Advertisement

Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences

, Volume 11, Issue 9, pp 4711–4728 | Cite as

X-ray computed microtomography of Late Copper Age decorated bowls with cross-shaped foots from central Slovenia and the Trieste Karst (North-Eastern Italy): technology and paste characterisation

  • Federico BernardiniEmail author
  • Elena Leghissa
  • David Prokop
  • Anton Velušček
  • Angelo De Min
  • Diego Dreossi
  • Sandro Donato
  • Claudio Tuniz
  • Francesco Princivalle
  • Manuela Montagnari Kokelj
Original Paper
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

About 20 Late Copper Age bowls with cross-shaped foots from Deschmann’s pile dwellings (Ljubljansko barje, central Slovenia) and Trieste Karst (North-Eastern Italy) have been investigated using X-ray computed microtomography (microCT) in order to study the vessel-forming technique, to characterise their pastes and to test the hypothesis that some Karst bowls could have been imported from nowadays central Slovenia or even more distant regions. In three selected virtual slices per sample, clay, lithic inclusions and pores have been segmented and quantified. In addition, the area, maximum length and width of each lithic inclusion have been calculated. Then, the microCT-derived results have been statistically analysed by principal component analysis (PCA). The orientation of pores and disjunctions in microCT volumes show that the basins of the bowls were built using mainly the coiling technique, while the base was shaped starting from a central piece, to which a layer of clay was added and then reshaped in order to produce the foots. The Slovenian bowls include both medium/coarse-grained and very fine- or fine-grained vessels mainly tempered with carbonate inclusions. The pastes of the Karst bowls are considerably heterogeneous. One bowl was most likely imported to the Karst but not from central Slovenia as it shows peculiar components, shape and decoration. The other two imported vessels show a very fine-grained paste comparable to the one of several samples from Deschmann’s pile dwellings. Such technological similarity is confirmed by PCA of microCT data and petrographic observations. Our study confirms the existence of strong cultural connections between central Slovenia and the northernmost Adriatic coast during the Late Copper Age.

Keywords

Late Copper Age decorated bowls Central Slovenia Trieste Karst (North-Eastern Italy) X-ray computed microtomography PCA of microCT-derived data Technology Paste characterisation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Margherita Di Giovannantonio for the language review of the paper.

Funding information

David Prokop has been financially supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic under the project CEITEC 2020 (LQ1601) and by the project CEITEC Nano Research Infrastructure (MEYS CR, 2016–2019). Sandro Donato is partially supported by Consorzio per la Fisica Trieste. This research has been supported by Fondo Ricerca Ateneo 2018 of Trieste University in the framework of the project SCAN (Studio mineralogico, petrografico e strutturale di Ceramiche ANtiche tramite metodologie convenzionali e innovative).

Supplementary material

12520_2019_811_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (17 kb)
Supplementary Table 1 Areas (μm2) of clay, lithic inclusions and pores in three slices per sample. (XLSX 17 kb)

References

  1. Bernardini F (2018) Polished stone axes in Caput Adriae from the Neolithic to the Copper Age. J World Prehist 31(4):485–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernardini F, Tuniz C, Coppa A, Mancini L, Dreossi D, Eichert D, Turco G, Biasotto M, Terrasi F, De Cesare N, Hua Q, Levchenko V (2012) Beeswax as dental filling on a neolithic human tooth. PLoS One 7(9):e44904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernardini F, Sgambati A, Montagnari Kokelj M, Zaccaria C, Micheli R, Fragiacomo A, Tiussi C, Dreossi D, Tuniz C, De Min A (2013) Airborne LiDAR application to karst areas: the example of Trieste Province (North-Eastern Italy) from prehistoric sites to Roman forts. J Archaeol Sci 40:2152–2160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernardini F, De Min A, Lenaz D, Kasztovszky Z, Turk P, Velušček A, Szilágyi V, Tuniz C, Montagnari Kokelj E (2014a) Mineralogical and chemical constraints about the provenance of Copper Age polished stone axes of “Ljubljana type” from Caput Adriae. Archaeometry 56(2):175–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernardini F, De Min A, Lenaz D, Kasztovszky Z, Turk P, Velušček A, Tuniz C, Montagnari Kokelj E (2014b) Petrographic and geochemical comparison between the Copper Age “Ljubljana type” axes and similar lithotypes from Eisenkappler Diabaszug complex (southern Austria). J Archaeol Sci 41:511–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernardini F, Vinci G, Horvat J, De Min A, Forte E, Furlani S, Lenaz D, Pipan M, Zhao W, Sgambati A, Potleca M, Micheli R, Fragiacomo A, Tuniz C (2015) Early Roman military fortifications and the origin of Trieste (Italy). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:1520–1529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernardini F, Vecchiet A, De Min A, Lenaz D, Mendoza Cuevas A, Gianoncelli A, Dreossi D, Tuniz C (2016) Neolithic pottery from the Trieste Karst (Northeastern Italy): a multi-analytical study. Microchem J 124:600–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernardini F, Sibilia E, Kasztovszky Z, Boscutti F, De Min A, Lenaz D, Turco G, Micheli R, Tuniz C, Montagnari Kokelj M (2017) Evidence of open-air late prehistoric occupation in the Trieste area (North-Eastern Italy): dating, 3D clay plaster characterization and obsidian provenancing. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 10:1933–1943.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-017-0504-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bóna I (1965) The peoples of southern origin of the Early Bronze Age in Hungary I-II. Alba Regia 4–5:17–63Google Scholar
  10. Buchvaldek M (1967) Die Schnurkeramik in Böhmen. Acta Universitatis Carolinae XIX, Philosophica et Historica Monographia XIX, PragueGoogle Scholar
  11. Dimitrijević S (1956) Prilog daljem upoznavanju vučedolske kulture / Ein Beitrag zur weiteren Kenntnis der Vučedoler kultur. Opusc Archaeol 1:79–85Google Scholar
  12. Dimitrijević S (1966) Rezultati arheoloških iskopavanja na področju Vinkovačkog muzeja od 1957–1965 godine. Acta Musei Cibalensis 1, VinkovciGoogle Scholar
  13. Dimitrijević S (1979) Vučedolska kultura i vučedolski kulturni kompleks. In: Benac A (ed) Praistorija jugoslovanskih zemalja III. Eneolit, Sarajevo, pp 267–341Google Scholar
  14. Duches R, Nannini N, Fontana A, Boschin F, Crezzini J, Bernardini F, Tuniz C, Dalmeri G (2018) Archeological bone injuries by lithic backed projectiles: new evidence on bear hunting from the Late Epigravettian site of Cornafessa rock shelter (Italy). Archaeol Anthropol Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-018-0674-y
  15. Ecsedy I (1977) Adatok a Somogyvár-Vinkovci kultúra kérdéséhez (Angaben zur Frage der Somogyvár-Vinkovci Kultur). Janus Pannonius Múzeum 22:185–194 Google Scholar
  16. Furholt M (2003) Die absolutchronologische Datierung der schnurkeramik in Mitteleuropa und Südskaninavien. Universitätsforschungen zur Prähistorischen Archäologie, Bonn, p 101Google Scholar
  17. Gilli E, Montagnari Kokelj E (1993) La grotta dei Ciclami nel Carso Triestino (Materiali degli scavi 1959-1961). Atti Soc Preist Friuli-Venezia Giulia 7:65–162 Google Scholar
  18. Gilli E, Montagnari Kokelj E (1994) La Grotta delle Gallerie nel Carso Triestino. Atti Soc Preist Friuli-Venezia Giulia 8:121–194Google Scholar
  19. Gilli E, Montagnari Kokelj E (1996) La Grotta degli Zingari nel Carso Triestino (Materiali degli scavi 1961-1965). Atti Soc Preist Friuli-Venezia Giulia 9:63–126Google Scholar
  20. Govedarica B (1989) Rano bronzano doba na področju istočnog Jadrana (L'age du bronze ancien dans la region de l'Adriatique de l'est). Djela ANUBiH 67/7, SarajevoGoogle Scholar
  21. Jolliffe IT (2002) Principal component analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Kahl W-A, Ramminger B (2012) Non-destructive fabric analysis of prehistoric pottery using high-resolution X-ray microtomography: a pilot study on the late Mesolithic to Neolithic site Hamburg-Boberg. J Archaeol Sci 39:2206–2219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaiser E (2013) Import, imitation and interaction: a critical review of the chronology and significance of cross footed bowls of the third millennium BC in Southeastern and Eastern Europe. In: Heyd V, Kulcsár G, Szeverényi V (eds) Transitions to the Bronze Age interregional interaction and socio-cultural change in the third millennium BC Carpathian Basin and neighbouring regions. Archaeolingua 49, Budapest, pp 139–152Google Scholar
  24. Kassambara A (2017) Practical guide to principal component methods in R, 1st edn. STHDAGoogle Scholar
  25. Korošec P (1958–1959) Kulturna opredelitev materialne kulture na koliščih pri Igu. Arh vest 9–10:94–107Google Scholar
  26. Korošec P, Korošec J (1969) Najdbe s koliščarskih naselbin pri Igu na Ljubljanskem barju / Fundgut der Pfahlbausiedlungen bei Ig am Laibacher Moor. Arheološki katalogi Slovenije 3, LjubljanaGoogle Scholar
  27. Kulcsár G (2009) The Beginnings of the Bronze Age in the Carpathian Basin. The Makó–Kosihy–Čaka and the Somogyvár–Vinkovci cultures in Hungary. Varia archaeologica Hungarica 23, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  28. Leghissa E (2015) Način okraševanja keramike ljubljanske kulture in pramenaste keramike – eksperimentalna arheologija (Decorating the pottery of the Ljubljana culture and the Litzen pottery—an experimental archaeology case study). Arh vest 66: 275–292Google Scholar
  29. Leghissa E (2017) Dežmanova kolišča pri Igu in njihovo mesto v pozni bakreni in zgodnji bronasti dobi (The Dežman (Deschmann) pile dwellings near Ig in the Late Copper and Early Bronze ages). Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Department of archaeology, LjubljanaGoogle Scholar
  30. Leghissa E (2018) Od prve fotografije do prve radiokarbonski datacije. Vučedolska koliščarska naselbina na Ljubljanskem barju (From the first photo to the first radiocarbon date. A Vučedol pile dwelling site in the Ljubljansko barje). In: Črešnar M, Vinazza M (eds) Srečanja in vplivi v raziskovanju bronaste in železne dobe na Slovenskem: Zbornik prispevkov v čast Bibi Teržan. Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani, Ljubljana, pp 39–52Google Scholar
  31. Lindahl A, Pikirayi I (2010) Ceramics and change: an overview of pottery production techniques in northern South Africa and eastern Zimbabwe during the first and second millennium AD. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 2:133–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Machado AS, Oliveira DF, Gama Filho HS, Latini R, Bellido AVB, Assis JT, Anjosb MJ, Lopes RT (2017) Archeological ceramic artifacts characterization through computed microtomography and X-ray fluorescence. X-Ray Spectrom 46:427–434.  https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.2786 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maran J (1998) Kulturwandel auf dem griechischen Festland und den Kykladen im späten 3. Jahrtausend v. Chr. Universitätsforschungen zur Prähistorischen Archäologie 53, BonnGoogle Scholar
  34. Marzolini G (1970) La Grotta dell'Edera. Annali del gruppo Grotte dell'Associazione XXX Ottobre 4:19–35Google Scholar
  35. Marzolini G (1983) La Grotta del Pettine di Gabrovizza (Carso Triestino). Atti Soc Preist Friuli-Venezia Giulia 4:33–43Google Scholar
  36. Medunová-Benešová A (1977) “Palliardiho hradisko” Eine äneolitische Höhensiedlung bei Vysočany, Bez. Znojmo, Katalog der Funde. Fontes Archaeologiae Moravicae IX, BrnoGoogle Scholar
  37. Montagnari Kokelj E (1981) Appunti per una storia degli studi sulla “cultura di Lubiana”. Atti dei Civici musei di storia ed arte di Trieste 12(1):13–36Google Scholar
  38. Montagnari Kokelj E, Crismani A (1997) La Grotta del Mitreo nel Carso triestino. Atti Soc Preist Friuli-Venezia Giulia 10:7–98Google Scholar
  39. Montagnari Kokelj E, Greif T, Presello E (2002) La Grotta Cotariova nel Carso triestino (Italia nord-orinetale). Materiali ceramici degli scavi 1950-70 (The Grotta Cotoriova in the Trieste Karst (North-Eastern Italy). The pottery of the 1950-70 excavations). Aquileia Nostra 73:37–190Google Scholar
  40. Parzinger H (1984) Die Stellung der Uferrandsiedlungen bei Ljubljana im äneolitischen und frühbronzezeitlichen Kultursystem der mittleren Donauländer (Mesto kolišč Ljubljanskega barja v eneolitiku in zgodnji bronasti dobi srednjega Podonavja). Arh vest 35:13–75Google Scholar
  41. Sanger MC (2016) Investigating pottery vessel manufacturing techniques using radiographic imaging and computed tomography: studies from the Late Archaic American southeast. J Archaeol Sci Rep 9:586–598Google Scholar
  42. Spataro M (1999) La caverna dell’Edera di Aurisina (TS): archeometria delle ceramiche. Atti Soc Preist Friuli-Venezia Giulia 11:63–90Google Scholar
  43. Tuniz C, Bernardini F, Turk I, Dimkaroski L, Mancini L, Dreossi D (2012) Did neanderthals play music? X-ray computed micro-tomography of the Divje babe ‘flute’? Archaeometry 54:581–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tuniz C, Bernardini F, Cicuttin A, Crespo ML, Dreossi D, Gianoncelli A, Mancini L, Mendoza Cuevas A, Sodini N, Tromba G, Zanini F, Zanolli C (2013) The ICTP-Elettra X-ray laboratory for cultural heritage and archaeology. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 711:106–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Žibrat Gašparič A (2013) A new look at old material: ceramic petrography and neo/eneolithic pottery traditions in the eastern Ljubljansko barje, Slovenia. DocPraeh 40:147–164Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Federico Bernardini
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Elena Leghissa
    • 3
  • David Prokop
    • 4
    • 5
  • Anton Velušček
    • 3
  • Angelo De Min
    • 6
  • Diego Dreossi
    • 7
  • Sandro Donato
    • 8
    • 9
  • Claudio Tuniz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Francesco Princivalle
    • 6
  • Manuela Montagnari Kokelj
    • 10
  1. 1.Centro Fermi, Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro di Studi e Ricerche “Enrico Fermi”RomeItaly
  2. 2.Multidisciplinary LaboratoryThe Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical PhysicsTriesteItaly
  3. 3.Institute of Archaeology, ZRC SAZULjubljanaSlovenia
  4. 4.Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC)BrnoCzech Republic
  5. 5.Institute of Physical EngineeringBrno University of TechnologyBrnoCzech Republic
  6. 6.Department of Mathematics and GeosciencesUniversity of TriesteTriesteItaly
  7. 7.Elettra-Sincrotrone Trieste S.C.p.A.TriesteItaly
  8. 8.Department of PhysicsUniversity of TriesteTriesteItaly
  9. 9.INFN Sezione di TriesteTriesteItaly
  10. 10.Department of Humanistic StudiesUniversity of TriesteTriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations