Advertisement

Comparison of decision-making in neonatal care between China and Japan

  • Hidehiko MaruyamaEmail author
  • Yuka Shibata
  • Xing-Ge Xia
  • Yun-Xia Sun
  • Shao-Ru He
  • Yushi Ito
Original Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Various differences between China and Japan in approaches to medical treatment have been noted, but a few studies have examined differences in medical decision-making, especially in neonatal care. The aim of this study was to clarify these differences by means of a questionnaire.

Methods

The subjects were physicians on the staff of NICUs in China and Japan. The study questionnaire consisted of three parts dealing with the general characteristics of the participants, questions about treatment strategies for hypothetical, critically ill infants, and general questions about the treatment of foreign patients. The Likert scale was used to assess the treatment strategies and the results were analyzed statistically. Subgroup analysis by age, sex, and medical and NICU experience was also performed.

Results

The proportion of respondents in the Chinese and Japanese groups was 26/26 (100%) and 26/31 (84%), respectively. There was a significant difference between the Chinese and Japanese groups for 8 of 75 questions; Chinese physicians chose the positive treatment or examination options for these eight questions unlike their Japanese counterparts. The responses of the younger, less experienced physicians in both countries were more similar to each other, and more positive than those of their older, more experienced colleagues.

Conclusion

Chinese physicians showed a more positive attitude toward examination and treatment, whereas Japanese physicians showed a more cautious attitude.

Keywords

Behavioral style China Decision-making Directive style Japan 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants for responding to the questionnaire. We also thank Mr. James R. Valera for his assistance with editing this manuscript.

Authors contribution

HM conceived this study, constructed the questionnaire, analyzed the data, and wrote the first draft. YukS, XX, YunS, and SH helped to construct the questionnaire. YI supervised the study.

Funding

None declared

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

This research was approved by the ethical review board of the National Center for Child Health and Development and Guangdong General Hospital.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

References

  1. 1.
    Hofstede G. Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. London: Sage Publications; 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hofstede G. Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Beverly Hils: Sage Publications; 1980. p. 475.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martinsons MG, Davison RM. Strategic decision making and support systems: comparing American, Japanese and Chinese management. Decis Support Syst. 2007;43:284–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rowe AJ, Boulgarides JD. Decision styles-a perspective. Leadersh Org Dev J. 1983;4:3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fu R, Noguchi H. Does marriage make us healthier? Inter-country comparative evidence from China, Japan, and Korea. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0148990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu S, Liu C, Cao X, Shang B, Chen A, Liu B. The difference in the attitude of Chinese and Japanese college students regarding deceased organ donation. Transpl Proc. 2013;45:2098–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Park HL, Lee HS, Shin BC, Liu JP, Shang Q, Yamashita H, et al. Traditional medicine in china, Korea, and Japan: a brief introduction and comparison. Evid Based Complement Altern Med. 2012;2012:429103.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhao LB, Miyachi S, Shi HB, Suh DC. Comparison of medical education and requirements for training in the interventional neuroradiology in China, Japan and Korea. Neurointervention. 2013;8:3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haug S, Goldstein M, Cummins D, Fayard E, Merritt TA. Using patient-centered care after a prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 18 or trisomy 13: a review. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171:382–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang ZQ, Zhong Y, Huang XM, Du LZ. Airway administration of corticosteroids for prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in premature infants: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. BMC Pulm Med. 2017;17:207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sohn B, Park S, Park IK, Kim YT, Park JD, Park SH, et al. Lung volume reduction surgery for respiratory failure in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatrics. 2018;141:S395–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Volbers B, Herrmann S, Willfarth W, Lucking H, Kloska SP, Doerfler A, et al. Impact of hypothermia initiation and duration on perihemorrhagic edema evolution after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2016;47:2249–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kieling CO, Hallal C, Spessato CO, Ribeiro LM, Breyer H, Goldani HA, et al. Changing pattern of indications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children and adolescents: a twelve-year experience. World J Pediatr. 2015;11:154–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khairullar DH, Khairullar ZY. Cultural values and decision-making in China. Int J Bus Humanit Technol. 2013;3:1–11.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gutierrez SM, Mizota T, Rakue Y. Comparison of four health systems: Cuba, China, Japan and the USA, an approach to reality. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2003;34:937–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Neonatology, Center for Maternal-Fetal, Neonatal and Reproductive MedicineNational Center for Child Health and DevelopmentTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Division of NICUGuangdong General Hospital Guangdong Academy of Medical SciencesGuangdongChina

Personalised recommendations