Advertisement

Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 597–608 | Cite as

Provenance investigation of Roman marble sarcophagi from Nicopolis, Epirus, Greece: revealing a strong artistic and trade connection with Athens

  • Dimitris TambakopoulosEmail author
  • Theodosia Stefanidou-Tiveriou
  • Eleni Papagianni
  • Yannis Maniatis
Original Paper
  • 68 Downloads

Abstract

A large number of marble sarcophagi have been discovered in the extensive cemeteries of ancient Nicopolis, ranging in date from the Hadrianic period to the middle of the third c. AD. The archaeological study, based on typological and stylistic criteria, indicates that many sarcophagi are imported from Athens, while a large part seems to be the product of local workshops that often follows closely Attic models. In order to identify securely the marble used for the sarcophagi, and therefore the sources used by the local workshops, 14 representative sarcophagi from the Archaeological Museum of Nicopolis were sampled and subjected to full scientific provenance analysis. This involved a combination of (a) in situ examination of the whole objects using optical techniques for measuring grain sizes and translucency, and recording of inclusions, veins and other features; (b) stable isotope analysis; and (c) electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. The results revealed a clear preference in the Pentelic marble: 12 out of 14 sarcophagi made in that marble, while 1 sarcophagus was made of marble from Thasos and 1 of an unidentified grey, coarse-grained, dolomitic marble. Pentelic marble was identified in sarcophagi considered as imports from Attica—as expected, but also in local products following attic models, with or without incorporating motifs from other places. This wide use of Pentelic marble for the local production, as well as the importation of Attic finished products, both luxurious options, designates the overall economic prosperity of Roman Nicopolis, but also its close trade and artistic connections with Athens.

Keywords

Marble provenance Attic sarcophagi Local workshops EPR Stable isotopes Optical examination 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our warmest thanks to the former Director of the Ephorate of Ioannina and excavator of Nicopolis K. Zachos, to the former Director of the Ephorate of Antiquities of Preveza Ch. Merkouri and to the archaeologist of the Ephorate of Preveza D. Sakkas for their help and support. We would like also to thank D. Terzopoulou who read carefully and corrected the archaeological part of the English text.

Funding information

This work was co-funded by the European Social Fund (ESF)—European Union and the Greek State under the “ARISTEIA II” action of the Operational Programme “Education and Lifelong Learning” [Sculpture and Society in Roman Greece: political, economic and religious context].

References

  1. Allison CE, Francey RJ, Meijer HAJ (1995) Recommendations for the reporting of stable isotope measurements of carbon and oxygen in CO2 gas. In: Reference and Intercomparison Materials for Stable Isotopes of Light Elements. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, pp 155–162Google Scholar
  2. Attanasio D (2003) Ancient white marbles: analysis and identification by paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. L’Erma di Bretschneider, RomaGoogle Scholar
  3. Attanasio D, Brilli M, Ogle N (2006) The isotope signature of classical marbles. L’Erma di Bretschneider, RomaGoogle Scholar
  4. Attanasio D, Bruno M, Prochaska W, Yavuz AB (2012) Aphrodisian marble from the Göktepe quarries: the little barbarians, roman copies from the Attalid dedication in Athens. Papers of the British School at Rome 80:65–87.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068246212000050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Craig H, Craig V (1972) Greek marbles: determination of provenance by isotopic analysis. Science 176:401–403.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.176.4033.401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gorgoni C, Lazzarini L, Pallante P, Turi B (2002) An updated and detailed mineropetrographic and C-O stable isotopic reference database for the main Mediterranean marbles used in antiquity. In: Herrmann J, Herz N, Newman R (eds) ASMOSIA 5: Interdisciplinary Studies on Ancient Stone—Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the Association for the Study of Marble and Other Stones in Antiquity. Archetype Publications, London, pp 115–131Google Scholar
  7. Herrmann JJ, Newman R (1999) Dolomitic marble from Thasos near and far: Macedonia, Ephesos and the Rhone. In: Schvoerer M (ed) Archéomatériaux: Marbres Et Autres Roches: Actes De La Ive Conférence Internationale De L’association Pour L’étude Des Marbres Et Autres Roches Utilisés Dans Le Passé. CRPAA-PUB (Universite Michel de Montaigne), Bordeaux, pp 293–303Google Scholar
  8. Herz N (1987) Carbon and oxygen isotopic ratios: a database for classical Greek and Roman marble. Archaeometry 29:35–43.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.1987.tb00395.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jarc S, Maniatis Y, Dotsika E et al (2010) Scientific characterization of the Pohorje marbles, Slovenia. Archaeometry 52:177–190.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2009.00476.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koch G, Sichtermann H (1982) Römische Sarkophage. C.H. Beck, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  11. Lapuente MP, Turi B, Blanc P (2000) Marbles from Roman Hispania: stable isotope and cathodoluminescence characterization. Appl Geochem 15:1469–1493.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(00)00002-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lazzarini L, Antonelli F (2003) Petrographic and isotopic characterization of the marble of the island of Tinos (Greece). Archaeometry 45:541–552.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-4754.2003.00127.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lazzarini L, Malacrino CG (2010) The white marble of Kos, its quarries and archaeometric characterisation. Marmora 6:57–70.  https://doi.org/10.1400/171746 Google Scholar
  14. Maniatis Y (2004) Scientific techniques and methodologies for the provenance of white marbles. In: Martini M, Milazzo M, Piacenntini M (eds) Physics methods in archaeometry proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi.”. Ios Press, Amsterdam, pp 179–202Google Scholar
  15. Maniatis Y, Tambakopoulos D, Dotsika E, Stefanidou-Tiveriou T (2010) Marble provenance investigation of Roman sarcophagi from Thessaloniki. Archaeometry 52:45–58.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2009.00469.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maniatis Y, Tambakopoulos D, Wescoat BD, Matsas D (2012) The Sanctuary of the Great Gods on Samothrace: an extended marble provenance study. In: Gutierrez Garcia-M A, Lapuente P, Roda I (eds) Interdisciplinary Studies on Ancient Stone, Proceedings of the IX Association for the Study of Marbles and Other Stones in Antiquity Conference. Institut Català d’Arqueologia Clàssica, Tarragona, pp 263–278Google Scholar
  17. Papagianni E (2015) Lokale Sarkophage aus Nikopolis. In: Porod B, Koiner G (eds) Römische Sarkophage. Akten des Internationalen Werkstattgesprächs 11–13 Oktober 2012 (Graz). Phoibos Verlag, Graz, pp 196–211Google Scholar
  18. Papagianni E (2012) Der Sarkophag in Preveza und die lokalen Werkstätten von Nikopolis. In: Koch G, Baratte F (eds) Akten des Symposiums “Sarkophage der Römischen Kaiserzeit: Produktion in den Zentren - Kopien in den Provinzen.” Verlag Franz Philipp Rutzen, Ruhpolding, Mainz, pp 161–166Google Scholar
  19. Papangeli P (1984) Ομάδα σαρκοφάγων στη Νικόπολη. Ηπειρωτικά Χρονικά 26:43–70Google Scholar
  20. Pike SH (2000) Archaeological geology and geochemistry of Pentelic marble, Mount Pentelikon, Attica. In: Greece. University of Georgia, PhD ThesisGoogle Scholar
  21. Polikreti K, Maniatis Y (2002) A new methodology for the provenance of marble based on EPR spectroscopy. Archaeometry 44:1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4754.00040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Prochaska W (2013) A sculptural marble of prime quality in antiquity—the dolomitic marble of the Sivec Mountains in Macedonia. Archaeometry 55:179–197.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2012.00689.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Riginos G, Katerini E (eds) (2009) Νικόπολη. Οδηγός Αρχαιολογικού Μουσείου. Υπουργείο Πολιτισμού, ΑθήναGoogle Scholar
  24. Russel B (2011) The Roman sarcophagus ‘industry’: a reconsideration. In: Elsner J, Huskinson J (eds) Life, Death and Representation: some new work on Roman sarcophagi. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 119–147Google Scholar
  25. Stefanidou-Tiveriou T (2012) Ranken-Sarkophage aus Nikopolis - eine Gruppe attischer Sarkophage mit römischem Einfluß. In: Koch G, Baratte F (eds) Akten des Symposiums “Sarkophage der Römischen Kaiserzeit: Produktion in den Zentren - Kopien in den Provinzen.” Verlag Franz Philipp Rutzen, Ruhpolding, Mainz, pp 151–160Google Scholar
  26. Stefanidou-Tiveriou T (2014a) Ἕκτορος λύτρα. Η σαρκοφάγος από τη Μονή της Αγ. Πελαγίας στην Πρέβεζα και τα αττικά της πρότυπα. In: Valavanis P, Manakidou E (eds) Ἒγραφσεν καὶ ἐποίεσεν. Μελέτες κεραμικής και εικονογραφίας προς τιμήν του καθηγητή Μιχάλη Τιβέριου. University Studio Press, Θεσσαλονίκη, pp 511–526Google Scholar
  27. Stefanidou-Tiveriou T (2009) Thasian marble: a connection between Thassos and Thessaloniki. In: Maniatis Y (ed) ASMOSIA VII, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Study of Marble and Other Stones in Antiquity. Ecole Française d’Athènes, Athens, pp 19–29Google Scholar
  28. Stefanidou-Tiveriou T (2014b) Die lokalen Sarkophage aus Thessaloniki. Verlag Franz Philipp Rutzen, RuhpoldingGoogle Scholar
  29. Stefanidou-Tiveriou T, Papagianni E (2015) Ανασκαφή Νικοπόλεως. Σαρκοφάγοι Αττικής και Τοπικής Παραγωγής. Η εν Αθήναις Αρχαιολογική Εταιρεία, ΑθήναιGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of ArchaeometryInstitute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, NCSR “Demokritos”Aghia ParaskeviGreece
  2. 2.Department of Archaeology and HistoryAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations