Advertisement

The small-world topology of Clovis lithic networks

  • Briggs BuchananEmail author
  • Marcus J. Hamilton
  • J. David Kilby
Original Paper
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

North America was first settled in the late Pleistocene by Paleoindian peoples, Clovis is the best documented archeological complex associated with this settlement. Undoubtedly, Clovis groups faced adaptive challenges in the novel environments of a sparsely populated New World. In this paper, we ask whether Clovis had small-world networks to help them create and maintain connections across the vast landscape of western North America. Small worlds are properties of many real networks and are characterized by high clustering and short path lengths. To investigate this, we examined the topology of Clovis lithic networks in western North America. We employed two commonly used measures of network topology in our analyses of regional Clovis lithic networks and show that stone raw material was transported and exchanged with the characteristics of a small world. We also show that caching and the long-distance movement of stone was an important part of creating small worlds. Clovis small-world lithic networks may have mapped onto Clovis social networks or may have been independent of other networks, but either way, lithic exchange networks were far from random and served an important role in connecting local populations.

Keywords

Clovis Lithic network Small world Caches 

Notes

Supplementary material

12520_2018_767_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (23 kb)
ESM 1 (XLSX 23 kb)

References

  1. Anderson DG, Gillam JC (2001) Paleoindian interaction and mating networks: reply to Moore and Moseley. Am Antiq 66:530–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bocquet-Appel J-P (1985) Small populations: demography and paleoanthropological inferences. J Hum Evol 14:683–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buchanan B, Hamilton MJ, Kilby JD, Gingerich JAM (2016) Lithic networks reveal early regionalization in Late Pleistocene North America. J Archaeol Sci 65:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchanan B, Andrews B, Kilby JD, Eren MI (2019) Settling into the country: comparison of Clovis and Folsom lithic networks in western North America shows increasing redundancy of toolstone use. J Anthropol Archaeol 53:32–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellis CJ (2008) The fluted point tradition and the arctic small tool tradition: what’s the connection? J Anthropol Archaeol 273:298–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eren MI, Buchanan B (2016) Clovis technology eLS:1–9Google Scholar
  7. Frison G, Bradley B (1999) The Fenn cache: Clovis weapons and tools. One Horse Land and Cattle Company, Santa Fe, NMGoogle Scholar
  8. Girvan M, Newman ME (2002) Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:7821–7826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goodyear A (1989) A hypothesis for the use of cryptocrystalline raw materials among Paleoindian groups of North America. In: Ellis C, Lothrop J (eds) Eastern Paleoindian lithic resource use. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  10. Hamilton MJ, Buchanan B (2007) Spatial gradients in Clovis-age radiocarbon dates across North America suggest rapid colonization from the north. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:15625–15630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamilton MJ, Buchanan B (2010) Archaeological support for the three-stage expansion of modern humans across northeastern Eurasia and into the Americas. PLoS One 5:e12472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haynes G (2002) The early settlement of North America: the Clovis era. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Haynes CV Jr, Donahue DJ, Jull AJT, Zabel TH (1984) Application of accelerator dating to fluted point Paleoindian sites. Archaeol East N Am 12:184–191Google Scholar
  14. Haynes G, Anderson DG, Ferring CR, Fiedel SJ, Grayson DK, Haynes CV Jr, Holliday VT, Huckell BB, Kornfeld M, Meltzer DJ, Morrow J, Surovell T, Waguespack NM, Wigand P, Yohe RM II (2007) Comment on “redefining the age of Clovis: implications for the peopling of the Americas”. Science 317:320bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holliday VT (2000) The evolution of Paleoindian geochronology and typology on the Great Plains. Geoarchaeology 15:227–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huckell B, Kilby JD, Boulanger MT, Glascock MD (2011) Sentinel Butte: neutron activation analysis of White River group chert from a primary source and artifacts from a Clovis cache in North Dakota, USA. J Archaeol Sci 38:965–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kalamaras DV (2018) Social Network Visualizer version 2.4. http://socnetv.org
  18. Kelly RL, Todd LC (1988) Coming into the country: early Paleoindian hunting and mobility. Am Antiq 53:231–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kilby JD (2008) An investigation of Clovis caches: content, function, and technological organization. Dissertation, University of New MexicoGoogle Scholar
  20. Kilby JD (2014) Direction and distance in Clovis caching: the movement of people and lithic raw materials on the Clovis-age landscape. In: Huckell BB, Kilby JD (eds) Clovis caches: recent discoveries and new research. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, pp 201–216Google Scholar
  21. Kilby JD (2015) A regional perspective on Clovis blades and blade caching. In: Jennings T, Smallwood A (eds) Clovis: on the edge of a new understanding. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, pp 145–159Google Scholar
  22. Kilby JD, Huckell BB (2013) Clovis caches: current perspectives and future directions. In: Graf KE, Ketron CV, Waters MR (eds) Paleoamerican odyssey. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, pp 257–272Google Scholar
  23. Kleinberg JM (2000) Navigation in a small world. Nature 406:845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lycett S (2017) Cultural patterns within and outside of the post-contact Great Plains as revealed by parfleche characteristics: implications for areal arrangements in artefactual data. J Anthropol Archaeol 48:87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meltzer DJ (2002) What do you do when no one’s been there before? Thoughts on the exploration and colonization of new lands. In: Jablonski N (ed) The first Americans: the Pleistocene colonization of the New World. Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences 27, San Francisco, pp 25–56Google Scholar
  26. Meltzer DJ (2004) Peopling of North America. In: Gillespie A, Porter S, Atwater B (eds) The quaternary period in the United States. Elsevier, New York, pp 539–563Google Scholar
  27. Meltzer DJ (2009) First peoples in a New World: colonizing ice age America. University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller DS, Holliday VT, Bright J (2013) in Paleoamerican Odyssey, Eds., Graf, K.E., Ketron, C.V., Waters, M.R., Texas A&M University press, College Station, pp. 207–220Google Scholar
  29. Moore JH, Moseley ME (2001) How many frogs does it take to leap around the Americas? Comments on Anderson and Gillam. Am Antiq 66:526–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Newman M (2010) Networks: an introduction. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Prasciunas MM, Surovell TA (2015) Reevaluating the duration of Clovis: The problem of non-representative radiocarbon dates. In: Smallwood AM, Jennings TA (eds) Clovis: on the edge of a new understanding. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, pp 21–35Google Scholar
  32. Rasmussen M, Anzick SL, Waters MR, Skoglund P, DeGiorgio M, Stafford TW Jr, Rasmussen S et al (2014) The genome of a Late Pleistocene human from a Clovis burial site in western Montana. Nature 506:225–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanchez G, Holliday VT, Gaines EP, Arroyo-Cabrales J, Martínez-Tagüeña N, Kowler A, Lange T, Hodgins GWL, Mentzer SM, Sanchez-Morlaes I (2014) Human (Clovis)–gomphothere (Cuvieronius sp.) association∼ 13,390 calibrated yBP in Sonora, Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:10972–10977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smallwood AM, Jennings TA (2015) Clovis: on the edge of a new understanding. Texas A&M University Press, College StationGoogle Scholar
  35. Telesford QK, Joyce KE, Hayasaka S, Burdette JH, Laurienti PJ (2011) The ubiquity of small-world networks. Brain Connect 1:367–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Waters MR, Stafford TW Jr (2007) Redefining the age of Clovis: implications for the peopling of the Americas. Science 315:1122–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Waters MR, Stafford TW Jr (2014) The first Americans: a review of the evidence for the late-Pleistocene peopling of the Americas. In: Graf KE, Ketron CV, Waters MR (eds) Paleoamerican odyssey. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, pp 541–560Google Scholar
  38. Watts DJ (1999) Small worlds: the dynamics of networks between order and randomness. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  39. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393:440–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Whallon R (2006) Social networks and information: non-“utilitarian” mobility among hunter-gatherers. J Anthropol Archaeol 25:259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wobst HM (1974) Boundary conditions for Paleolithic social systems: a simulation approach. Am Antiq 39:147–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Briggs Buchanan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marcus J. Hamilton
    • 2
  • J. David Kilby
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of TulsaTulsaUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of Texas at San AntonioSan AntonioUSA
  3. 3.Department of AnthropologyTexas State UniversitySan MarcosUSA

Personalised recommendations