Advertisement

Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 487–504 | Cite as

Lidar data and the Izapa polity: new results and methodological issues from tropical Mesoamerica

  • Robert M. RosenswigEmail author
  • Ricardo López-Torrijos
  • Caroline E. Antonelli
Original Paper

Abstract

Light detection and ranging (lidar) and pedestrian survey are employed to document regional settlement patterns associated with the well-known center of Izapa in Chiapas, Mexico. Within an area of 47.5 km2, we located 413 previously undocumented mounds with associated time diagnostic artifacts. These mounds are the remains of both monumental architecture defining regional centers as well as domestic house mounds. This paper presents new data of overall occupation levels from the low hills zone that complements previously published patterns from the piedmont surrounding Izapa as well as eight newly documented Middle and Late Formative period (850 cal. bcad 100) monumental centers of various sizes that are coeval with Izapa. In addition to these substantive archaeological findings, the efficacy of lidar data acquired from two environmental zones (low hills and piedmont) are compared to evaluate how well Prehispanic mounds were detected under different vegetation covers. We conclude that the lower density of lidar collection from the low hills zone was as effective at detecting archaeological mounds as the higher density collection campaign used in the piedmont zone. The implication of these findings is that higher-density collection strategies may not always improve the documentation of archaeological features.

Keywords

Izapa Lidar Settlement survey Mesoamerica 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding for this survey was provided by a National Science Foundation, senior research grant (BCS-0947787). Additional funding was provided by a UAlbany, College of Arts & Science Faculty Research Award Program grant and the UAlbany Center for Social and Demographic Analysis (CSDA) supported by NICHD (R24-HD044943). Special thanks to Linda Lawrence and Chip Ensel at CSDA for all their help. Permission to undertake this field work in Chiapas was granted by the INAH Consejo de Arqueología as well as landowners in the Municipios of Frontera Hidalgo and Tuxtla Chico. Helpful suggestions were provided by Payson Sheets and an anonymous reviewer.

Supplementary material

12520_2014_210_Fig12_ESM.gif (478 kb)
Supplemental Fig. S1

(GIF 478 kb)

12520_2014_210_MOESM1_ESM.tif (15.3 mb)
High-resolution image (TIFF 15651 kb)
12520_2014_210_Fig13_ESM.gif (288 kb)
Supplemental Fig. S2

(GIF 287 kb)

12520_2014_210_MOESM2_ESM.tif (14.7 mb)
High-resolution image (TIFF 15047 kb)
12520_2014_210_MOESM3_ESM.xls (255 kb)
Supplemental Table 1 (XLS 255 kb)
12520_2014_210_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (33 kb)
Supplemental Table 2 (XLSX 33.3 kb)

References

  1. Ashmore W (1981) Some issues of method and theory in lowland Maya settlement archaeology. In: Ashmore W (ed) Lowland Maya settlement patterns. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp 37–69Google Scholar
  2. Balkansky AK (2006) Surveys and Mesoamerican archaeology: the emerging macroregional paradigm. J Archaeol Res 14:53–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banning EB (2002) Archaeological survey. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernardini F, Sgambati A, Montagnari Kokelj M, Zaccaria C, Micheli R, Fragiacomo A, Tiussi C, Dreossi D, Tuniz C, De Min A (2013) Airborne LiDAR application to karstic areas: the example of Trieste province (north-eastern Italy) from prehistoric sites to Roman forts. J Archaeol Sci 40:2152–2160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Billman BR, Feinman GM (1999) Settlement pattern studies in the Americas: fifty years since viru. Smithsonian Institution Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. Blake M, Rosenswig RM, Waber N (2013) Architectural orientations at Izapa: lidar mapping reveals the dual roles of Tacaná volcano and winter solstice sunrise during the Formative period. Paper presented at the Canadian Archeological Association Meeting, WhistlerGoogle Scholar
  7. Bollandsås OM, Risbøl O, Ene LT, Nesbakken A, Gobakken T, Næsset E (2012) Using airborne small-footprint laser scanner data for detection of cultural remains in forests: an experimental study of the effects of pulse density and DTM smoothing. J Archaeol Sci 39:2733–2743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Challis K, Kokalj Z, Kincey M, Moscrop D, Howard AJ (2008) Airborne lidar and historic environment records. Antiquity 82:1055–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Challis K, Carey C, Kincey M, Howard AJ (2011) Airborne lidar intensity and geoarchaeological prospection in river valley floors. Archaeol Prospect 18:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chase AF, Chase DZ, Weishampel JF, Drake JB, Shrestha RL, Clint Slatton K, Awe JJ, Carter WE (2011) Airborne LiDAR, archaeology, and the ancient Maya landscape at Caracol, Belize. J Archaeol Sci 38:387–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chase AF, Chase DZ, Fisher CT, Leisz SL, Weishampel JF (2012) Geospatial revolution and remote sensing LiDAR in Mesoamerican archaeology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:12916–12921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deveraux BJ, Amable GS, Crow P, Cliff AD (2005) The potential of airborne lidar for the detection of archaeological features under woodland canopies. Antiquity 79:648–60Google Scholar
  13. Doneus M, Briese C, Fera M, Janner M (2008) Archaeological prospection of forested areas using full-waveform airborne laser scanning. J Archaeol Sci 35:882–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ekholm SM (1969) Mound 30a and the preclassic ceramic sequence of Izapa, Chiapas, Mexico. Papers, new world archaeological foundation 25. Brigham Young University, ProvoGoogle Scholar
  15. Evans DH, Fletcher RJ, Pottier C et al (2013) Uncovering archaeological landscapes at Angkor using lidar. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:12595–12600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher CT, Leisz SJ, Outlaw G (2011) LiDAR—a valuable tool uncovers an ancient city in Mexico. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 77:962–967Google Scholar
  17. Graham L (2013) LIDAR best practices: part IV—initial classification of ground. LiDAR News. Available at: http://www.lidarnews.com/content/view/8931/136/. Accessed 27 September 2013]
  18. Höfle B, Pfeifer N (2007) Correction of laser scanning intensity data: data and model-driven approaches. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 62:415–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnston KJ (2002) Protrusion, bioturbation, and settlement detection during surface survey: the lowland Maya case. J Archaeol Method Theory 9:1–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnston KJ (2004) The ‘Invisible’ Maya: minimally mounded residential settlement at Itzán, Petén, Guatemala. Lat Am Antiq 15:145–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kanter J (2008) The archaeology of regions: from discrete analytical toolkit to ubiquitous spatial perspective. J Archaeol Res 16:37–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kokalj Z, Zaksek K, Ostir K (2011) Application of sky-view factor for the visualization of historic landscape features in lidar-derived relief models. Antiquity 85:263–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kowalewski SA (2008) Regional settlement pattern studies. J Archaeol Res 16:225–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Love MW (2002) Early complex society in Pacific Guatemala: settlements and chronology of the Rio Naranjo, Guatemala. Papers, new world archaeological foundation 66. Brigham Young University, ProvoGoogle Scholar
  25. Love MW (2007) Recent research in the southern highlands and Pacific coast of Mesoamerica. J Archaeol Res 15:275–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Love MW (2011) City states and city-state culture in the southern Maya region. In: Love M, Kaplan J (eds) Southern Maya in the Late Preclassic: the rise and fall of an early Mesoamerican civilization. Colorado University Press, Boulder, pp 47–76Google Scholar
  27. Love MW, Guernsey J (2007) Monument 3 from La Blanca, Guatemala: a Middle Preclassic earthen sculpture and its ritual associations. Antiquity 81:920–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Love MW, Guernsey J (2011) La Blanca and the Soconusco Middle Formative. In: Lesure R (ed) Sociopolitical transformation in early Mesoamerica: Archaic to Formative in the Soconusco region. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 170–188Google Scholar
  29. Lowe GW, Lee TA Jr, Espinoza EM (1982) Izapa: an introduction to the ruins and monuments. Papers, new world archaeological foundation 31. Brigham Young University, ProvoGoogle Scholar
  30. Lowe GW, Ekholm SM, Clark JE (2013) Middle and late preclassic Izapa: ceramic complexes and history. Papers, new world archaeological foundation 75. Brigham Young University, ProvoGoogle Scholar
  31. Macías JL, Espíndola JM, García-Palomo A, Scott KM, Hughes S, Mora JC (2000) Late Holocene Peléan-style eruption at Tacaná volcano, Mexico and Guatemala: past, present, and future hazards. Geol Soc Am Bull 112:1234–1249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCoy MD, Asner GP, Graves MW (2011) Airborne lidar survey of irrigated agricultural landscapes: an application of the slope contrast method. J Archaeol Sci 38:2141–2154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Neff H, Pearsall DM, Jones JG, Arroyo B, Freidel DE (2006) Climate change and population history in the Pacific lowlands of southern Mesoamerica. Quat Res 65:390–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pyburn KA (1989) Prehistoric Maya community and settlement at Nohmul, Belize. BAR international series 509. Tempvs Reparatvm, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. Randall AR (2014) LiDAR-aided reconnaissance and reconstruction of lost landscapes: an example of freshwater shell mounds (ca. 7500–500 cal b.p.) in northeastern Florida. J Field Archaeol 39:162–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Renslow MS (2012) Airborne topographic lidar manual. American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  37. Rosenswig RM (2008) Prehispanic settlement in the Cuauhtémoc region of the Soconusco, Chiapas, Mexico. J Field Archaeol 33:389–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rosenswig RM (2010) The beginnings of Mesoamerican civilization: inter-regional interaction and the Olmec. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Rosenswig RM (2012a) Southern Pacific coastal region of Mesoamerica: a corridor of interaction from Olmec to Aztec times. In: Nichols DL, Pool CA (eds) Oxford handbook of Mesoamerican archaeology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 419–433Google Scholar
  40. Rosenswig RM (2012b) Materialism, mode of production and a millennium of change in southern Mexico. J Archaeol Method Theory 19:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosenswig RM (2012c) Agriculture and monumentality in the Soconusco region of Chiapas, Mexico. In: Burger RL, Rosenswig RM (eds) Early new world monumentality. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, pp 111–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rosenswig RM, López-Torrijos R, Antonelli CE, Mendelsohn RR (2013) Lidar mapping and surface survey of the Izapa state on the tropical piedmont of Chiapas, Mexico. J Archaeol Sci 40:1493–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rosenswig RM, Auclair A, Antonelli CE, Mendelsohn RR, Nunez-Cortes Y, Vidal-Guzman C (2014) Proyecto de Reconocimiento Regional de Izapa 2012: Informe Técnicos Parciales. Report Submitted to the Consejo de Arqueologia, INAH, Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
  44. Santley RS (1990) Demographic archaeology in the Maya lowlands. In: Culbert TP, Rice DS (eds) Precolumbian population history in the Maya lowlands. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp 325–343Google Scholar
  45. Stular B, Kokalj Z, Ostir K, Nuninger L (2012) Visualization of lidar-derived relief models for detection of archaeological features. J Archaeol Sci 39:3354–3360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Verhagen P, Dragut L (2012) Object-based landform delineation and classification from DEMs for archaeological predictive mapping. J Archaeol Sci 39:698–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Voorhies B (1989) Settlement patterns in the western Soconusco: methods of site recovery and dating results. In: Bove F, Heller L (eds) New frontiers in the archaeology of the Pacific coast of southern Mesoamerica. Anthropological Research Papers No. 39. Arizona State University, Tempe, pp 103–124Google Scholar
  48. Voorhies B, Gasco J (2004) Postclassic Soconusco society: the late prehistory of the coast of Chiapas, Mexico. Monograph, Institute of Mesoamerican Studies 14. University at Albany, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  49. Voorhies B, Gasco J, Cackler P (2011) Prehistoric settlement in the South Pacific coast of Chiapas, Mexico. Papers, New World Archaeological Foundation 71. Brigham Young University, ProvoGoogle Scholar
  50. Yoon J, Shin I, Lee KS (2008) Land cover characteristics of airborne LiDAR intensity data: a case study. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 5:801–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert M. Rosenswig
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ricardo López-Torrijos
    • 2
  • Caroline E. Antonelli
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity at Albany-SUNYAlbanyUSA
  2. 2.CasaAlba ConsultingAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations