Advertisement

Software tools for business model innovation: current state and future challenges

  • Daniel SzopinskiEmail author
  • Thorsten Schoormann
  • Thomas John
  • Ralf Knackstedt
  • Dennis Kundisch
Research Paper
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Special Issue on "Business model innovation: Tools and Innovation patterns"

Abstract

Software tools for business model development hold great promise for supporting business model innovation, but nonetheless, virtually no design-relevant knowledge exists concerning the functions that such tools should possess. As a result, practitioners lack guidance for choosing software tools, and researchers lack a foundation for advancing knowledge on these tools in a cumulative way. To address these issues, we synthesize knowledge from research on software tools for business model development and adjacent fields with the results of an analysis of 24 software tools from practice. Our contribution is threefold. First, we provide a comprehensive taxonomy that identifies 43 characteristic functions of software-based business model development tools. Second, we provide a classification of existing software tools for the taxonomy and, on this basis, third, we derive an agenda for future research. We thus support practitioners’ decision making on tool (re-)design and investment, and provide the foundation for a cumulative stream of research on software tools for business model development.

Keywords

Business model Business model development tool Business model innovation Taxonomy Research agenda 

JEL classification

O3 L86 M15 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the Collaborative Research Center “On-The-Fly Computing” (CRC 901, project number 160364472SFB901) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) within the research project “SmartHybrid – Process Engineering” (ZW 6-85003451).

References

  1. Adner, R., Csaszar, F. A., & Zemsky, P. B. (2014). Positioning on a multiattribute landscape. Management Science, 60(11), 2794–2815.Google Scholar
  2. Akkermans, H., & Gordijn, J. (2003). Value-based requirements engineering: Exploring innovative e-commerce ideas. Requirements Engineering, 8(2), 114–134.Google Scholar
  3. Al-Debei, M. M., & Avison, D. (2010). Developing a unified framework of the business model concept. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(3), 359–376.Google Scholar
  4. Alt, R., & Zimmermann, H.-D. (2014). Status of business model and electronic market research: An interview with Alexander Osterwalder. Electronic Markets, 24(4), 243–249.Google Scholar
  5. Althuizen, N., & Reichel, A. (2016). The effects of IT-enabled cognitive stimulation tools on creative problem solving: A dual pathway to creativity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(1), 11–44.Google Scholar
  6. Balijepally, V., Mangalaraj, G., & Iyengar, K. (2011). Are we wielding this hammer correctly? A reflective review of the application of cluster analysis in information systems research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(5), 375–413.Google Scholar
  7. Blackstock, M., & Lea, R. (2013). Toward interoperability in a web of things. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiIComp2013). Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  8. Blank, S. (2013). Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 63–72.Google Scholar
  9. Boose, J. H., & Gaines, B. R. (1990). Knowledge acquisition for knowledge-based systems: Notes on the state-of-the-art. In Knowledge acquisition: Selected research and commentary. Boston. Massachusetts, USA: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Bouwman, H., Heikkilä, J., Heikkilä, M., Leopold, C., & Haaker, T. (2017). Achieving agility using business model stress testing. Electronic Markets, 28(2), 149–162.Google Scholar
  11. Bucherer, E., Eisert, U., & Gassmann, O. (2012). Towards systematic business model innovation: Lessons from product innovation management. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(2), 183–198.Google Scholar
  12. Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. E. (2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 195–215.Google Scholar
  13. Chasin, F., von Hoffen, M., Cramer, M., & Matzner, M. (2017). Peer-to-peer sharing and collaborative consumption platforms: A taxonomy and a reproducible analysis. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 11(4), 1–33.Google Scholar
  14. Cosenz, F., & Noto, G. (2018). A dynamic business modelling approach to design and experiment new business venture strategies. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 127–140.Google Scholar
  15. Cozzens, S. E., Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. (1989). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Technology and Culture, 30(3), 705–707.Google Scholar
  16. Czarnecki, K., & Helsen, S. (2006). Feature-based survey of model transformation approaches. IBM Systems Journal, 45(3), 621–645.Google Scholar
  17. Daas, D., Hurkmans, T., Overbeek, S., & Bouwman, H. (2013). Developing a decision support system for business model design. Electronic Markets, 23(3), 251–265.Google Scholar
  18. Dellermann, D., Lipusch, N., Ebel, P., Popp, K. M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2017). Finding the unicorn: Predicting early stage startup success through a hybrid intelligence method. In Proceedings of the 38 th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2017). Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar
  19. De Reuver, M., Bouwman, H., & Haaker, T. (2013). Business model roadmapping: A practical approach to come from an existing to a desired business model. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(01), 1–18.Google Scholar
  20. Ebel, P., Bretschneider, U., & Leimeister, J. M. (2016). Leveraging virtual business model innovation: A framework for designing business model development tools. Information Systems Journal, 26(5), 519–550.Google Scholar
  21. Eickhoff, M., Muntermann, J., & Weinrich, T. (2017). What do FinTechs actually do? A Taxonomy of FinTech business models. In Proceedings of the 38 th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2017). Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar
  22. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
  23. Eppler, M. J., Hoffmann, F., & Bresciani, S. (2011). New business models through collaborative idea generation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15(6), 1323–1341.Google Scholar
  24. Figl, K., & Recker, J. (2016). Exploring cognitive style and task-specific preferences for process representations. Requirements Engineering, 21(1), 63–85.Google Scholar
  25. Fritscher, B., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Supporting business model modelling: A compromise between creativity and constraints. In Lecture notes in computer science. Task models and diagrams for user interface design. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Fritscher, B., & Pigneur, Y. (2014a). Computer aided business model design: Analysis of key features adopted by users. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS2014). Waikoloa, Hawaii.Google Scholar
  27. Fritscher, B., & Pigneur, Y. (2014b). Visualizing business model evolution with the business model canvas: Concept and tool. In Proceedings of the 16th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics (CBI2014). Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  28. Gassmann, O., Frankenberger, K., & Csik, M. (2014). The business model navigator: 55 models that will revolutionise your business. Harlow, United Kingdom: Pearson.Google Scholar
  29. GE. (2014). Global Innovation Barometer 2014. Google Scholar
  30. Geiger, D., & Schader, M. (2014). Personalized task recommendation in crowdsourcing information systems – Current state of the art. Decision Support Systems, 65(September), 3–16.Google Scholar
  31. George, G., & Bock, A. J. (2011). The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 83–111.Google Scholar
  32. Gimpel, H., Rau, D., & Röglinger, M. (2017). Understanding FinTech start-ups – A taxonomy of consumer-oriented service offerings. Electronic Markets, 22(4), 1–20.Google Scholar
  33. Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H., & van Vliet, H. (2000). Business modelling is not process modelling. In Lecture notes in computer science. Conceptual modeling for e-business and the web. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611–642.Google Scholar
  35. Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 337–335.Google Scholar
  36. Haaker, T., Bouwman, H., Janssen, W., & De Reuver, M. (2017). Business model stress testing: A practical approach to test the robustness of a business model. Futures, 89, 14–25.Google Scholar
  37. Haas, P., Blohm, I., & Leimeister, J. M. (2014). An empirical taxonomy of crowdfunding intermediaries. In Proceedings of the 35 th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2014). New Zealand: Auckland.Google Scholar
  38. Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies. texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441–456.Google Scholar
  39. Jakobs, K. (2008). Standardization research in information technology: New perspectives. Advances in IT standards and standardization research series. Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  40. Jarzabkowski, P., & Kaplan, S. (2015). Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4), 537–558.Google Scholar
  41. John, T. (2016). Supporting Business Model Idea Generation Through Machine-generated Ideas: A Design Theory In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2016). Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
  42. John, T., Kundisch, D., Szopinski, D. (2017). Visual languages for modeling business models: A critical review and future research directions. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2017). Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar
  43. Kaplan, S. (2011). Strategy and PowerPoint: An inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making. Organization Science, 22(2), 320–346.Google Scholar
  44. Kawakami, T., Barczak, G., & Durmuşoğlu, S. S. (2015). Information technology tools in new product development: The impact of complementary resources. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(4), 622–635.Google Scholar
  45. Kettinger, W. J., Teng, J. T. C., & Guha, S. (1997). Business process change: A study of methodologies, techniques, and tools. MIS Quarterly, 21(1), 55.Google Scholar
  46. Kitchenham, B. A., Pfleeger, S. L., Pickard, L. M., Jones, P. W., Hoaglin, D. C., El Emam, K., & Rosenberg, J. (2002). Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28(8), 721–734.Google Scholar
  47. Labes, S., Erek, K., & Zarnekow, R. (2013). Common patterns of cloud business models. In Proceedings of the 19th Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS 2013). Chicago, Illinois, USA.Google Scholar
  48. Leopold, H., Mendling, J., & Polyvyanyy, A. (2014). Supporting process model validation through natural language generation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 40(8), 818–840.Google Scholar
  49. Lima, M., & Baudier, P. (2017). Business model canvas acceptance among French entrepreneurship students: Principles for enhancing innovation artefacts in business education. Journal of Innovation Economics, 23(2), 159.Google Scholar
  50. Lombardi, P., & Schwabe, F. (2017). Sharing economy as a new business model for energy storage systems. Applied Energy, 188, 485–496.Google Scholar
  51. Mannucci, P. V. (2017). Drawing snow white and animating buzz lightyear: Technological toolkit characteristics and creativity in cross-disciplinary teams. Organization Science, 28(4), 711–728.Google Scholar
  52. Martins, L. L., Rindova, V. P., & Greenbaum, B. E. (2015). Unlocking the hidden value of concepts: A cognitive approach to business model innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9(1), 99–117.Google Scholar
  53. Massa, L., Tucci, C., & Afuah, A. (2017). A critical assessment of business model research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 73–104.Google Scholar
  54. Mauerhoefer, T., Strese, S., & Brettel, M. (2017). The impact of information technology on new product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(6), 719–738.Google Scholar
  55. Moellers, T., Bansemir, B., Pretzl, M., & Gassmann O. (2017). Design and evaluation of a system dynamics based business model evaluation method. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and (DESRIST 2017). Karlsruhe, Germany, Design and Evaluation of a System Dynamics Based Business Model Evaluation Method.Google Scholar
  56. Nickerson, R. C., Varshney, U., & Muntermann, J. (2013). A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(3), 336–359.Google Scholar
  57. Nunamaker, J. F., Applegate, L. M., & Konsynski, B. R. (2015). Facilitating group creativity: Experience with a group decision support system. Journal of Management Information Systems, 3(4), 5–19.Google Scholar
  58. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken, New Jersey. USA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  59. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2013). Designing business models and similar strategic objects: The contribution of IS. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(5), 237–244.Google Scholar
  60. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present. and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
  61. Paper, D. (1997). The value of creativity in business process re-engineering. Business Process Management Journal, 3(3), 218–231.Google Scholar
  62. Peinel, G., Jarke, M., & Rose, T. (2010). Business models for eGovernment services. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 7(4), 380–401.Google Scholar
  63. Peters, C., Blohm, I., & Leimeister, J. M. (2015). Anatomy of successful business models for complex services: Insights from the telemedicine field. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(3), 75–104.Google Scholar
  64. Prat, N., Comyn-Wattiau, I., & Akoka, J. (2015). A taxonomy of evaluation methods for information systems artifacts. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(3), 229–267.Google Scholar
  65. Püschel, L., Röglinger, M., & Schlott, H. (2016). What’s in a smart thing? Development of a multi-layer taxonomy. In Proceedings of the 37 th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2016). Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
  66. Recker, J. (2012). “Modeling with tools is easier, believe me”: The effects of tool functionality on modeling grammar usage beliefs. Information Systems, 37(3), 213–226.Google Scholar
  67. Remane, G., Hanelt, A., Tesch, J. F., Nickerson, R. C., & Kolbe, L. M. (2016). A taxonomy of carsharing business models. In Proceedings of the 37 th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2016). Ireland: Dublin.Google Scholar
  68. Riemer, K., Holler, J., & Indulska, M. (2011). Collaborative process modelling – Tool analysis and design implications. In Proceedings of the 19 th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2011). Finland: Helsinki.Google Scholar
  69. Robson, R. (2000). Report on learning technology standards. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (EdMedia2000). Google Scholar
  70. Samavi, R., Yu, E., & Topaloglou, T. (2009). Strategic reasoning about business models: A conceptual modeling approach. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 7(2), 171–198.Google Scholar
  71. Schneider, S., & Spieth, P. (2013). Business model innovation: Towards an integrated future research agenda. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(01), 1–34.Google Scholar
  72. Schoormann, T., Behrens, D., Kolek, E., Knackstedt, R. (2016). Sustainability in business models: A literature-review-based design-science-oriented research agenda. In Proceedings of the 24th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2016). Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
  73. Schwaber, K., & Beedle, M. (2002). Agile software development with scrum. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. USA: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  74. Seidel, S., Müller-Wienbergen, F., & and Becker, J. (2010). The concept of creativity in the information systems discipline: Past, present, and prospects. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 27(14), 217–242.Google Scholar
  75. Spieth, P., Schneckenberg, D., & Ricart, J. E. (2014). Business model innovation: State of the art and future challenges for the field. R&D Management, 44(3), 237–247.Google Scholar
  76. Strategyzer. (2015). The business model canvas: Why and how organizations around the world adopt it (Strategyzer Field Report).Google Scholar
  77. Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194.Google Scholar
  78. Terrenghi, N., Schwarz, J., Legner, C., & Eisert, U. (2017). Business model management: Current practices, required activities and IT support. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI2017). Switzerland: St. Gallen.Google Scholar
  79. Titze, I. R. (1994). Toward standards in acoustic analysis of voice. NCVS Status and Progress Report, 271–280.Google Scholar
  80. Van Wessel, R. (2010). Toward corporate IT standardization management: Frameworks and solutions. Hershey. In Pennsylvania. USA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  81. Veit, D., Clemons, E., Benlian, A., Buxmann, P., Hess, T., Kundisch, D., Leimeister, J. M., Loos, P., & Spann, M. (2014). Business models: An information systems research agenda. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(1), 45–53.Google Scholar
  82. Vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Niehaves, B., Reimer, K., Plattfaut, R., & Cleven, A. (2009). Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. In Proceedings of the 17 th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2009). Italy: Verona.Google Scholar
  83. Vos, L. (2015). Simulation games in business and marketing education: How educators assess student learning from simulations. The International Journal of Management Education, 13(1), 57–74.Google Scholar
  84. Wand, Y., & Weber, R. (2002). Research commentary: Information systems and conceptual modeling: A research agenda. Information Systems Research, 13(4), 363–376.Google Scholar
  85. Wang, K., & Nickerson, J. V. (2017). A literature review on individual creativity support systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 139–151.Google Scholar
  86. Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236–244.Google Scholar
  87. Fritscher, B., & Pigneur, Y. (2014). Business model design: An evaluation of paper-based and computer-aided canvases. In Proceedings of the 4 th International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design (BMSD2014). Luxembourg, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  88. Zec, M., Dürr, P., Schneider, A. W., & Matthes, F. (2014). Improving computer-support for collaborative business model design and exploration. In Proceedings of the 4 th International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design (BMSD2014). Luxembourg, Luxembourg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Applied Informatics at University of Leipzig 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Paderborn UniversityPaderbornGermany
  2. 2.University of HildesheimHildesheimGermany

Personalised recommendations