Advertisement

Electronic Markets

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 55–66 | Cite as

The strategic mediator: a paradoxical role for a collaborative e-marketplace

  • Cecilia RossignoliEmail author
  • Andrea Carugati
  • Lapo Mola
General Research

Abstract

The last 10 years have witnessed the emergence of electronic marketplaces as players that leverage new technologies to facilitate B2B internet-mediated collaborative business. Nowadays these players are augmenting their services from simple intermediation to include new inter-organizational relationships. The interest of this paper is to investigate the shift in the role and evolution of services proposed by e-marketplaces in response to the demands of the market participants. We carried out a longitudinal qualitative field study of an e-marketplace providing the outsourcing of the procurement process. Through the study of services evolving over time we show that, as marketplaces support increasingly complex business processes, the market participants begin to privilege the well connected small number to the convenience of the openness to the entire market. The participants see the marketplace as an exclusive club, the belonging to which provides a strategic advantage. The technology brought forth by the marketplace participates in shaping the strategic demands of the participants which in turn request the marketplace to redesign its own strategy. Profiting from this unintended demand, the e-marketplace assumes the paradoxical role of a strategic mediator: an agent who upholds and heightens the fences of the transactions instead of leveling them. The results have implication in shaping how we see the role of technology as strategic or commoditized.

Keywords

Technology strategy E-marketplace Collaborative business process Electronic intermediation 

