Advertisement

Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 151–156 | Cite as

The use of magnetometry and pole-dipole resistivity for locating Nabataean Hawar archeological site in the SW-Jordan

  • Awni T. BataynehEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper is focused on the joint use of magnetometry and pole-dipole electrical resistivity geophysical methods for assessing their capability in the detection of a prehistoric site in the southwestern Jordan. The survey area, Auara, was built in the first century BC during the Nabataean time and is located in a very arid environment framed on the east and north by white sandstone hills. In order to test this site, a number of magnetic stations and two pole-dipole resistivity traverses were carried out in the investigated area. Magnetic data were taken with one sensor at height of 0.8 m along survey lines spaced 1 m apart. Resistivity measurements were carried out utilizing the pole-dipole array along two profiles. A total of 32 geoelectrical stations spaced 2 m were made along the two profiles. Magnetic method found structure with contrasting physical properties to those of the surrounding material. The archeological interpretation of such structure is in terms of rectangular cistern (pool) with dimensions 26 × 16 m. A probable location of two buried walls spaced 16 m are indicated by low resistivity values.

Keywords

Magnetometry Pole-dipole resistivity Archeological investigation Jordan 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank Prof. M. Mukhopadhyay from the Department of Geology and Geophysics and two anonymous reviewers for comments that greatly improved this manuscript. Facilities provided by the Department of Geology and Geophysics, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia are acknowledged.

References

  1. Batayneh A, Al-Zoubi A (2000) Detection of a solution cavity adjacent to a highway in southwest Jordan using electrical resistivity methods. J Environ Eng Geophys 5:25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batayneh A, Barjous M (2003) A case study of dipole-dipole resistivity for geotechnical engineering from Ras en Naqab area, south Jordan. J Environ Eng Geophys 8:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batayneh A, Haddadin G, Toubasi U (1999) Using the head-on resistivity method for shallow rock fracture investigations, Ajlun, Jordan. J Environ Eng Geophys 4:179–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batayneh A, Al-Zoubi A, Tobasi U, Haddadin G (2001) Evaluation of archaeological site potential on the Tall al-Kharrar area (Jordan) using magnetic and electrical resistivity methods. Environmental Geology 41:54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Batayneh A, Khataibeh J, Alrshdan H, Tobasi U, Al-Jahed N (2007) The use of microgravity, magnetometry and resistivity surveys for the characterization and preservation of an archaeological site at Umm er-Rasas, Jordan. Archaeol Prospect 14:60–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bevan B (1994) The magnetic anomaly of a brick foundation. Archaeol Prospect 1:93–104Google Scholar
  7. Clark A, Tarling D, Noel M (1988) Developments in archaeomagnetic dating in Britain. J Archaeol Sci 15:645–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crew P (2002) Magnetic mapping and dating of prehistoric and medieval iron-working sites in northwest Wales. Archaeol Prospect 9:163–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crowther J, Barker P (1995) Magnetic susceptibility: distinguishing anthropogenic effects from the natural. Archaeol Prospect 2:207–216Google Scholar
  10. Dutta N, Bose R, Saikia B (1970) Detection of solution channels in limestone by electrical resistivity method. Geophys Prospect 18:405–414Google Scholar
  11. Eadie J, Oleson JP (1986) The water-supply systems of Nabataean and Roman Humayma. Bull Am Sch Orient Res 262:49–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Geometrics, 1995, G-858 MagMapper operation manual: Geometrics Inc., Sunnydale, California.Google Scholar
  13. Gibson T (1986) Magnetic prospection on prehistoric sites in Western Canada. Geophysics 51:553–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graf D (1979) A preliminary report on a survey of Nabataean-Roman military sites in southern Jordan. Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan 23:121–127Google Scholar
  15. Herbich T (2003) Archaeological geophysics in Egypt: the Polish contribution. Archaeol Pol 41:13–56Google Scholar
  16. Hus J, Ech-Chakrouni S, Joranova D, Geeraerts R (2003) Archaeomagnetic investigation of two mediaeval brick constructions in north Belgium and the magnetic anisotropy of bricks. Geoarchaeology 18:225–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kovacheva M, Hedley I, Jordanova N, Kostadinova M, Gigov V (2004) Archaeomagnetic dating of archaeological sites from Switzerland and Bulgaria. J Archaeol Sci 31:1463–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morgan F, Shi W, Vichabian Y, Sogade J, Rodi W (1999) Resistivity in cave exploration. In: Proceeding of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems. The Annual Meeting of the Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society (SAGEEP 1999), Oakland, CA, 303–308Google Scholar
  19. Oleson J (1992) The water-supply system of ancient Auara: preliminary results of the Al Hummaymeh hydraulic survey. Studies in the history and archeology of Jordan 4:269–275Google Scholar
  20. Oleson J (1997) Landscape and cityscape in the Hisma: the resources of ancient Al Hummaymeh. Studies in the history and archeology of Jordan 6:175–188Google Scholar
  21. Pattantyus-A M (1986) Geophysical results in archaeology in Hungary. Geophysics 51:561–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Scollar I, Tabbagh A, Hesse A, Herzog I (1990) Archeological prospecting and remote sensing. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Tite M, Mullins C (1971) Enhancement of the magnetic susceptibility of soils on archaeological sites. Archaeometry 13:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Weston D (2004) The influence of waterlogging and variations in pedology and ignition upon resultant susceptibilities: a series of laboratory reconstructions. Archaeol Prospect 11:107–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geology and GeophysicsKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations