Marine Biodiversity

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 291–302 | Cite as

Mapping the benthos: spatial patterns of seabed-dwelling megafauna in a Swedish Fjord, as derived from opportunistic video data

  • Genoveva Gonzalez-Mirelis
  • Per Bergström
  • Tomas Lundälv
  • Lisbeth Jonsson
  • Mats Lindegarth
Original Paper

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that mapping of benthic diversity is needed to aid in the management and conservation of marine ecosystems, but the choice of scale is contingent upon the patterns of spatial structure inherent to the benthos, which are often unknown. In this paper, spatial autocorrelation analysis is used to detect and describe fine-scale patterns of spatial structure in assemblages of epibenthic megafauna of the seabed below 20 m depth at the Koster fjord/archipelago area (Sweden). Presence/absence of benthic organisms was obtained from video images, which had been collected by means of a remotely operated vehicle. For sample sizes (grain) of <1 m2, and maximum between-sample distance (lag) of 200 m, rank-correlograms revealed the presence of patches in all 12 sites surveyed, and faunal homogeneity (positive spatial autocorrelation) was always detected within distances <20 m, though there was variation across sites in the sizes of patches. These findings were further used to resample the data at coarser grain sizes, to enable exploring of the faunal composition of the patches. We conclude that spatial autocorrelation analysis can greatly improve the design of sampling schemes by ensuring parsimoniousness, and maximizing the chances of detecting patterns. The procedure shown here is especially well suited to carry out subsequent mapping because it can readily discriminate between types of biotopes.

Keywords

Spatial structure Spatial autocorrelation analysis Epibenthic megafauna Underwater video Mapping 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by Naturvårdsverket’s project Korterhavet, and FORMAS through contract 217-2006-357 to M. Lindegarth. Many thanks to Per Nilsson for his useful comments, and to Andy Hennell for writing and re-writing many MATLAB scripts.

References

  1. Andrew NL, Mapstone BD (1987) Sampling and the description of spatial pattern in marine ecology. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 25:39–90Google Scholar
  2. Angel HH, Angel MV (1967) Distribution pattern analysis in a marine benthic community. Helgo wiss Meersunters 15:445–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown C, Cooper K, Meadows W, Limpenny D, Rees H (2002) Small-scale mapping of sea-bed assemblages in the Eastern English Channel using sidescan sonar and remote sampling techniques. Estuar Coast Shelf S 54:263–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown C, Hewer A, Meadows W, Limpenny D, Cooper K, Rees H (2004) Mapping seabed biotopes at Hastings Shingle Bank, eastern English Channel. Part 1. Assessment using sidescan sonar. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 84:481–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butman CA (1987) Larval settlement of soft-sediment invertebrates: the spatial scales of pattern explained by active habitat selection and the merging role of hydrodynamical processes. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 25:113–165Google Scholar
  6. Clarke KR, Somerfield PJ, Gorley RN (2008) Testing of null hypotheses in exploratory community analyses: similarity profiles and biota-environment linkage. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 366:56–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diniz-Filho JAF, Telles MPDC (2002) Spatial autocorrelation analysis and the identification of operational units for conservation in continuous populations. Conserv Biol 16:924–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dormann CF, McPherson JM, Araújo MB, Bivand R, Bolliger J, Carl G, Davies RG, Hirzel A, Jetz W, Kissling WD, Kühn I, Ohlemüller R, Peres-Neto PR, Reineking B, Schröder B, Schurr FM, Wilson R (2007) Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30:609–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dungan JL, Perry JN, Dale MRT, Legendre P, Citron-Pousty S, Fortin M-J, Jakomulska A, Miriti M, Rosenberg MS (2002) A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis. Ecography 25:626–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eastwood P, Souissi S, Rogers S, Coggan R, Brown C (2006) Mapping seabed assemblages using comparative top–down and bottom–up classificacion approaches. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63:1536–1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fortin MJ, Drapeau P, Legendre P (1989) Spatial autocorrelation and sampling design in plant ecology. Vegetatio 83:209–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fortin MJ, Dale MRT, ver Hoef J (2002) Spatial analysis in ecology. In: El-Shaarawi A, Piegorsch W (eds) Encyclopedia of environmetrics, vol 4. Wiley, Chichester, pp 2051–2058Google Scholar
  13. Galzin R, Legendre P (1987) The fish communities of a coral reef transect. Pac Sci 41:158–165Google Scholar
  14. García-Charton JA, Pérez-Ruzafa Á (2001) Spatial pattern and the habitat structure of a Mediterranean rocky reef fish local assemblage. Mar Biol 138:917–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greig-Smith P (1961) Data on pattern within plant communities. 1. The analysis of pattern. J Ecol 49:695–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. He F, Legendre P, Bellehumeur C, LaFrankie JV (1994) Diversity pattern and spatial scale: a study of a tropical rain forest of Malaysia. Environ Ecol Stat 1:265–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jennings S, Lancaster J, Woolmer A, Cotter J (1999) Distribution, diversity and abundance of epibenthic fauna in the North Sea. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 79:385–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson RG (1970) Variations in diversity within benthic marine communities. Am Nat 104(937):285–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kenkel NC, Juhsász P, Podani J (1989) On sampling procedures in population and community ecology. Vegetatio 83:195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kershaw KA (1957) The use of cover and frequency in the detection of pattern in plant communities. Ecology 38:291–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kostylev V, Todd B, Fader G, Courtney R, Cameron G, Pickrill R (2001) Benthic habitat mapping on the Scotian Shelf based on multibeam bathymetry, surficial geology and seafloor photographs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 219:121–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd English edn. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  23. Legendre P, Fortin MJ (1989) Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80:107–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levin S (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: the Robert H. McArthur award lecture. Ecology 73:1943–1967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Oden NL, Sokal RR (1986) Directional autocorrelation: an extension of spatial correlograms to two dimensions. Syst Zool 35:608–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. O’Niell RV, DeAngelis DL, Waide JB, Allen TFH (1986) A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  28. Parry D, Kendall M, Pilgrim D, Jones M (2003) Identification of patch structure within marine benthic landscapes using a remotely operated vehicle. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 285–286:497–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rhoads DC, Germano JD (1982) Characterization of organism-sediment relations using sediment profile imaging: an efficient method of remote ecological monitoring of the seafloor (Remots™ System). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 8:115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Segurado P, Araújo MB, Kunin WB (2006) Consequences of spatial autocorrelation for niched-based models. J Appl Ecol 43:433–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sokal RR, Oden NL (1978) Spatial autocorrelation in biology: 1. Methodology. Biol J Linn Soc 10:199–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Somerfield PJ, Gage JD (2000) Community structure of the benthos in Scottish Sea-lochs. IV. Multivariate spatial pattern. Mar Biol 136:1133–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Turner MG (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:171–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Underwood AJ, Chapman MG (1996) Scales of spatial patterns of distribution of intertidal invertebrates. Oecologia 107:212–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilkinson CD, Edds DR (2001) Spatial pattern and environmental correlates of a midwestern stream fish community: including spatial autocorrelation as a factor in community analysis. Am Midl Nat 146:271–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Senckenberg, Gesellschaft für Naturforschung and Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Genoveva Gonzalez-Mirelis
    • 1
  • Per Bergström
    • 1
  • Tomas Lundälv
    • 3
  • Lisbeth Jonsson
    • 1
  • Mats Lindegarth
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Marine Ecology, TjärnöUniversity of GothenburgStrömstadSweden
  2. 2.Department of Marine Ecology, TjärnöUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  3. 3.Sven Lovén Centre for Marine Sciences, TjärnöUniversity of GothenburgStrömstadSweden

Personalised recommendations