JEL Classification

L22 

References

  1. Agar, M. (1980). The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  2. Austin, D. A., Gravelle, J.G. (2008). Does price transparency improve market efficiency? Implications of empirical evidence in other markets for the health sector, CRS report for Congress, April 29, 2008.Google Scholar
  3. Bakos, J. Y. (1997). Reducing buyer search costs: Implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Science, 43(12), 1676–1692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakos, J. Y. (1998). The emerging role of electronic marketplaces on the Internet. Communication of the ACM, 41(8), 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bailey, J. P., & Bakos, J. Y. (1997). An exploratory study of the emerging role of electronic intermediaries. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 1(3), 7–20.Google Scholar
  6. Barley, S. R. (1990). Images of imaging: Notes on doing longitudinal field work. Organization Science, 1(1), 220–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benbasat, I. (1984). An analysis of research methodologies. In W. F. McFarlan (Ed.), The information systems research challenge (pp. 47–85). Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  8. Benjamin, R., & Wigand, R. (1995). Electronic markets and virtual value chains on the information superhighway. Sloan Management Review, 36, 62–72.Google Scholar
  9. Bhargava, H. K., & Choudhary, V. (2004). Economics of an information intermediary with aggregation benefits. Information Systems Research, 15, 22–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brynjolfsson, E., Malone, T. W., Gurbaxani, V., & Kabil, A. (1994). Does information technology lead to smaller firms? Management Science, 40(2), 1628–1644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carr, N. G. (2003). It doesn’t matter. Harvard Business Review, 81, 41–49.Google Scholar
  12. Campbell, D. T. (1975). “Degrees of freedom” and the case study. Comparative Political Studies, 8(2), 178–193.Google Scholar
  13. Ciborra, C. (1993). Teams, markets, and systems: business innovation and information technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Christiaanse, E., & Damsgaard, J. (2000). “Success and failure in building electronic infrastructures in the air cargo industry: A comparison of The Netherlands and Hong Kong SAR”, PrimaVera working paper 2000-29. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  15. Christiaanse, E., & Markus, L. (2003). Participation in collaboration electronic marketplaces. Hawaii, USA: Hawaii International Conference on System Science.Google Scholar
  16. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 16, 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Conway, D. G. (2000). Supplier affiliated extended supply chain backbones. Information Systems Frontiers, 2(1), 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Daniel, E. M., White, A., & Ward, J. M. (2004). Exploring the role of third parties in inter-organizational web service adoption. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 17(5), 351–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dikey, M. H., & Ives, B. (2000). The impact of intranet technology on power in franchisee/franchisor relationships. Information systems Frontiers, 2(1), 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. El Sawy, O. (2003). Collaborative integration in e-business through private trading exchanges (PTXs). Information Systems and e-Business Management, 1, 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fielt, E., Janssen, W., Faber, E. & Wagenaar, R. (2006). Towards a design theory for electronic intermediaries. In M. Tanniru, T-P. Liang, M. J. Shaw, D. Zeng, M. Chau & S-Y. Hwang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th workshop on e-business (WeB 2006), Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Fong, T., Fowler, D., & Swatman, P. M. C. (1998). Success and failure factors for implementing effective electronic markets. Electronic Markets, 8, 45–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ganesh, J., Madanmohan, T. R., Jose, P. D., & Seshadri, S. (2004). Adaptive strategies of firms in high-velocity environments: The case of B2B electronic marketplaces. Journal of Global Information Management, 12, 41–59.Google Scholar
  24. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  25. Grieger, M. (2003). Electronic marketplaces: A literature review and a call for supply chain management research. European Journal of Operational Research, 144, 280–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guo, J. (2007). Business-to-business electronic market place selection. Enterprise Information Systems, 1, 383–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gurbaxani, V., & Whang, S. (1991). The impact of information systems on organizations and markets. Communications of the ACM, 34, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamel, J., Dufour, S., & Fortin, D. (1993). Case study methods, vol. 32. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Holzmuller, H., & Schlichter, J. (2002). Delphi study about the future of B2B marketplace in Germany. in Electronic Commerce Research and Application, 1, 2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hopkins, J. L., & Kehoe, D. F. (2006). The theory and development of a relationship matrix based approach to evaluating e-marketplaces. Electronic Markets, 16, 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kalakota, R., & Konsynski, B. (2000). The rise of neo-intermediation: The transformation of the brokerage industry. Information Systems Frontiers, 2(1), 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kambil, A., & Van Heck, E. (1998). Reengineering the Dutch flower auctions: a framework for analyzing exchange organizations. Information Systems Research, 9(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kim, G. M., & Lee, G. S. (2003). E-Catalog evaluation criteria and their relative importance. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 34(4), 55–62.Google Scholar
  34. Klein, A., & Krcmar, H. (2006). DCXNET: E-transformation at DaimlerChrysler. Journal of information technology, 21(1), 52–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Laseter, T. M., & Bodily, S. E. (2004). Strategic indicators of B2B e-marketplace financial performance. Electronic Markets, 14, 322–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee, T. W. (1999). Using qualitative methods in organizational research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Lomuscio, A. R., Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (2003). A classification scheme for negotiation in electronic commerce. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12(1), 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MacDuffie, J. P., & Helper, S. (2003). B2B and mode or exchange: evolutionary and transformative effect. In B. Kogut (Ed.), The global internet economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  39. Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and organizational change: Casual structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5), 583–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Malone, T. W., Benjamin, R. I., & Yates, J. (1987). Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies: Effects of information technology on market structure and corporate strategies. Communications of the ACM, 30(6), 484–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, Bureaucracies and Clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. XXV, n.1.Google Scholar
  42. Picot, A., Bortenlaenger, C., & Roehrl, H. (1997). Organization of electronic markets: contributions from the new institutional economics. The Information Society, 13, 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 12, 295–336.Google Scholar
  44. Powell, W. W., & Grodal, S. (2005). Networks of innovators. The Oxford handbook of innovation pp. 56–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Philipps, C., & Meeker, M. (2000). The B2B Internet report: Collaborative commerce. New York: Morgan Stanley Dean Bitter Research.Google Scholar
  46. Soh, C., Markus, M. L., & Goh, K. H. (2006). Electronic marketplaces and price transparency: Strategy, information technology, and success. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 705–723.Google Scholar
  47. Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Tan, G. W., Shaw, M. J., & Fulkerson, B. (2000). Web-based supply chain management. Information Systems Frontiers, 2(1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Maanen, J. (1979). The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 539–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang, S., Archer, N. P., & Zheng, W. (2006). An exploratory study of electronic marketplace adoption: A multiple perspective view. Electronic Markets, 16, 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang, S., & Archer, N. P. (2007). Electronic marketplace definition and classification: Literature review and clarifications. Enterprise Information Systems, 1, 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang, S., Zheng, S., Xu, L., Li, D., & Meng, H. (2008). A literature review of electronic marketplace research: Themes, theories and an integrative framework. Information Systems Frontiers, 10, 555–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weill, P., & Vitale, M. R. (2001). Place to Space: Migrating to e-business models. Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  54. Wigand, R. T. (1996). Electronic commerce: definition, theory, and context. The Information Society, 13(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wigand, R. T. (1997). Electronic commerce. Definition, theory and context. The Information Society, 13, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wigand, R., Picot, A., & Reichwald, R. (1997). Information, organization and management. Chichester, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  57. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Market and hierarchies. Analysis and antitrust implication. New York: The Free.Google Scholar
  58. Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organizations: the transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 548–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research, design and methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Zhu, K. (2002). Information transparency in electronic marketplaces: Why data transparency may hinder the adoption of B2B exchanges. Electronic Markets, 12, 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhu, K. (2004). Information transparency of business-to-business electronic markets: A game-theoretic analysis. Management Science, 50, 670–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Information Management, University of St. Gallen 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cecilia Rossignoli
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andrea Carugati
    • 2
  • Lapo Mola
    • 1
  1. 1.University of VeronaVeronaItaly
  2. 2.Aarhus School of BusinessUniversity of AarhusAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations