Marine Biodiversity

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 581–593 | Cite as

Xenophyophores (Protista, Foraminifera) from the Clarion-Clipperton Fracture Zone with description of three new species

  • O. E. Kamenskaya
  • A. J. Gooday
  • O. S. Tendal
  • V. F. Melnik
Original Paper

Abstract

We describe three new and one poorly-known species of psamminid xenophyophores (giant foraminifera), all of which were found attached to polymetallic nodules in the Russian claim area of the Clarion-Clipperton Fracture Zone (CCFZ; abyssal eastern equatorial Pacific, 4,716–4,936 m water depth). Semipsammina licheniformis sp. nov. is the second species of the genus to be formally described. The test encrusts the surface of the host nodule forming a flat structure with a rounded outline and rather irregular concentric zonation. The wall comprises a single layer, composed mainly of radiolarian skeletons, covering granellare branches and stercomata strings that lie directly adjacent to the nodule surface. Psammina multiloculata sp. nov. has an approximately semi-circular, upright test with a weak concentric zonation that is attached to the nodule by a short stalk. The outer test layer comprises radiolarian fragments, sponge spicules, and mineral grains; the interior is divided into small compartments containing the stercomare and granellare. Psammina limbata sp. nov. has a plate-like, sometimes curved, semi-circular test attached to the nodule surface by basal root-like structures. The composition of the test is similar to that of P. multiloculata, but the interior is not compartmentalised. The most distinctive feature is the lighter colour of the curved outer margin compared to other parts of test. With the addition of these and other species described during recent decades, Psammina has become a rather unwieldy taxon that requires revision. Spiculammina delicata Kamenskaya 2005, previously known from a single specimen, is the most abundant species in our collection. The test exhibits considerable morphological variation, particularly in terms of the degree of branching. The new specimens confirm the placement of this species in the family Psamminidae rather than the Syringamminidae, which it superficially resembles, as well as its sessile mode of life. Two additional species in our material, Stannophyllum radiolarium Haeckel, 1889 and Stannophyllum sp., belong to the order Stannomida. Like the psamminid species, both were found attached to nodules. Xenophyophores are a dominant megafaunal taxon within the CCFZ. Although limited, our new material suggests that this region hosts many novel taxa.

Keywords

Protista Xenophyophores Megabenthos Polymetallic nodules Eastern equatorial Pacific Abyssal 

