Advertisement

Land-Use/Land-Cover Classification Using Elephant Herding Algorithm

  • J. JayanthEmail author
  • V. S. Shalini
  • T. Ashok Kumar
  • Shivaprakash Koliwad
Research Article

Abstract

In recent years, swarm intelligence algorithms such as particle swarm optimisation, ant colony optimisation, cuckoo search and artificial bee colony algorithm have shown promising results in multispectral image classification. Elephant herding algorithm is one of the newly emerging nature inspired algorithms which can analyse multispectral pixels and determine the information of class via fitness function. When the spectral resolution of the satellite imagery is increased, the higher within-class variability reduces the statistical separability between the LU/LC classes in spectral space and tends to continue diminishing classification accuracy of the traditional classifiers. These are mostly per pixel and parametric in nature. Experimental result has revealed that elephant herding algorithm shows an improvement of 10.7% on Arsikere taluk and 6.63% on NITK campus over support vector machine.

Keywords

Support vector machine (SVM) Elephant herding (EH) Multispectral (MS) image classification 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author graciously thanks Dr. Dwarkish G S Professor, Hydraulics Department, NITK, Mangalore, for providing the remote sensed data for this study.

References

  1. Bahmanyar, R., Shiyong, C., & Datcu, M. (2015). A comparative study of bag-of-words and bag-of-topics models of EO image patches. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 12(6), 1357–1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen, S., & Tian, Y. (2015). Pyramid of spatial relations for scene-level land use classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(4), 947–1957.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, X.-L., Zhao, H.-M., Li, P.-X., & Yin, Z.-Y. (2006). Remote sensing image-based analysis of the relationship between urban heat island and land use/cover changes. Remote Sensing of Environment, 104(2), 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fauvel, M., Benediktsson, J. A., Chanussot, J., & Sveinsson, J. R. (2008). Spectral and spatial classification of hyperspectral data using SVMs and morphological profiles. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46(11), 3804–3814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gu, Y., Liu, T., Jia, X., Benediktsson, J. A., & Chanussot, J. (2016). Nonlinear multiple kernel learning with multiple-structure-element extended morphological profiles for -hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(6), 3235–3247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hu, S., & Wang, L. (2013). Automated urban land-use classification with remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34(3), 790–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huang, X., Liu, H., & Zhang, L. (2016). Spatiotemporal detection and analysis of urban villages in mega city regions of China using high-resolution remotely sensed imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(7), 3639–3657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jayanth, J., Ashok Kumar, T., & Koliwad, S. (2012). Comparative analysis of image fusion techniques for remote sensing. In Hassanien, A. E., Salem, A. M., Ramadan, R., & Kim, T. (Eds.), Proceedings of communications in computer and information science international conference on advanced machine learning technologies and applications (AMLTA 2012) Cairo, December 8–10 (Vol. 322, pp. 111–117). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Jayanth, J., Koliwad, S., & Ashok Kumar, T. (2015). Classification of remote sensed data using Artificial Bee Colony algorithm. Egypt Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 19(1), 119–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2015.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Perronnin, F., Sãąnchez, J., Mensink, T. (2010). Improving the Fisher kernel for large-scale image classification. In European conference on computer vision (ECCV) (Vol. 6314, pp. 143–156). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Voltersen, M., Berger, C., Hese, S., & Schmullius, C. (2014). Object-based land cover mapping and comprehensive feature calculation for an automated derivation of urban structure types at block level. Remote Sensing Environment, 154, 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang, L., Shi, C., Diao, C., Ji, W., & Yin, D. (2016). A survey of methods incorporating spatial information in image classification and spectral unmixing. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 37(16), 3870–3910.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1204032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang, G.-G., Deb, S., Gao, X.-Z., & Coelho, L. D. S. (2015). A new metaheuristic optimisation algorithm motivated by elephant herding behaviour. International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation, 8(6), 394–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wu, C., Zhang, L., & Du, B. (2017). Kernel slow feature analysis for scene change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(4), 2367–2384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhang, F., Du, B., & Zhang, L. (2014). Saliency-guided unsupervised feature learning for scene classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(4), 2175–2184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhao, B., Zhong, Y., Xia, G. S., & Zhang, L. (2016). Dirichlet-derived multiple topic scene classification model for high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(4), 2108–2123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society of Remote Sensing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringGSSS Institute of Engineering and Technology for WomenMysoreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringATME College of EngineeringMysoreIndia
  3. 3.SDM Institute of TechnologyUjire, BelthangadyIndia
  4. 4.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringMalnad College of EngineeringHassanIndia

Personalised recommendations