it, and with increasing force (Fig. 1b-f); (3) the flip-over phase, in which the oral side became lifted away from the sand by the coral turning over its side (Fig. 1g-i), which was concluded by a sudden flip-over at 4:51 h (Fig. 1j); and (4) the subsequent recovery phase (Fig. 1k-l). During the second movie, only part of a shuffle phase was recorded.
Fig. 1

Still shots from time-lapse video (6 h long) showing cycles of tissue inflation and deflation in a Herpolitha limax specimen (length ∼7 cm) after being overturned: a stationary phase, b-f shuffling and hopping, g-i turning phase, j flip-over, k-l recovery. Time moments are indicated in hours and minutes, h:min). Red square: reference point

The mean time interval between two jumps as registered in both film shots together was 22.5 min (s.d. 7.9 min, n  = 17). After every inflation the aboral side became lifted upward and sank down again, resembling hopping, with increasing amplitude but without a clear change in frequency. The body mass swelled up and curled somewhat around the exposed aboral side while the tentacles expanded and retracted. During the turning, one side gradually rose more than the other and one flip-over attempt failed to be completed (Fig. 1i). During the second try, the coral succeeded (Fig. 1j). At the start of the recovery the mouth was open (Fig. 1k), suggesting that water had been ejected from it. Eventually, the coral polyp became deflated and shrank (Fig. 1l).

Discussion

This is the first time that self-righting in free-living corals is documented, analysed and published with the help of time-lapse photography. Abe (1939) used a kimograph and direct observations to study the righting in Heliofungia actiniformis (Quoy and Gaimard, 1833), a mushroom coral species with a large, fleshy polyp and long tentacles. According to him the mouth of the coral opened just after the flip-over while it was shut during the move itself. Hubbard (1972) studied self-righting in a small mushroom coral species, Cycloseris distorta Michelin, 1842, and observed that it is able to use jet propulsion before the final flip-over. The mushroom coral of the video movie had its primary mouth open just after landing (Fig. 1k). This suggests that it was used for jet propulsion during the flip-over, which could not be seen because the oral side was directed downward and away from the camera.

Previously, time-lapse photography in laboratory conditions was applied to study sediment shedding in a mushroom coral (Bongaerts et al. 2012). This method was also used to study locomotion in Cycloseris distorta, which showed that this mushroom coral uses peristaltic movements to crawl toward light (Yamashiro and Nishihira 1995). Besides mushroom corals, righting and migration have also been observed in other free-living corals, such as in the Caribbean Manicina areolata (Linnaeus, 1758) (see Fabricius 1964; Hubman et al. 2002; Uhrin et al. 2005) and the Indo-Pacific Heteropsammia cochlea (Spengler, 1781) (see Goreau and Yonge 1968). The latter studies were based on field studies.

Righting in free-living corals may take much time and can, therefore, be difficult to observe. It has to be stressed that the present observations concern a single small, coral individual. All observed corals, regardless of their species identity, showed similar behavior (see also Hubbard 1972). Duration of the hopping intervals and the entire flip-over process is expected to vary among individual corals because mushroom corals of some species are more frequently found in upside-down position than those of others, which may depend on their weight, size, and shape, as well as depth, substrate type, and steepness of the reef slope (Hoeksema 1988; Gittenberger and Hoeksema 2013; Mondal and Raghunathan 2015). The largest and heaviest free-living corals are probably the least acrobatic.

An elongated corallum shape and a low coral weight as in the present specimen may have helped to complete this observation. Both corals that did not manage to right themselves within the available filming time, may have been too heavy (in the case of Lobactis scutaria) or not slender enough for a sideways flipover (in the case of Pleuractis granulosa). Many mushroom corals are round and may indeed become large and heavy (Hoeksema 1991). Such corals can probably become displaced during storms (Hoeksema 1988), after which they can still free themselves from sediment by the use of pulsed body inflation (Bongaerts et al. 2012).

Earlier observations (Yamashiro and Nishihira 1995; Bond 2013) and the present results show that lime-lapse photography can be of much help in observing mobility of corals and other invertebrates. In future studies, all kinds of free-living coral species can be studied in this way, such as the West Atlantic species Manicina areolota (Linnaeus, 1758) and Meandrina danae (Milne Edwards and Haime, 1848) (Johnson 1988; Meesters et al. 2012), and the Indo-Pacific Heteropsammia spp. and Heterocyathus spp. (Goreau and Yonge 1968; Hoeksema and Best 1991; Hoeksema and Matthews 2015). The latter species are famous for their symbiosis with a sipunculan worm, which slowly pulls the corals over the seafloor. Time-lapse photography may be able to show what kind of behavior is performed by such free-living corals when they are placed in various densities and on different kinds of substrates.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We want thank two anonymous reviewers for their supportive and constructive comments.

Supplementary material

ESM 1

Time-lapse movie of an overturned Herpolitha limax coral (lateral view), in the process of self-righting. (MPG 44696 kb)

References

  1. Abe N (1939) Migration and righting reaction of the coral Fungia actiniformis var. palawensis Döderlein. Palao Trop Biol Sta Stud 4:671–694Google Scholar
  2. Benzoni F, Arrigoni R, Stefani F, Reijnen BT, Montano S, Hoeksema BW (2012) Phylogenetic position and taxonomy of Cycloseris explanulata and C. wellsi (Scleractinia: Fungiidae): lost mushroom corals find their way home. Contrib Zool 81:125–146Google Scholar
  3. Bond C (2013) Locomotion and contraction in an asconoid calcareous sponge. Invertebr Biol 132:283–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bongaerts P, Hoeksema BW, Hay KB, Hoegh-Guldberg O (2012) Mushroom corals overcome live burial through pulsed inflation. Coral Reefs 31:399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chadwick NE (1988) Competition and locomotion in a freeliving fungiid coral. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 123:189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chadwick-Furman NE, Loya Y (1992) Migration, habitat use, and competition among mobile corals (Scleractinia: Fungiidae) in the Gulf of Eilat, Red Sea. Mar Biol 114:617–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fabricius F (1964) Active Lage- und Ortveränderung bei der Koloniekoralle Manicina areolata und ihre paläoökologische Bedeutung. Senckenb Lethaea 45:299–323Google Scholar
  8. Fisk DA (1983) Free-living corals: distributions according to plant cover, sediments, hydrodynamics, depth and biological factors. Mar Biol 74:287–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gittenberger A, Hoeksema BW (2013) Habitat preferences of coral-associated wentletrap snails (Gastropoda: Epitoniidae). Contrib Zool 82:1–25Google Scholar
  10. Gittenberger A, Reijnen BT, Hoeksema BW (2011) A molecularly based phylogeny reconstruction of mushroom corals (Scleractinia: Fungiidae) with taxonomic consequences and evolutionary implications for growth forms and life history traits. Contrib Zool 80:107–132Google Scholar
  11. Goffredo S, Chadwick-Furman NE (2000) Abundance and distribution of mushroom corals (Scleractinia: Fungiidae) on a coral reef at Eilat, northern Red Sea. Bull Mar Sci 66:241–254Google Scholar
  12. Goreau TF, Yonge CM (1968) Coral community on muddy sand. Nature 217:421–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoeksema BW (1988) Mobility of free-living fungiid corals (Scleractinia) a dispersion mechanism and survival strategy in dynamic reef habitats. Proc 6th Int Coral Reef Symp 2:715–720Google Scholar
  14. Hoeksema BW (1989) Taxonomy, phylogeny and biogeography of mushroom corals (Scleractinia: Fungiidae). Zool Verh 254:1–295Google Scholar
  15. Hoeksema BW (1991) Evolution of body size in mushroom corals (Scleractinia: Fungiidae) and its ecomorphological consequences. Neth J Zool 41:122–139Google Scholar
  16. Hoeksema BW (2012) Distribution patterns of mushroom corals (Scleractinia: Fungiidae) across the Spermonde Shelf, South Sulawesi. Raffles Bull Zool 60:183–212Google Scholar