References

  1. Brady HB (1883) Syringammina, a new type of arenaceous Rhizopoda. Proc R Soc Lond 35:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buchanan JB (1960) On Jullienella and Schizammina, two genera of arenaceous foraminifera from the tropical Atlantic, with a description of a new species. Zool J Linn Soc-Lond 44:270–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gooday AJ, Aranda da Silva A, Pawlowski J (2011) Xenophyophores (Rhizaria, Foraminifera) from the Nazaré Canyon (Portuguese margin, NE Atlantic). Deep-Sea Res II 58:2401–2419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gooday AJ, Tendal OS (1988) New xenophyophores (Protista) from the bathyal and abyssal north-east Atlantic Ocean. J Nat Hist 22:413–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Haeckel E (1889) Report on the deep-sea Keratosa collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. Report of the scientific results of the voyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. Zoology 82:2Google Scholar
  6. Hayward BW, Gordon DP (1984) A new species of the agglutinating foraminifer Julienella (Schizamminidae) from New Zealand. J Foram Res 14:111–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hughes JA, Gooday AJ (2004) Association between living benthic foraminifera and dead tests of Syringammina fragilissima (Xenophyophorea) in the Darvin Mounds region (NE Atlantic). Deep-Sea Res I 51:1741–1758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kamenskaya OE (2005) Spiculammina delicata gen. et sp. n., a new xenophyophore from the eastern Pacific (Psamminidae). Invertebr Zool 2 1:23–27Google Scholar
  9. Kamenskaya, OE, Saidova KhM (1998) Redescription of Psammina planata (Saidova, 1970), a hadal xenophyophore from the Kurile-Kamchatka Trench. In: A.P. Kuznetsov and O.N. Zezina (eds.) Benthos of the High Latitude Regions. Moscow:137Google Scholar
  10. Kamenskaya OE, Melnik VF, Gooday AJ (2013) Giant protists (xenophyophores and komokiaceans) from the Clarion-Clipperton ferromanganese nodule field (Eastern Pacific). Biol Bull Rev 3(5):388–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Laubenfels MV (1948) The order Keratosa of the phylum Porifera - a monographic study. Occas Pap Allan Hancock Found 3:1–217Google Scholar
  12. Lecroq B, Gooday AJ, Tsuchiya M, Pawlowski J (2009) A new genus of xenophyophores (Foraminifera) from the Japan Trench: morphological description, molecular phylogeny and elemental analysis. Zool J Linn Soc-Lond 156:455–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Levin LA (1994) Paleoecology and ecology of xenophyophores. Palaios 5:32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Levin LA, Thomas CL (1988) The ecology of the xenophyophores (Protista) on eastern Pacific seamounts. Deep-Sea Res 35(12):2003–2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Levin LA, DeMaster DJ, McCann LD, Thomas CL (1986) Effects of giant protozoans (class: Xenophyophorea) on deep seamount benthos. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 29:99–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mullineaux LS (1987) Organisms living on manganese nodules and crusts: distribution and abundance at three North Pacific sites. Deep-Sea Res 34:165–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nørvang A (1961) Schizamminidae, a new family of foraminifera. Atlantide Rep 6:169–201, Pls I – IXGoogle Scholar
  18. Pawlowski J, Holzmann M, Fahrni J, Richardson SL (2003) Small subunit ribosomal DNA suggest that xenophyophorean Syringammina corbicula is a foraminiferan. J Eukaryotic Microbiol 50:483–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pawlowski J, Holzmann M, Tyszka J (2013) New supraordinal classification of foraminifera: molecules meet morphology. Mar Micropaleontol 100:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pearcey FG (1914) Foraminifera of the Scottish antarctic expedition. Trans Royal Soc Edinburgh 49:991–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Saidova KM (1970) Benthic foraminifers in the Kurile-Kamhatka region based on the data of the 39th cruise of the R/V Vityaz. Tr Inst Okeanol 86:134–161Google Scholar
  22. Schulze FE (1907a) Die Xenophyophoren, eine besondere Gruppe der Rhizopoden. -Wiss. Ergebn. dt. Tiefsee-Exped. Valdivia 11:1–55Google Scholar
  23. Schulze FE (1907b) Die Xenophyophoren. Bull Mus Comp Zool Harv 51:143–162Google Scholar
  24. Tendal OS (1972) A monograph of the Xenophyophoria (Rhizopoda, Protozoa). Galathea Rep 12:7–99Google Scholar
  25. Tendal OS (1975) A new xenophyophore, living on solid substratum, and its significance. Deep-Sea Res I 22:45–48Google Scholar
  26. Tendal OS (1973) Xenophyophoria (Protozoa, Rhizopoda) from the collections of the R/V Vitiaz. Zool Zh 52:25–30Google Scholar
  27. Tendal OS (1994) Protozoa Xenophyophorea Granuloreticulosa: Psammina zonaria sp.nov. from the Wester Pacific and some aspects of the growth of xenophyophores. In: A. Crosnier (ed.). Resultats des Campagnes MUSORSTOM. Vol. 12. Mém. Mus. Nat. Hist. 161: 49–54Google Scholar
  28. Tendal OS (1996) Synoptic checklist and bibliography of the Xenophyophorea (Protista), with a zoogeographical survey of the group. Galathea Rep 17:79–101Google Scholar
  29. Tendal OS, Lewis KB (1978) New Zealand xenophyophores: upper bathyal distribution, photographs of growth position, and a new species. NZ J Mar Freshw Res 12:197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Veillette J, Sarrazin J, Gooday AJ, Galéron J, Caprais J-C, Vangriesheim A, Juniper SK (2007) Ferromanganese nodule fauna in the equatorial north Pacific ocean: species richness, faunal cover and spatial distribution. Deep-Sea Res I 54:1912–1935CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. E. Kamenskaya
    • 1
  • A. J. Gooday
    • 2
  • O. S. Tendal
    • 3
  • V. F. Melnik
    • 4
  1. 1.P.P.Shirshov Institute of Oceanology RASMoscowRussia
  2. 2.National Oceanography CentreUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  3. 3.State Natural History Museum of Denmark (Zoological Museum)University of CopenhagenCopenhagen ODenmark
  4. 4.Yuzhmorgeologiya State Scientific CentreGelendzhikRussia

Personalised recommendations