Advertisement

Marine Biodiversity

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 443–451 | Cite as

Spondylus crassisquama Lamarck, 1819 as a microecosystem and the effects of associated macrofauna on its shell integrity: isles of biodiversity or sleeping with the enemy?

  • Annika K. MackensenEmail author
  • Thomas Brey
  • Christian Bock
  • Soledad Luna
Original Paper

Abstract

In May 2009, we studied the bivalve Spondylus crassisquama and its relevance for macrobenthic biodiversity off the north Ecuadorian coast. We found that the large and heavy shells offer an exclusive substrate for numerous epibiont species and highly specialized carbonate-drilling endobiont species (71 species in total), which is a distinctly different and much more diverse habitat than the surrounding sandy bottoms (13 species, 4 of them found in both habitats). This is reflected by a Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index of 0.88. We discuss in detail the live habits of all 9 species of drilling endobionts that we found, and conclude that these can be seen as true mutualists, with the exception of boring sipunculids and bivalves. To further illustrate this complex co-existence, we visualize and quantify for the first time the tremendous effects of boring organisms on the shell structure of S. crassisquama by means of magnetic resonance imaging and a video appendix is provided.

Keywords

Spondylus crassisquama Ecuador Habitat complexity Macrofauna Boring organisms Nuclear magnetic resonance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was made possible by a full Ph.D. scholarship for A. Mackensen provided by the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation (RLS), Germany. We thank Kate Clark, Anna Fricke, Bill Rudman, Ángel Valdés and Nadya Sanamyan for help during the identification process and Paulina Guarderas, Robert Lamb and Dirk Riebensahm for their assistance in the sampling dives. Stjepko Golubic and two unknown reviewers helped improving the manuscript. The Ecuadorian Ministry of Environment provided the permits for the collection of Spondylus individuals under No. 028 IC-FAU-DNBAPVS/MA and 015-09 IC-FAU-DNB/MA.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

ESM 1

(MP4 676 kb)

References

  1. Airoldi L, Balata D, Beck M (2008) The gray zone: relationships between habitat loss and marine diversity and their applications in conservation. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 366:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansell AD, Nair NB (1969) A comparative study of bivalves which bore mainly by mechanical means. Am Zool 9:857–868Google Scholar
  3. Aviles F, Rozbaczylo N, Herve M, Godoy M (2007) First report of Polychaetes from the genus Oriopsis (Polychaeta: Sabellidae) associated with the Japanese abalone Haliotis discus hannai and other native molluscs in Chile. J Shellfish Res 26:863–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bamber R (1990) The effects of acidic seawater on 3 species of lamellibranch mollusk. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 143:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berge JA, Bjerkeng B, Pettersen O, Schaanning MT, Oxnevad S (2006) Effects of increased sea water concentrations of CO2 on growth of the bivalve Mytilus edulis L. Chemosphere 62:681–687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloom S (1975) Motile escape response of a sessile prey - sponge-scallop mutualism. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 17:311–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buschbaum C, Buschbaum G, Schrey I, Thieltges DW (2007) Shell-boring polychaetes affect gastropod shell strength and crab predation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 329:123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlson Jones D (2003) Bivalve Epibiont Armor: The Evolution of an Antipredatory Strategy. Dissertation, University of CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  9. Castro-Aguirre JL, García-Domínguez F, Balart EF (1996) Nuevos hospederos y datos morfométricos de Encheliophis dubius (Ophidiiformes: Carapidae) en el Golfo de California, México. Rev Biol Trop 44:753–756Google Scholar
  10. Cobb W (1969) Penetration of calcium carbonate substrates by the boring sponge, Cliona. Am Zool 9:783–790Google Scholar
  11. Davies PJ, Hutchings PA (1983) Initial colonization, erosion and accretion of coral substrate. Coral Reefs 2:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de León-González JA (1988) Mooreonuphis bajacalifornica, a new onuphid (Polychaeta: Onuphidae) epizoic on the thorny oyster, Spondylus princeps unicolor. Rev Biol Trop 36:433–436Google Scholar
  13. de León-González JA, Leija Tristán A, Salazar-Vallejo SI (1993) Epifauna del ostión espinoso Spondylus princeps unicolor (Mollusca: Bivalvia), de Puerto Escondido, Golfo de California, México. Rev Biol Trop 41:877–881Google Scholar
  14. Duffy JE (2006) Biodiversity and the functioning of seagrass ecosystems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 311:233–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evans JW (1969) Borers in the Shell of the Sea Scallop, Placopecten magellanicus. Am Zool 9:775–782Google Scholar
  16. Feifarek BP (1987) Spines and epibionts as antipredator defenses in the thorny oyster Spondylus americanus Hermann. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 105:39–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forester AJ (1979) Association between the sponge Halichondria panicea (Pallas) and scallop Chlamys varia (L.): a commensal-protective mutualism. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 36:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gazeau F, Quiblier C, Jansen JM, Gattuso J-P, Middelburg JJ, Heip CHR (2007) Impact of elevated CO2 on shellfish calcification. Geophys Res Lett 34:L07603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graham MH (2004) Effects of local deforestation on the diversity and structure of Southern California giant kelp forest food webs. Ecosystems 7:341–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haigler S (1969) Boring mechanism of Polydora websteri inhabiting Crassostrea virginica. Am Zool 9:821–828Google Scholar
  21. Handley S, Bergquist P (1997) Spionid polychaete infestations of intertidal Pacific Oysters Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg), Mahurangi Harbour, Northern New Zealand. Aquaculture 153:191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huber M (2009) Name Changes for two well-known Panamic Spondylids. Festivus 41:103–109Google Scholar
  23. Hutchings P, Kiene W, Cunningham R, Donnelly C (1992) Spatial and temporal patterns of non-colonial boring organisms (Polychaetes, Sipunculans and Bivalve Molluscs) in Porites at Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 11:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kiene W, Hutchings P (1994) Bioerosion experiments at Lizard-Island, Great-Barrier-Reef. Coral Reefs 13:91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kleemann K (1996) Biocorrosion by Bivalves. Pubbl St Zool Napoli Mar Ecol 17:145–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laihonen P, Furman E (1986) The site of settlement indicates commensalism between Bluemussel and its Epibiont. Oecologia 71:38–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lamprell K (2006) Spiny oysters: a revision of the living Spondylus species of the world. Lamprell, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  28. Lazar B, Loya Y (1991) Bioerosion of coral reefs - a chemical approach. Limnol Oceanogr 36:377–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Linero-Arana I, Diaz-Diaz O (2006) Poliquetos (Annelida: Polychaeta) epibiontes de Spondylus americanus (Bivalvia: Spondylidae) en el Parque Nacional Mochima, Venezuela. Rev Biol Trop 54:765–772PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Logan A (1974) Morphology and life habits of the recent cementing Bivalve Spondylus americanus Hermann from the Bermuda Platform. Bull Mar Sci 24:568–594Google Scholar
  31. MacGeachy JK, Stearn CW (1976) Boring by Macro-organisms in the Coral Montastrea annularis on Barbados Reefs. Int Rev Gesamten Hydrobiol Hydrogr 61:715–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mackensen AK, Brey T, Sonnenholzner S (2011) The fate of Spondylus stocks (Bivalvia: Spondylidae) in Ecuador: is recovery likely? J Shellfish Res 30:115–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Michaelidis B, Ouzounis C, Paleras A, Portner H (2005) Effects of long-term moderate hypercapnia on acid-base balance and growth rate in marine mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 293:109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mienis HK (2001) Blister pearl formation in Spondylus and Tridacna caused by boring organisms. Triton 3:9Google Scholar
  35. Moreno RA, Neill PE, Rozbaczylo N (2006) Native and non-indigenous boring polychaetes in Chile: a threat to native and commercial mollusc species. Rev Chil Hist Nat 79:263–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oakes FR, Fields RC (1996) Infestation of Haliotis rufescens shells by a sabellid polychaete. Aquaculture 140:139–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Palmer AR (1992) Calcification in marine molluscs: how costly is it? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:1379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pari N, Peyrot-Clausade M, Le Campion-Alsumard T, Hutchings PA, Chazottes V, Golubic S, Le Campion J, Fontaine M (1998) Bioerosion of experimental substrates on high islands and on atoll lagoons (French Polynesia) after two years of exposure. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 166:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pari N, Peyrot-Clausade M, Hutchings PA (2002) Bioerosion of experimental substrates on high islands and atoll lagoons (French Polynesia) during 5 years of exposure. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 276:109–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Peyrot-Clausade M, Chazottes V, Pari N (1999) Bioerosion in the carbonate budget of two Indo-Pacific reefs: La Reunion (Indian Ocean) and Moorea (Pacific Ocean). Bull Geol Soc Den 45:151–155Google Scholar
  41. Reaka-Kudla ML, Feingold JS, Glynn W (1996) Experimental studies of rapid bioerosion of coral reefs in the Galapagos Islands. Coral Reefs 15:101–107Google Scholar
  42. Rice ME (1969) Possible boring structures of sipunculids. Am Zool 9:803–812Google Scholar
  43. Rützler K, Rieger G (1973) Sponge burrowing: fine structure of Cliona lampa penetrating Calcareous Substrata. Mar Biol 21:144–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sammarco PW, Risk MJ (1990) Large-Scale Patterns in internal Bioerosion of Porites - Cross Continental-Shelf Trends on the Great Barrier-Reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 59:145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Savazzi E (2005) The function and evolution of lateral asymmetry in boring endolithic bivalves. Paleontol Res 9:169–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scott PJB (1988) Distribution, habitat and morphology of the Caribbean coral-boring and rock-boring Bivalve, Lithophaga bisulcata (Dorbigny) (Mytilidae, Lithophaginae). J Molluscan Stud 54:83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Skoglund C, Mulliner DK (1996) The Genus Spondylus (Bivalvia: Spondylidae) of the Panamic Province. Festivus 28:93–107Google Scholar
  48. Stone HMI (1998) On predator deterrence by pronounced shell ornament in epifaunal bivalves. Paleontology 41:1051–1068Google Scholar
  49. Tribollet A, Golubic S (2005) Cross-shelf differences in the pattern and pace of bioerosion of experimental carbonate substrates exposed for 3 years on the northern Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Coral Reefs 24:422–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tribollet A, Decherf G, Hutchings PA, Peyrot-Clausade M (2002) Large-scale spatial variability in bioerosion of experimental coral substrates on the Great Barrier Reef (Australia): importance of microborers. Coral Reefs 21:424–432Google Scholar
  51. Tribollet A, Godinot C, Atkinson M, Langdon (2009) Effects of elevated pCO2 on dissolution of coral carbonates by microbial euendoliths. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 23:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vance R (1978) Mutualistic Interaction between a sessile marine Clam and its Epibionts. Ecology 59:679–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Verbruggen H, Tribollet A (2011) Boring algae. Curr Biol 21:R876–R877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wahl M (1989) Marine Epibiosis. I. Fouling and Antifouling - some basic Aspects. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 58:175–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Warme JE, Marshall NF (1969) Marine borers in calcareous terrigenous rocks of the Pacific Coast. Am Zool 9:765–774Google Scholar
  56. Wielgus J, Glassom D, Chadwick NE (2006) Patterns of polychaete worm infestation of stony corals in the northern Red Sea and relationships to water chemistry. Bull Mar Sci 78:377–388Google Scholar
  57. Yonge C (1955) Adaptation to rock boring in Botula and Lithophaga (Lamellibranchia, Mytilidae) with a discussion on the evolution of this habit. J Cell Sci 3:383–410Google Scholar
  58. Zavarei A (1973) Monographie des Spondylidae (Lamellibranches) actuels et fossiles. Dissertation, University of ParisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung and Springer 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annika K. Mackensen
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Thomas Brey
    • 1
  • Christian Bock
    • 1
  • Soledad Luna
    • 2
  1. 1.Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine ResearchBremerhavenGermany
  2. 2.Nazca Institute for Marine ResearchQuitoEcuador

Personalised recommendations