  17. Hoeksema BW, Benzoni F (2013) Multispecies aggregations of mushroom corals in the Gambier Islands, French Polynesia. Coral Reefs 32:1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoeksema BW, Best MB (1991) New observations on scleractinian corals from Indonesia: 2. Sipunculan-associated species belonging to the genera Heterocyathus and Heteropsammia. Zool Meded 65:221–245Google Scholar
  19. Hoeksema BW, de Voogd NJ (2012) On the run: free-living mushroom corals avoiding interaction with sponges. Coral Reefs 31:455–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoeksema BW, Gittenberger A (2010) High densities of mushroom coral fragments at West Halmahera, Indonesia. Coral Reefs 29:691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoeksema BW, Matthews JL (2011) Contrasting bleaching patterns in mushroom coral assemblages at Koh Tao, Gulf of Thailand. Coral Reefs 30:95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoeksema BW, Matthews JL (2015) Partial bleaching in an assemblage of small apozooxanthellate corals of the genera Heteropsammia and Heterocyathus. Coral Reefs. doi: 10.1007/s00338-015-1314-y Google Scholar
  23. Hoeksema BW, Waheed Z (2012) It pays to have a big mouth: mushroom corals ingesting salps at northwest Borneo. Mar Biodiv 42:297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoeksema BW, Yeemin T (2011) Late detachment conceals serial budding by the free-living coral Fungia fungites in the Inner Gulf of Thailand. Coral Reefs 30:975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoeksema BW, Dekker F, de Voogd NJ (2014) Free-living mushroom corals strike back by overtopping a coral-killing sponge. Mar Biodiv 44:3–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Horridge GA (1957) The co-ordination of the protective retraction of coral polyps. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 240:495–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hubbard JAEB (1972) Diaseris distorta, an “acrobatic” coral. Nature 236:457–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hubman B, Piller WE, Riegl B (2002) Functional morphology of coral shape and passive hydrodynamic self-righting in Recent Manicina areolata. Senckenb Lethaea 82:125–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson KG (1988) Size, meander pattern, and behavior in the Caribbean free-living meandroid coral Manicina areolata (Linnaeus). Proc 6th Int Coral Reef Symp 3:403–408Google Scholar
  30. Jokiel PL, Cowdin HP (1976) Hydromechanical adaptation in the solitary free-living coral Fungia scuturia. Nature 262:212–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meesters EH, Mueller B, Nugues MM (2012) Caribbean free-living coral species co-occurring deep off the windward coast of Curaçao. Coral Reefs 32:109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mehrotra R, Scott CM, Rohrer JM, Hoeksema BW (2015) Predation on a sacoglossan gastropod by a mushroom coral. Coral Reefs 34:517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mondal T, Raghunathan C (2015) Locomotion of anthocyathus mushroom corals (Scleractinia: Fungiidae) of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Indian J Mar Sci 44(6):12, 7 ppGoogle Scholar
  34. Nishihira M, Poung-In S (1989) Distribution and population structure of a free-living coral, Diaseris fragilis, at Khang Khao Island in the Gulf of Thailand. Galaxea 8:271–282Google Scholar
  35. Uhrin AV, Slade CL, Holmquist JF (2005) Self righting in the free-living coral Manicina areolata (Cnidaria: Scleractinia): morphological constraints. Caribb J Sci 40:277–282Google Scholar
  36. Vizel M, Kramarsky-Winter E, Loya Y (2009) Mushroom coral regeneration from a detached stalk. Coral Reefs 28:939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wells JW (1966) Evolutionary development in the scleractinian family Fungiidae. Symp Zool Soc Lond 16:223–246Google Scholar
  38. Yamashiro H, Nishihira M (1995) Phototaxis in Fungiidae corals (Scleractinia). Mar Biol 124:461–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yamashiro H, Yamazato K (1996) Morphological studies of the soft tissues involved in skeletal dissolution in the coral Fungia fungites. Coral Reefs 15:177–180Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Marine ZoologyNaturalis Biodiversity CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Institute of Biology LeidenLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Global Change InstituteThe University of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations