Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 467–476 | Cite as

Provenancing East Mediterranean cedar wood with the 87Sr/86Sr strontium isotope ratio

  • Sara Rich
  • Sturt W. Manning
  • Patrick Degryse
  • Frank Vanhaecke
  • Karel Van Lerberghe
Original Paper


87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios of cedar wood from forests in the East Mediterranean have been compiled in order to investigate the feasibility of provenancing archaeological cedar wood finds. Cedrus sp. forests furnished a great amount of wood in antiquity, for purposes ranging from ship to temple construction, and for fashioning cult statues and sarcophagi. The 87Sr/86Sr signatures of archaeological cedar samples may be compared with the preliminary dataset presented here to help determine the geographic origin of wooden artifacts. Sample sites include two forest areas in the Troodos Massif of Cyprus, five in the Lebanon, and two in Turkey’s Taurus Mountains. Sr ratios for wood varieties (i.e., early heartwood, late heartwood, sapwood, and twig wood) demonstrate relative uniformity between the xylem types frequently recovered from archaeological contexts. As such, this pilot study also assesses important issues of archaeological sampling and the geographical factors that influence Sr uptake in cedar trees of this region. While the regional signatures are distinct in most cases, small sample sizes and range overlap indicate the need for additional methods to make a case for a certain source forest. Alone, this method continues to be best used to disprove assumed wood provenances.


Cedrus sp Dendroprovenance East Mediterranean Strontium isotopes Timber trade 



This project is supported by the Aegean and Near Eastern Dendrochronology Project and the Department of Classics at Cornell University, and the Centre for Archaeological Sciences at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. Research support was also provided by the Central Africa Museum’s Laboratory of Wood Biology and Xylarium in Tervuren and the IAP VII Project: Greater Mesopotamia, Research of its Environment and History. Special thanks to the Belgian-American Educational Foundation and the Flemish Government’s Departement Onderwijs en Vorming for their generous financial support. We also thank the Cypriot Department of Forests for permission and assistance (in particular, Andreas Christou)—and especially the forestry officers at the Stavros tis Psokas station. Additional thanks are extended to Nabil Nemer at the Tannourine Cedars Forest Nature Reserve in Lebanon for his invaluable support, field and otherwise, in 2010. For lab analyses and data management, the authors thank Kris Latruwe (Ghent) and Dennis Braekmans (Leuven). At the Cornell Laboratory in 2009 and 2012, we especially thank Charlotte Pearson and Peter Brewer.


  1. Akkemik Ü (2003) Tree rings of Cedrus libani at the northern boundary of its natural distribution. IAWA J 24:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bachour I (2007) Soil profiles and soil analysis of the Ehden and Bcharry Cedar Forests, final report. American University of Beirut, BeirutGoogle Scholar
  3. Balcaen L, Moens L, Vanhaecke F (2010) Determination of isotope ratios of metals (and metalloids) by means of inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry for provenancing purposes: a review. Spectrochim Acta B At Spectrosc 65:769–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banner JL (2003) Radiogenic isotopes: systematics and applications to earth surface processes and chemical stratigraphy. Earth Sci Rev 65:141–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beals EW (1965) The remnant cedar forests of Lebanon. J Ecol 53:679–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boydak M (2003) Regeneration of Lebanon cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) on karstic lands in Turkey. For Ecol Manag 178:231–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dagher-Kharrat MB, Mariette S, Lefèvre F, Fady B, Grenier-de March G, Plomion C, Savouré A (2007) Geographical diversity and genetic relationships among Cedrus species estimated by AFLP. Tree Genet Genomes 3:275–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Degryse P, Schneider J (2008) Pliny the Elder and Sr-Nd isotopes: tracing the provenance of raw materials for Roman glass production. J Archaeol Sci 35:1993–2000Google Scholar
  9. Degryse P, Schneider J, Haack U, Lauwers V, Poblome J, Waelkens M, Muchez Ph (2006) Evidence for glass ‘recycling’ using Pb and Sr isotopic ratios and Sr-mixing lines: the case of early Byzantine Sagalassos. J Archaeol Sci 33:494–501Google Scholar
  10. Degryse P, Shortland A, De Muynck D, Van Heghe L, Scott R, Neyt B, Vanhaecke F (2010) Considerations on the provenance determination of plant ash glasses using strontium isotopes. J Archaeol Sci 37:3129–3135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drouet T, Herbauts J, Demaiffe D (2005) Long-term records of strontium isotopic composition in tree rings suggest changes in forest calcium sources in the early 20th century. Glob Chang Biol 11:1926–1940Google Scholar
  12. Durand SR, Shelley PH, Antweiler RC, Taylor HE (1999) Trees, chemistry, and prehistory in the American Southwest. J Archaeol Sci 26:185–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. English NB, Betancourt JL, Dean JS, Quade J (2001) Strontium isotopes reveal distant sources of architectural timber in Chaco Canyon, New Mexico. Proc Nat Acad Sci 98:11891–11896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evans JA, Montgomery J, Wildman G (2009) Isotope domain mapping of 87Sr/86Sr biospherevariation on the Isle of Skye, Scotland. J Geol Soc London 166:617–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evans JA, Montgomery J, Wildman G, Boulton N (2010) Spatial variations in biosphere 87Sr/86Sr in Britain. J Geol Soc London 167:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gosz JR, Moore DI (1989) Strontium isotope studies of atmospheric inputs to forested watersheds in New Mexico. Biogeochemistry 8:115–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Graustein WC, Armstrong RL (1983) The use of strontium-87/Strontium-86 ratios to measure atmospheric transport into forested watersheds. Science 219:289–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guéguen F, Stille P, Geagea ML, Perrone T, Chabaux F (2012a) Atmospheric pollution in an urban environment by tree bark biomonitoring – Part II: Sr, Nd and Pb isotopic tracing. Chemosphere 86:641–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guéguen F, Stille P, Dietze V, Gieré R (2012b) Chemical and isotopic properties and origin of course airborne particles collected by passive samplers in industrial, urban, and rural environments. Atmos Environ 62:631–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hajar L, François L, Khater C, Jomaa I, Déqué M, Cheddadi R (2010) Cedrus libani (A. Rich) distribution in Lebanon: past, present and future. C R Biol 333:622–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Horn P, Hölzl S, Todt W, Matthies D (1998) Isotope abundance ratios of Sr in wine provenance determinations, in a tree-root activity study, and of Pb in a pollution study on tree-rings. Isot Environ Health Stud 34:31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuniholm PI, Griggs CB, Newton MW (2007) Evidence for early timber trade in the Mediterranean. In: Belke K, Kisslinger EAK, Stassinopoulou MA (eds) ByzantinaMediterranea: Festschrift für Johannes Koderzum 65. Geburtstag, BöhlauVerlag, Vienna, pp 365–385Google Scholar
  23. Laffoon JE, Davies GR, Hoogland MLP, Hofman CL (2012) Spatial variation of biologically available strontium isotopes (87Sr/86Sr) in an archipelagic setting: a case study from the Caribbean. J Archaeol Sci 39:2371–2384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leonelli G, Battipaglia G, Siegwolf RTW, Saurer M, di Cella UM, Cherubini P, Pelfini M (2012) Climatic isotope signals in tree rings masked by air pollution: a case study conducted along the Mont Blanc Tunnel access road (Western Alps, Italy). Atmos Environ 61:169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lev-Yadun S (2008) Wood remains from archaeological excavations: a review with a Near Eastern perspective. Isr J Earth Sci 56:139–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meiggs R (1982) Treesand timber in the ancient Mediterranean world. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Pollard AM (2011) Isotopes and impact: a cautionary tale. Antiquity 85:631–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pollard AM, Heron C (2008) Archaeological chemistry. RSC, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Poole I, Braadbaart F, Boon JJ, van Bergen PF (2002) Stable carbon isotope changes during artificial charring of propagules. Org Geochem 33:1675–1681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Poszwa A, Ferry B, Dambrine E, Pollier B, Wickman T, Loubet M, Bishop K (2004) Variations of bioavailable Sr concentration and 87Sr/86Sr ratio in boreal forest ecosystems. Role of biocycling, mineral weathering and depth of root uptake. Biogeochemistry 67:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Price TD, Burton JH, Bentley RA (2002) The characterization of biologically available strontium isotope ratios for the study of prehistoric migration. Archaeometry 44:117–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Prohaska T, Stadlbauer C, Wimmer R, Stingeder G, Latkoczy C, Hoffmann E, Stephanowitz H (1998) Investigation of element variablity in tree rings of young Norway spruce by laser-ablation-ICPMS. Sci Total Environ 219:29–39Google Scholar
  33. Reynolds AC, Betancourt JL, Quade J, Patchett PJ, Dean JS, Stein J (2005) 87Sr/86Sr sourcing of Ponderosa pine used in Anasazi Great House construction at Chaco Canyon, NM. J Archaeol Sci 32:1061–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rich SA, Manning SW, Degryse P, Vanhaecke F, Van Lerberghe K (2012) Tree-ring and strontium isotope signatures of Cedrus brevifolia in Cyprus. J Anal At Spectrom 27:796–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rogers SO, Kaya Z (2006) DNA from ancient cedar wood from King Midas’ tomb, Turkey, and Al-Aksa mosque, Israel. Sylvae Genet 55:54–62Google Scholar
  36. Slovak NM, Paytan A (2011) Applications of Sr isotopes in archaeology. In: Baskaran M (ed) Handbook of environmental isotope geochemistry. Springer, Berlin, pp 743–768Google Scholar
  37. Vanhaecke F, Balcaen L, Malinovsky D (2009) Use of single-collector and multi-collector ICP-mass spectrometry for isotopic analysis. J Anal At Spectrom 24:863–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Watmough SA, Hutchinson TC (1996) Analysis of tree rings using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry to record fluctuations in a metal pollution episode. J Environ Pollut 93:93–102Google Scholar
  39. Wilson L, Pollard AM (2002) Here today, gone tomorrow. Integrated experimentation and geochemical modeling in studies of archaeological diagenetic change. Acc Chem Res 35:644–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara Rich
    • 1
  • Sturt W. Manning
    • 2
  • Patrick Degryse
    • 3
  • Frank Vanhaecke
    • 4
  • Karel Van Lerberghe
    • 1
  1. 1.Near Eastern StudiesKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Malcolm and Carolyn Wiener Laboratory for Aegean and Near Eastern DendrochronologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  3. 3.Section Geology, Centre for Archaeological SciencesKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  4. 4.Department of Analytical ChemistryGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations