Advertisement

World Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 607–614 | Cite as

Citation classics in pediatrics: a bibliometric analysis

  • Viswas ChhapolaEmail author
  • Soumya Tiwari
  • Bobbity Deepthi
  • Sandeep Kumar Kanwal
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Citation analysis provides insights into the history and developmental trajectory of scientific fields. Our objective was to perform an analysis of citation classics in the journals of pediatric specialty and to examine their characteristics.

Methods

Initially, all the journals listed under the category of pediatrics (n = 120) were identified using Journal Citation Reports. Web of science database was then searched (1950–2016) to select the top-100 cited articles in the above identified pediatric journals. The top-100 cited article were categorized according the study design, sub-specialty, country, institutional affiliation, and language.

Results

The top-100 articles were published in 18 different journals, with Pediatrics having the highest numbers (n = 40), followed by The Journal of Pediatrics (n = 17). The majority (n = 62) of classics were published after 1990. The most cited article had citation count of 3516 and the least cited had a citation count of 593. The USA (n = 71) was the most commonly represented country, and 60 institutions contributed to 100 articles. Fifteen authors contributed to more than one classic as first or second author. Observational study (n = 55) was the commonest study design across all decades, followed by reviews (n = 12), scale development studies (n = 11), and guidelines (n = 11). Among the pediatric sub-specialties, growth and development articles were highly cited (n = 24), followed by pediatric psychiatry and behavior (n = 21), endocrinology (n = 15), and neonatology (n = 12).

Conclusions

The top-100 cited articles in pediatrics identify the impactful authors, journals, institutes, and countries. Observational study design was predominant—implying that inclusion among citation classics is not related to soundness of study design.

Keywords

Bibliometrics Citation analysis Citation count Publishing/trends Scientometrics 

Notes

Author contributions

VC contributed to the study conceptualization and design, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, and prepared the first draft of the manuscript. ST contributed to the study conceptualization and design, and acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data. BD contributed to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data. SKK contributed to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

None received.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

Not required.

Conflict of interest

No financial or nonfinancial benefits have been received or will be received from any party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Supplementary material

12519_2018_146_MOESM1_ESM.docx (49 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 49 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Garfield E. Citation indexes to science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science. 1955;122:108–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Casadevall A, Fang FC. Impacted science: impact is not importance. MBio. 2015;6:e01593-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garfield E. What is a citation classic? http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/. Accessed Jan 5 2017.
  4. 4.
    Garfield E. Introducing citation classics: the human side of scientific reports. Curr Contents. 1977;1:5–7.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Merton RK. The Matthew effect in science. 2. Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. ISIS. 1988;79:285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ponce FA, Lozano AM. Highly cited works in neurosurgery. Part II: the citation classics. J Neurosurg. 2010;112:233–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ibrahim GM, Snead OC 3rd, Rutka JT, Lozano AM. The most cited works in epilepsy: Trends in the “Citation Classics”. Epilepsia. 2012;53:765–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cassar Gheiti AJ, Downey RE, Byrne DP, Molony DC, Mulhall KJ. The 25 most cited articles in arthroscopic orthopaedic surgery. Arthroscopy. 2012;28:548–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahmad SS, Ahmad SS, Kohl S, Ahmad S, Ahmed AR. The hundred most cited articles in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25:900–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brandt JS, Downing AC, Howard DL, Kofinas JD, Chasen ST. Citation classics in obstetrics and gynecology: the 100 most frequently cited journal articles in the last 50 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:355.e1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li Z, Wu FX, Yang LQ, Sun YM, Lu ZJ, Yu WF. Citation classics in main pain research journals. J Anesth. 2012;26:85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Levitt JM, Thelwall M. The most highly cited library and information science articles: interdisciplinarity, first authors and citation patterns. Scientometrics. 2009;78:45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stack S. Citation classics in suicide and life threatening behavior: a research note. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2012;42:628–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nowrouzi-Kia B, Chidu C, Carter L, McDougall A, Casole J. The top cited articles in occupational therapy: a citation analysis study. Scand J Occup Ther. 2018;25:15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim JE, Park KM, Kim Y, Yoon DY, Bae JS. Citation classics in central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating disease. Brain Behav. 2017;7:e00700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Celayir S, Sander S, Elicevik M, Vural A, Celayir AC. The most commonly cited articles in pediatric surgical journals. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2008;18:160–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wilcox MA, Khan NR, McAbee JH, Boop FA, Klimo P Jr. Highly cited publications in pediatric neurosurgery. Childs Nerv Syst. 2013;29:2201–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Varghese RA, Dhawale AA, Zavaglia BC, Slobogean BL, Mulpuri K. Citation classics in pediatric orthopaedics. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33:667–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McDowell DT, Hyland EJ, Harvey JG, Holland AJ. Pediatric burns research: a history or an evolution? Burns. 2015;41:1556–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McDowell DT, Darani A, Shun A, Thomas G, Holland AJA. A bibliometric analysis of pediatric liver transplantation publications. Pediatr Transplant. 2017;21.  https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.12913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Waseem M, Uffer H, Josephson E. An audit of top citations published in pediatric emergency care. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016;32:279–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Quinn N, Hensey O, McDowell DT. A historical perspective of pediatric publications: a bibliometric analysis. Pediatrics. 2013;132:406–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Definition of classic in English. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/classic. Accessed 5 Jan 2017.
  24. 24.
    Allen L, Jones C, Dolby K, Lynn D, Walport M. Looking for landmarks: the role of expert review and bibliometric analysis in evaluating scientific publication outputs. PLoS ONE. 2009;18:e5910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brahler E, Strauss B. Evergreens and newcomers: citation classics and citation hits. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2006;56:457–9 (in German).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Merton RK. Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press; 1968. p. 25–38.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    van Raan AFJ. Sleeping beauties in science. Scientometrics. 2004;59:467–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Završnik J, Kokol P. Sleeping beauties in pediatrics. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104:313–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Garfield E. Bradford’s law and related statistical patterns. Essays Inf Sci. 1980;4:476–83.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Callaham M, Wears RL, Weber E. Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA. 2002;287:2847–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Garfield E. The significant scientific literature appears in a small core of journals. Scientist. 1996;10:14–6.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Garfield E. Do Nobel prize winners write citation classics? Essays Inf Sci. 1986;9:182–7.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Merton R. The Matthew effect in science: the reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science. 1968;159:56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ernst E, Kienbacher T. Chauvinism. Nature. 1991;352:560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Grange RI. National bias in citations in urology journals: parochialism or availability? BJU Int. 1999;84:601–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fenton JE, O’Connor A, Ullah I, Ahmed I, Shaikh M. Do citation classics in rhinology reflect utility rather than quality? Rhinology. 2005;43:221–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Merton RK. On the shoulders of giants: a shandean postscript: the post-Italianate edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1993.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Richmond JB. Child development: a basic science for pediatrics. Pediatrics. 1967;39:649–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Graham PJ. Paediatrics and child psychiatry: past, present and future. Acta Paediatr. 1994;83:880–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vidyasagar D. “Half a Century of Evolution of Neonatology: A Witness's Story” : Dr. K. C. Chaudhuri Lifetime Achievement Award Oration Delivered at AIIMS, New Delhi on 7th September 2014. Indian J Pediatr. 2015;82:1117–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Martınez MA, Herrera M, López-Gijón J, Herrera-Viedma E. H-classics: characterizing the concept of citation classics through H-index. Scientometrics. 2014;98:1971–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kulkarni AV, Aziz B, Shams I, Busse JW. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA. 2009;302:1092–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Catalini C, Lacetera N, Oettl A. The incidence and role of negative citations in science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:13823–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Viswas Chhapola
    • 1
    Email author
  • Soumya Tiwari
    • 1
  • Bobbity Deepthi
    • 1
  • Sandeep Kumar Kanwal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PediatricsKalawati Saran Children’s Hospital & Lady Hardinge Medical CollegeNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations