A picture is worth a thousand words: how images influence information quality and information load in online reviews

  • Robert Zinko
  • Paul Stolk
  • Zhan Furner
  • Brad AlmondEmail author
Research Paper


Decision science researchers have studied the influence of information overload extensively. Current electronic word of mouth (eWOM) research suggests that too much or too little information in a review can lead to decreased trust and purchase intent. This study adds to that paradigm by exploring the effects of images on uncertainty reduction in eWOM. More specifically, this study analyzes how images may influence trust and purchase intent based on an online review when there is too little or too much textual information. Findings indicate that when there is too little textual information, adding images increases trust and purchase intention, as information load increases. Likewise, when there is too much textual information, research suggests that consumers tend to skip over parts of the text. As such, images are still valuable, as they offer information that might have been missed in the text. These results suggest that when an improper amount of text is provided in a review, images may moderate the potential negative effects of that text length on trust and purchase intent.


Electronic word of mouth Information overload Information quality Images 

JEL classification




  1. Agnew, J. R., & Szykman, L. R. (2005). Asset allocation and informtion overload, the influence of information display, asset choice, and investor experience. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 6(2), 57–70.Google Scholar
  2. Anuwichanont, J., & Rajabhat, S. D. (2011). The impact of price perception on customer loyalty in the airline context. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 9(9), 37–50.Google Scholar
  3. Bae, S., & Lee, T. (2011). Product type and consumers’ perception of online consumer reviews. Electronic Markets, 21(4), 255–266.Google Scholar
  4. Bart, Y., Shankar, V., Sultan, F., & Urban, G. L. (2005). Are the drivers and role of online trust the same for all web sites and consumers? A large-scale exploratory empirical study. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 133–152.Google Scholar
  5. Berger, J. (2014). Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 586–607.Google Scholar
  6. Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon. com's mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368.Google Scholar
  7. Bickart, B., & Schindler, R. M. (2001). Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 31–40.Google Scholar
  8. Brenner, S. (1999). On the public intimacy of the new order: Images of women in the popular Indonesian print media. Indonesia, (67), 13–37.Google Scholar
  9. Broilo, P. L., Espartel, L. B., & Basso, K. (2016). Pre-purchase information search: Too many sources to choose. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 10(3), 193–211.Google Scholar
  10. Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2156–2160.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, J., & Dibb, S. (2010). Consumer trust in the online retail context: Exploring the antecedents and consequences. Psychology & Marketing, 27(4), 323–346.Google Scholar
  12. Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2012). What drives consumers to spread electronic word of mouth in online consumer-opinion platforms. Decision Support Systems, 53(1), 218–225.Google Scholar
  13. Cheung, C. M., Lee, M. K., & Rabjohn, N. (2008). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet Research, 18(3), 229–247.Google Scholar
  14. Childers, T. L., & Houston, M. J. (1984). Conditions for a picture-superiority effect on consumer memory. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(2), 643–654.Google Scholar
  15. Chu, R. K., & Choi, T. (2000). An importance-performance analysis of hotel selection factors in the Hong Kong hotel industry: A comparison of business and leisure travellers. Tourism Management, 21(4), 363–377.Google Scholar
  16. Chua, A. Y., & Banerjee, S. (2015). Analyzing users’ trust for online health rumors. Paper presented at the International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries.Google Scholar
  17. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.Google Scholar
  18. Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11, 355–366.Google Scholar
  19. Darby, M. R., & Karni, E. (1973). Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. The Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1), 67–88.Google Scholar
  20. Daugherty, T., & Hoffman, E. (2014). eWOM and the importance of capturing consumer attention within social media. Journal of Marketing Communications, 20(1–2), 82–102.Google Scholar
  21. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.Google Scholar
  22. Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1999). Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media synchronicity. Paper presented at the systems sciences, 1999. HICSS-32. Proceedings of the 32nd annual Hawaii international conference on.Google Scholar
  23. Edmunds, A., & Morris, A. (2000). The problem of information overload in business organisations: A review of the literature. International Journal of Information Management, 20(1), 17–28.Google Scholar
  24. Eppler, M. J., & Mengis, J. (2004). The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. The Information Society, 20(5), 325–344.Google Scholar
  25. Erkan, I., & Evans, C. (2016). The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers’ purchase intentions: An extended approach to information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 47–55.Google Scholar
  26. Fan, Y. W., & Miao, Y. F. (2012). Effect of electronic word-of-mouth on consumer purchase intention: The perspective of gender differences. International Journal of Electronic BusinessManagement, 10(3), 175–186.Google Scholar
  27. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1996). Blending as a central process of grammar. Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, 113, 130.Google Scholar
  28. Fazio, R. H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition & Emotion, 15(2), 115–141.Google Scholar
  29. Frenzen, J., & Nakamoto, K. (1993). Structure, cooperation, and the flow of market information. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 360–375.Google Scholar
  30. Furner, C. P., & Zinko, R. (2015). The influence of information overload on the development of trust and purchase intention based on online product reviews in a mobile vs. web environment: An empirical investigation. Electronic Markets, 1–14.Google Scholar
  31. Furner, C. P., & Zinko, R. (2017). The influence of information overload on the development of trust and purchase intention based on online product reviews in a mobile vs. web environment: An empirical investigation. Electronic Markets, 27(3), 211–224.Google Scholar
  32. Furner, C. P., & Zinko, R. (2018). Willingness to pay and disposition toward paying for apps: The influence of application reviews. International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications (IJESMA), 10(1), 13–33.Google Scholar
  33. Furner, C. P., Racherla, P., & Zhu, Z. (2012). Uncertinty, trust and purchase intention based on online product reviews: An introduction to a multinational study. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organizations, 11(3–4), 260–276.Google Scholar
  34. Furner, C. P., Zinko, R., & Zhu, Z. (2016). Electronic word-of-mouth and information overload in an experiential service industry. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 26(6), 788–810.Google Scholar
  35. Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692–705.Google Scholar
  36. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-commerce and the importance of social presence: Experiments in e-products and e-services. Omega, 32(6), 407–424.Google Scholar
  37. Gerrig, R. J., Zimbardo, P. G., Campbell, A. J., Cumming, S. R., & Wilkes, F. J. (2011). Psychology and life. Boston: Pearson Higher Education AU.Google Scholar
  38. Giordano, G., & Furner, C. P. (2009). Individual determinants of media choice for deception. 12 (1), 30-51. Journal of Information Technology Management, 12(1), 30–51.Google Scholar
  39. Grabe, S., Ward, L. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2008). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 460–474.Google Scholar
  40. Hassanein, K., Head, M., & Ju, C. (2009). A cross-cultural comparison of the impact of social presence on website trust, usefulness and enjoyment. International Journal of Electronic Business, 7(6), 625.Google Scholar
  41. Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 400–407.Google Scholar
  42. Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (1985). Structuring computer-mediated communication systems to avoid information overload. Communications of the ACM, 28(7), 680–689.Google Scholar
  43. Hoffman, E., & Daugherty, T. (2013). Is a picture always worth a thousand words? Attention to structural elements of ewom for consumer brands within social media. Advances in Consumer Research Volume, 41(41), 326–331.Google Scholar
  44. Hopkins, R. L. (1995). Countering information overload: The role of the librarian. The Reference Librarian, 23(49–50), 305–333.Google Scholar
  45. Hui, K. L., Teo, H. H., & Lee, S.-Y. T. (2007). The value of privacy assurance: An exploratory field experiment. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 19–33.Google Scholar
  46. Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.Google Scholar
  47. Jacoby, J., Speller, D. E., & Berning, C. K. (1974). Brand choice behavior as a function of information load: Replication and extension. Journal of Consumer Research, 1(1), 33–42.Google Scholar
  48. Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1989). The effect of task demands and graphical format on information processing strategies. Management Science, 35(3), 285–303.Google Scholar
  49. Jeong, E., & Jang, S. S. (2011). Restaurant experiences triggering positive electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) motivations. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(2), 356–366.Google Scholar
  50. Jones, Q., Ravid, G., & Rafaeli, S. (2004). Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Information Systems Research, 15(2), 194–210.Google Scholar
  51. Keith, M., Babb, J. S., Furner, C. P., Abdullat, A., & Lowrey, P. (2016). Limited information and quick decisions: Consumer privacy Calculus for Mobile applications. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(3), 88–130.Google Scholar
  52. Keller, K. L., & Staelin, R. (1987). Effects of quality and quantity of information on decision effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(2), 200–213.Google Scholar
  53. Khammash, M., & Griffiths, G. H. (2011). ‘Arrivederci CIAO. com, Buongiorno Bing. com’—Electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM), antecedences and consequences. International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 82–87.Google Scholar
  54. King, R. A., Racherla, P., & Bush, V. D. (2014). What we know and don't know about online word-of-mouth: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(3), 167–183.Google Scholar
  55. Laran, J., Janiszewski, C., & Salerno, A. (2016). Exploring the differences between conscious and unconscious goal pursuit. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(3), 442–458.Google Scholar
  56. Lee, J., Lee, J. N., & Shin, H. (2011). The long tail or the short tail: The category-specific impact of eWOM on sales distribution. Decision Support Systems, 51(3), 466–479.Google Scholar
  57. Lee, A. R., Son, S. M., & Kim, K. K. (2016). Information and communication technology overload and social networking service fatigue: A stress perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 51–61.Google Scholar
  58. Lipshitz, R., & Strauss, O. (1997). Coping with uncertainty: A naturalistic decision-making analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 149–163.Google Scholar
  59. Liu, Z., & Park, S. (2015). What makes a useful online review? Implication for travel product websites. Tourism Management, 47, 140–151.Google Scholar
  60. Liu, Y., Ferris, G. R., Zinko, R., Perrewé, P. L., Weitz, B., & Xu, J. (2007). Dispositional antecedents and outcomes of political skill in organizations: A four-study investigation with convergence. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71(1), 146–165.Google Scholar
  61. Liu, S.-H., Liao, H. L., & Chen, C.-H. (2013). Marketing for remote area using an experience-based tourism website destination. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 19(4–6), 294–303.Google Scholar
  62. Luo, L., & Toubia, O. (2015). Improving online idea generation platforms and customizing the task structure on the basis of consumers' domain-specific knowledge. Journal of Marketing, 79(5), 100–114.Google Scholar
  63. Lurie, N. H. (2004). Decision making in information-rich environments: The role of information structure. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(4), 473–486.Google Scholar
  64. Markin, R. J., & Narayana, C. L. (1976). Behavior control: Are consumers beyond freedom and dignity? ACR North American Advances, 3, 222–228.Google Scholar
  65. Mauri, A. G., & Minazzi, R. (2013). Web reviews influence on expectations and purchasing intentions of hotel potential customers. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 34, 99–107.Google Scholar
  66. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56–63.Google Scholar
  67. Moriarty, S. E. (1987). A content analysis of visuals used in print media advertising. Journalism Quarterly, 64(2–3), 550–554.Google Scholar
  68. Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). What makes a helpful review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon. com. MIS Quarterly, 34, 185–200.Google Scholar
  69. Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311–329.Google Scholar
  70. Nelson, P. (1974). Advertising as information. Journal of Political Economy, 82(4), 729–754.Google Scholar
  71. O'Connor, P. (2010). Managing a hotel's image on TripAdvisor. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 19(7), 754–772.Google Scholar
  72. Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2001). Implicit attitude formation through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 12(5), 413–417.Google Scholar
  73. Orcutt, J. D., & Turner, J. B. (1993). Shocking numbers and graphic accounts: Quantified images of drug problems in the print media. Social Problems, 40(2), 190–206.Google Scholar
  74. Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgment and Decision making, 5(5), 411–419.Google Scholar
  75. Park, J., Lennon, S. J., & Stoel, L. (2005). On-line product presentation: Effects on mood, perceived risk, and purchase intention. Psychology & Marketing, 22(9), 695–719.Google Scholar
  76. Potts, C. (1995). Using schematic scenarios to understand user needs. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 1st conference on designing interactive systems: Processes, practices, methods, & techniques.Google Scholar
  77. Roggeveen, A. L., Grewal, D., Townsend, C., & Krishnan, R. (2015). The impact of dynamic presentation format on consumer preferences for hedonic products and services. Journal of Marketing, 79(6), 34–49.Google Scholar
  78. Scott, L. M. (1994). Images in advertising: The need for a theory of visual rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 252–273.Google Scholar
  79. Singh, S. N., Lessig, V. P., Kim, D., Gupta, R., & Hocutt, M. A. (2000). Does your ad have too many pictures? Journal of Advertising Research, 40(1–2), 11–27.Google Scholar
  80. Skow, L. M., & Dionisopoulos, G. N. (1997). A struggle to contextualize photographic images: American print media and the “burning monk”. Communication Quarterly, 45(4), 393–409.Google Scholar
  81. Skyrius, R. (2014). The Split of information needs support between the users and information technology. Paper presented at the DSS.Google Scholar
  82. Sotiriadis, M. D., & Van Zyl, C. (2013). Electronic word-of-mouth and online reviews in tourism services: The use of twitter by tourists. Electronic Commerce Research, 13(1), 103–124.Google Scholar
  83. Statista. (2017). Online vs. in-store shopping preferences of consumers in the United States as of February 2017, By product category. Key Figures in Electronic Commerce Retrieved from Accessed Aug 2018.
  84. Steffes, E. M., & Burgee, L. E. (2009). Social ties and online word of mouth. Internet Research, 19(1), 42–59.Google Scholar
  85. Stern, B. B. (1990). Other-speak: Classical allegory and contemporary advertising. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 14–26.Google Scholar
  86. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Osterlind, S. J. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  87. Till, B. D., & Busler, M. (2000). The match-up hypothesis: Physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent and brand beliefs. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 1–13.Google Scholar
  88. Unnava, H. R., & Burnkrant, R. E. (1991). An imagery-processing view of the role of pictures in print advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(2), 226–231.Google Scholar
  89. Wan, Y. (2015). The Matthew effect in social commerce. Electronic Markets, 25(4), 313–324.Google Scholar
  90. Wan, Y., Nakayama, M., & Sutcliffe, N. (2012). The impact of age and shopping experiences on the classification of search, experience, and credence goods in online shopping. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 10(1), 135–148.Google Scholar
  91. Wang, K., & Lin, C. L. (2012). The adoption of mobile value-added services: Investigating the influence of IS quality and perceived playfulness. Managing Service Quality, 22(2), 184–208.Google Scholar
  92. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  93. Weinert, C., Maier, C., Laumer, S., & Weitzel, T. (2014). Does teleworking negatively influence IT professionals?: an empirical analysis of IT personnel's telework-enabled stress. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 52nd ACM conference on computers and people research.Google Scholar
  94. Wu, P. C., & Wang, Y.-C. (2011). The influences of electronic word-of-mouth message appeal and message source credibility on brand attitude. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 23(4), 448–472.Google Scholar
  95. Yoon, S., & Kim, H. C. (2016). Keeping the American dream alive: The interactive effect of perceived economic mobility and materialism on impulsive spending. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(5), 759–772.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Applied Informatics at University of Leipzig 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Zinko
    • 1
  • Paul Stolk
    • 2
  • Zhan Furner
    • 3
  • Brad Almond
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Business Administration, Management & Marketing DepartmentTexas A&M University-Central TexasKilleenUSA
  2. 2.Newcastle Business School, Faculty of Business and LawUniversity DrCallaghanAustralia
  3. 3.College of Business, Department of AccountingEast Carolina UniversityGreenvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations