Advertisement

Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences

, Volume 11, Issue 11, pp 5909–5920 | Cite as

Variance in the response of silcrete to rapid heating complicates assumptions about past heat treatment methods

  • Alex MackayEmail author
  • Sam C. Lin
  • Lachlan S. Kenna
  • Alex F. Blackwood
Original Paper
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Controlled experiments in lithic technology and function

Abstract

Heat treatment of silcretes in the Middle Stone Age of southern Africa has been taken to indicate complex behaviour among early modern humans. This inference is based on the apparent sensitivity of silcretes to rapid changes in temperature, requiring well-regulated heating and cooling rates, and controls over maximum heating temperatures. Alternative arguments have been made that silcrete can effectively be heat treated with limited control over heating rates such that heat treatment may have been a relatively simple process. These apparently contrasting points of view elide the fact that different silcretes may respond differently to heating, and that no single approach may be appropriate in all cases. To test this proposition, we undertook a series of controlled experiments in which silcrete from two sources on the south coast of Australia were prepared into blocks of specific sizes and heated rapidly to a range of maximum temperatures in a muffle furnace. In addition to potential differences in response between sources to heat, our experiments test two factors—stone volume and maximum heating temperature—that were advanced by past explanatory models to account for the probability of sample failure (fracture) during heating. The results of our experiments suggest that the tolerance of silcretes to high heating rates is highly variable between sources within regions, and that the effect of variation between sources is stronger than the other factors examined. Additional tests on limited samples from sources in South Africa support the general relevance of our findings. From these results, we infer that optimal approaches to heating in the past were probably sensitive to the silcretes being heated.

Keywords

Silcrete Heat treatment Australia South Africa 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Teresa E. Steele for enabling this research at Varsche Rivier 003, and Jacob Noblett for helping collect silcretes in NSW.

Funding information

AM’s research was funded by an Australian Research Council DECRA grant (DE130100068). Identification of sources around Varsche Rivier 003 and our campfire experiments occurred during the project ‘Varsche Rivier 003: A new Middle Stone Age site (Namaqualand, South Africa)’ funded by a National Research Foundation grant (Award #1324719) to Teresa E. Steele. AFB was funded by the Tessa and Mortimer Wheeler Travel Award.

Supplementary material

12520_2018_663_MOESM1_ESM.7z (6 kb)
ESM 1 (7Z 5 kb)

References

  1. Agresti A (2007) An introduction to categorical data analysis, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barr DJ, Levy R, Scheepers C, Tily HJ (2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. J Mem Lang 68:255–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown KS, Marean CW, Herries AIR, Jacobs Z, Tribolo C, Braun D, Roberts DL, Meyer MC, Bernatchez J (2009) Fire as an engineering tool of early modern humans. Science 325:859–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Byers DA, Picka C, Ray JH (2014) Heat treatment, Ozarks cherts, and prehistoric toolstone use in Southwest Missouri. Am Antiq 79:507–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calender JH (1978) A study of silcretes near Marulan and Milton, New South Wales. In: Langford-Smith T (ed) Silcrete in Australia. University of New England, Armidale, pp 209–222Google Scholar
  6. Christensen RHB (2015a) Analysis of ordinal data with cumulative link models—estimation with the R-package ordinal. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ordinal/vignettes/clm_intro.pdf
  7. Christensen RHB (2015b) Ordinal-regression models for ordinal data. R package version 2015.6–28. http://www.cran.r-project.org/package=ordinal/
  8. Crabtree DE, Butler BR (1964) Notes on experiments in flintknapping 1: heat treatment of silica minerals. Tebiwa 7:1–6Google Scholar
  9. Delagnes A, Schmidt P, Douze K, Wurz S, Bellot-Gurlet L, Conard NJ, Nickel KG, van Niekerk KL, Henshilwood CS (2016) Early evidence for the extensive heat treatment of silcrete in the Howiesons Poort at Klipdrift Shelter (Layer PBD, 65 ka), South Africa. PLoS One 11:e0163874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanckel M (1985) Hot rocks: heat treatment at Burrill Lake and Currarong. Archaeol Ocean 20:98–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hothorn T, Hornik K, van de Wiel MA, Zeileis A (2008) Implementing a class of permutation tests: the coin package. J Stat Softw 28:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hughes PJ, Sullivan ME, Lampert RJ (1973) The use of silcrete by aborigines in southern coastal NSW. Archaeol Ocean 8:220–225Google Scholar
  13. Kenna LS (2016) Understanding intra-source and inter-source variation on the success of silcrete heat treatment. Unpublished BA Honours thesis. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of WollongongGoogle Scholar
  14. Mandeville MD, Flenniken JJ (1974) A comparison of the flaking qualities of Nehawka Chert before and after thermal pretreatment. Plains Anthropol 19:146–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marwick B (2017) Computational reproducibility in archaeological research: basic principles and a case study of their implementation. J Archaeol Method Theory 24:424–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mercieca A, Hiscock P (2008) Experimental insights into alternative strategies of lithic heat treatment. J Archaeol Sci 35:2634–2639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna https://www.R-project.org/ Google Scholar
  18. Roberts DL (2003) Age, genesis and significance of South African coastal belt silcretes, vol 95. Council for Geoscience, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  19. Schmidt P (2014) What causes failure (overheating) during lithic heat treatment? Archaeol Anthropol Sci 6:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmidt P (2016) The ‘sand-bath’ and lithic heat treatment in the South African Middle Stone Age: myth or reality? Afr Archaeol Rev 33:99–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schmidt P, Mackay A (2016) Why was silcrete heat-treated in the Middle Stone Age? An early transformative technology in the context of raw material use at Mertenhof Rock Shelter, South Africa. PLoS One 11:e0149243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schmidt P, Porraz G, Slodczyk A, Bellot-Gurlet L, Archer W, Miller CE (2013) Heat treatment in the South African Middle Stone Age: temperature induced transformations of silcrete and their technological implications. J Archaeol Sci 40:3519–3531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schmidt P, Porraz G, Bellot-Gurlet L, February E, Ligouis B, Paris C, Texier P, Parkington JE, Miller CE, Nickel KG, Conard NJ (2015) A previously undescribed organic residue sheds light on heat treatment in the Middle Stone Age. J Hum Evol 85:22–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmidt P, February E, Bretzke K, Bellot-Gurlet L (2017a) Tempering-residue on heat-treated silcrete: an experimental perspective and a potential analytical protocol. J Archaeol Sci Rep 15:611–619Google Scholar
  25. Schmidt P, Lauer C, Buck G, Miller CE, Nickel KG (2017b) Detailed near-infrared study of the ‘water’-related transformations in silcrete upon heat treatment. Phys Chem of Miner 44:21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schmidt P, Nash DJ, Coulson S, Göden MB, Awcock GJ (2017c) Heat treatment as a universal technical solution for silcrete use? A comparison between silcrete from the Western Cape (South Africa) and the Kalahari (Botswana). PLoS One 12:e0181586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Steele TE, Mackay A, Fitzsimmons KE, Igreja M, Marwick B, Orton J, Schwortz S, Stahlschmidt MC (2016) Varsche Rivier 003: a Middle and Later Stone Age site with Still Bay and Howiesons Poort assemblages in southern Namaqualand, South Africa. PaleoAnthropol 2016:100–163Google Scholar
  28. Summerfield MA (1981) The nature and occurrence of silcrete, southern Cape Province, South Africa. Oxford University School of Geography Research Papers, Oxford, p 28Google Scholar
  29. Villa P, Roebroeks W (2014) Neandertal demise: an archaeological analysis of the modern human superiority complex. PLoS One 9:e96424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wadley L, Prinsloo LC (2014) Experimental heat treatment of silcrete implies analogical reasoning in the Middle Stone Age. J Hum Evol 70:49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wickham H (2007) Reshaping data with the reshape package. J Stat Softw 21:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wickham H (2017) scales: Scale functions for visualization. R package version 05.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=scales
  34. Young RW, McDougall I (1982) Basalts and silcretes on the coast near Ulladulla, southern New South Wales. J Geol Soc of Aust 29:425–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex Mackay
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Sam C. Lin
    • 1
    • 3
  • Lachlan S. Kenna
    • 1
  • Alex F. Blackwood
    • 4
  1. 1.Centre for Archaeological Science, School of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  2. 2.Department of ArchaeologyUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa
  3. 3.Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and HeritageUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Archaeology and HistoryLa Trobe UniversityBundooraAustralia

Personalised recommendations