Water Harvesting Structure Positioning by Using Geo-Visualization Concept and Prioritization of Mini-Watersheds Through Morphometric Analysis in the Lower Tapi Basin

  • Dhruvesh P Patel
  • Mrugen B Dholakia
  • N. Naresh
  • Prashant K. Srivastava
Research Article

Abstract

Geo-visualization concept has been used for positioning water harvesting structures in Varekhadi watershed consisting of 26 mini watersheds, falling in Lower Tapi Basin (LTB), Surat district, Gujarat state. For prioritization of the mini watersheds, morphometric analysis was utilized by using the linear parameters such as bifurcation ratio (Rb), drainage density (Dd), stream frequency (Fu), texture ratio (T), length of overland flow (Lo) and the shape parameter such as form factor (Rf), shape factor (Bs), elongation ratio (Re), compactness constant (Cc) and circularity ratio (Rc). The different prioritization ranks were assigned after evaluation of the compound factor. 3 Dimensional (3D) Elevation Model (DEM) from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) and DEM from topo contour were analyzed in ArcScene 9.1 and the fly tool was utilized for the Geo-visualization of Varekhadi mini watersheds as per the priority ranks. Combining this with soil map and slope map, the best feasibility of positioning check dams in mini-watershed no. 1, 5 and 24 has been proposed, after validation of the sites.

Keywords

SRTM LTB GIS Morphometric Analysis Prioritization Geo-visualization 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to Bhaskaracharya Institute For Space Applications and Geo-Informatics (BISAG), National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, National Resources Information System, Survey of India and Technical Bulletin- Report on Reconnaissance Soil Survey of Surat District for providing necessary data, facilities and support during the study period.

References

  1. Buttenfield, B. P., & Mackaness, W. A. (1991). Visualization: Geographic Information System, edited by Goodchild M. Longman, London: Maguire D and Rhind D.Google Scholar
  2. Central Water Commission, (2000–2001). Water Year Book 2000–2001 Tapi Basin. Hydrological observation circle, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.Google Scholar
  3. Chopra, R., Dhiman, R., & Sharma, P. K. (2005). Morphometric analysis of sub-watersheds in Gurdaspur District. Punjab using remote sensing and GIS Technique. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 33(4), 531–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dowman, I., & Balan, P. (2007). Mapping remote areas using SRTM and ASTER digital elevation model data: a solution to orientation problems. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 283, 143–147. doi: 10.1144/SP283.13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edet, A. E., Okereke, C. S., Teme, S. C., & Esu, E. O. (1998). Application of remote sensing data to groundwater exploration: a case study of the Cross River State, south-eastern Nigeria. Hydrogeology Journal, 6(3), 394–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fujita, K., Suzuki, R., Nuimura, T., & Sakai, A. (2008). Performance of ASTER and SRTM DEMs, and their potential for assessing glacial lakes in the Lunana region, Bhutan Himalaya. Journal of Glaciology, 54(185), 220–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gupta, M., & Srivastava, P. K. (2010). Integrating GIS and remote sensing for identification of groundwater potential zones in the hilly terrain of Pavagarh, Gujarat, India. Water International, 35, 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Horton, R. E. (1932). Drainage basin characteristics. Transaction American Geophysical Union, 13, 350–361.Google Scholar
  9. Horton, R. E. (1945). Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 56, 275–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hubbard, B. E., Sheridan, M. F., Carrasco-Núñez, G., Díaz-Castellón, R., & Rodríguez, S. R. (2007). Comparative lahar hazard mapping at Volcan Citlaltépetl, Mexico using SRTM, ASTER and DTED-1 digital topographic data. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 160, 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MacEachren, A. M. (1994). Visualization in modern cartography: setting the agenda in Visualization in Modern Cartography, edited by MacEachren (pp. 1–13). Pergamon, London: Alan and Taylor DRF.Google Scholar
  12. Melton, M. A. (1957). An analysis of the relations among the elements of climate, surface properties, and geomorphology. Technical Report 11. New York: Department of Geology, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  13. Miller, V. C. (1953). A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee, Proj. NR, Tech. Rep. 3, Columbia University, Department of Geology, ONR, New York, pp 389–402.Google Scholar
  14. Nag, S. K. (1998). Morphometric analysis using remote sensing techniques in the Chaka sub-basin, Purulia district, West Bengal. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 26(1–2), 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nookaratnam, K., Srivastava, Y. K., Venkateswarao, V., Amminedu, E., & Murthy, K. S. R. (2005). Check dam positioning by prioritization of micro-watersheds using SYI model and Morphometric analysis—Remote sensing and GIS perspective. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 33(1), 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Patel, D. P., & Dholakia, M. B. (2010a). Feasible structural and non- structural measures to minimize effect of flood in lower Tapi Basin. International Journal on WSEAS Transactions on Fluid Mechanics, 3(5), 104–121.Google Scholar
  17. Patel, D. P., & Dholakia, M. B. (2010b). Identifying probable submergence area of Surat city using digital elevation model and geographical information system. World Applied Sciences Journal, 9(4), 461–466.Google Scholar
  18. Schumn, S. A. (1956). Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 67, 597–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Singh, J. P., Singh, D., & Litoria, P. K. (2009). Selection of suitable site for water harvesting structure in Soankhad watershed, Punjab using Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System (RS and GIS) approach—A case study. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 37, 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Singh, S., & Singh, M. C. (1997). Morphometric analysis of Kanhar river basin. National Geographical journal of India, 43(1), 31–43.Google Scholar
  21. Srivastava, P. K., Mukherjee, S., Gupta, M., & Singh, S. K. (2011). Characterizing Monsoonal variation on water quality index of River Mahi in India using geographical information system. Water Quality, Exposure and Health, 2, 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Strahler, A. N. (1964). Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks, section 4-II. In V. T. Chow (Ed.), Handbook of Applied Hydrology (pp. 04–39). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  23. Thakkar, A. K., & Dhiman, S. D. (2007). Morphometric analysis and prioritization of mini watersheds in Mohr watersheds. Gujarat using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 35(4), 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. WMO (2007). The Role Of Land-Use Planning In Flood Management. World Meteorological Organization: Associated Programme On Flood Management.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society of Remote Sensing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dhruvesh P Patel
    • 1
  • Mrugen B Dholakia
    • 2
  • N. Naresh
    • 3
  • Prashant K. Srivastava
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.LDRP-Institute of Technology and Research, Sector-15GandhinagarIndia
  2. 2.Water Resources ManagementLDCEAhmedabadIndia
  3. 3.RMSI LtdNoidaIndia
  4. 4.Remote Sensing Technology, Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  5. 5.Department of Biological and Environmental ScienceNVPASAnandIndia

Personalised recommendations