Advertisement

Applied Geomatics

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 53–68 | Cite as

SEH-SDB: a semantically enriched historical spatial database for documentation and preservation of monumental heritage based on CityGML

  • Reda YaagoubiEmail author
  • Abdulkader Al-Gilani
  • Ahmad Baik
  • Ebraheem Alhomodi
  • Yehia MikyEmail author
Original Paper
  • 142 Downloads

Abstract

Cultural heritage has a great and inestimable value for communities. Unfortunately, several historical monuments are under deteriorating conditions mainly due to the lack of knowledge about their historical importance. Hence, it is necessary to provide efficient solutions to preserve these monuments. An effective approach for the preservation of cultural heritage should address two main aspects: documentation and information. The first aspect is related to methods that are used to document and digitally archive historic buildings by using appropriate materials and techniques for acquiring 3D spatial data. The second aspect aims to inform the population and policy makers about the importance of the historical heritage in a simple, effective, and interactive manner. In this paper, we propose an original approach to design a semantically enriched historical spatial database (SEH-SDB) for documentation and information of monumental heritage. First of all, a LiDAR acquisition of the historical heritage should be undertaken to capture its current condition. Then, the SEH-SDB database will be designed according to four semantic packages related to historical buildings that are (1) Components package, (2) Material package, (3) Historical package, and (4) Social package. The component package is based on the CityGML standard, which ensures a high interoperability for 3D models. The material package represents the material used in the construction of the building (wood, stone …). The historical package informs about historical elements that characterize the building and its temporal evolution. The social package aims to inform about the main social activities that may take place in the historical building. Based on the SEH-SDB, a 3D historical GIS is developed to provide rich semantic information about historical sites. At the end of this paper, a case study of a historical monument named “Ribat Banajah” in Jeddah Historical City in Saudi Arabia is presented. A digital archiving of the current state of this building is performed by using terrestrial LiDAR in combination with other classical surveying techniques (traversing, leveling, and GPS). Then, a building information model of this building is created and exported to the 3D HGIS designed for the documentation of historical buildings.

Keywords

Semantics Historical building 3D Historical GIS BIM Terrestrial LiDAR 

References

  1. Avrami E, Mason R, & De la Torre M, (2000). Values and heritage conservation. S. Tidwell (Ed.) Los Angeles, USA: The Getty Conservation InstituteGoogle Scholar
  2. Baik A, Alitany A, Boehm J, Robson S (2014) Jeddah historical building information modelling. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 1:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baik A, Yaagoubi R, Boehm J (2015) Integration of Jeddah historical BIM and 3D GIS for documentation and restoration of historical monument. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 40(5):29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bogdanova GT, & Atanasova V (2013). Digitisation and presentation of historical materials in a virtual exhibition ‘The Image of India in Bulgaria: from the late 19th to the late 20th Cen. Digital Presentation and Preservation of Cultural and Scientific Heritage, (III), 212–218Google Scholar
  5. Brilakis I, Lourakis M, Sacks R, Savarese S, Christodoulou S, Teizer J, Makhmalbaf A (2010) Toward automated generation of parametric BIMs based on hybrid video and laser scanning data. Adv Eng Inform 24(4):456–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chee Wei O, Siew Chin C, Majid Z, Setan H (2010) 3D documentation and preservation of historical monument using terrestrial laser scanning. Geoinformation Science Journal 10(1):73–90Google Scholar
  7. Costamagna, E., & Spanò, A. (2013). CityGML for architectural heritage. In Developments in multidimensional spatial data models, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, (pp. 219–237)Google Scholar
  8. De Luca L, Busayarat C, Stefani C, Véron P, Florenzano M (2011) A semantic-based platform for the digital analysis of architectural heritage. Comput Graph 35(2):227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Luca L, Véron P, Florenzano M (2006) Reverse engineering of architectural buildings based on a hybrid modeling approach. Comput Graph 30(2):160–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Luca L, Véron P, Florenzano M (2007) A generic formalism for the semantic modeling and representation of architectural elements. Vis Comput 23(3):181–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Di Mascio, D., Pauwels, P., & De Meyer, R. (2013). Improving the knowledge and management of the historical built environment with BIM and ontologies: the case study of the book tower. In 13th International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality (pp. 427–436)Google Scholar
  12. Dore, C., & Murphy, M. (2012, September). Integration of historic building information modeling (HBIM) and 3D GIS for recording and managing cultural heritage sites. In Virtual systems and multimedia (VSMM), 2012 18th International Conference on (pp. 369–376). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  13. Gröger G, Kolbe TH, Nagel C, & Häfele KH (2012). Open geospatial consortium OGC city geography markup language (CityGML) en-coding standard. OGC 12–019, Version 2., p. 344Google Scholar
  14. Haddad NA (2011) From ground surveying to 3D laser scanner: a review of techniques used for spatial documentation of historic sites. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences 23(2):109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hichri N, Stefani C, De Luca L, Veron P (2013) Review of the ‘As-Built BIM’ approaches. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XL XL-5/W1:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jayakody A, Rupasinghe L, Perera KAMS, Herath HHPM, Thennakoon TMA, & Premanath SU (2013). The development of the CityGML GeoBIM extension for real-time assessable model (integration of BIM and GIS), PNCTM; VOL. 2, JAN 2013Google Scholar
  17. Kolbe TH (2009) Representing and exchanging 3D city models with CityGML. In: 3D geo-information sciences. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, pp 15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kolbe TH, Gröger G, & Plümer L (2005). CityGML–interoperable access to 3D city models. Geo-information for disaster management, 883–899Google Scholar
  19. Lee G, Sacks R, Eastman CM (2006) Specifying parametric building object behavior (BOB) for a building information modeling system. Autom Constr 15(6):758–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li Y, Dong K, Li GF (2014, November) The application of BIM in the restoration of historical buildings. In: Applied mechanics and materials, vol 638, pp 1627–1635Google Scholar
  21. Lorenzini M. (2009). Semantic approach to 3D historical reconstruction. In Proceedings of the 3rd ISPRS International Workshop 3D-ARCH 2009: “3D Virtual Reconstruction and Visualization of Complex Architectures” Trento, Italy, 25–28 February 2009Google Scholar
  22. Natekar D, Zhang X, Subbarayan G (2004) Constructive solid analysis: a hierarchical, geometry-based meshless analysis procedure for integrated design and analysis. Comput Aided Des 36(5):473–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mitra N, Pauly M, Wand M, Ceylan D (2013) Symmetry in 3D geometry: extraction and applications. Computer Graphics Forum 32(6):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Patias P, Grussenmeyer P, & Hanke K (2008). Applications in cultural heritage documentation. In Advances in photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences. 2008 ISPRS congress book (Vol. 7, pp. 363–384)Google Scholar
  25. Philippot P (1976). Historic preservation: philosophy, criteria, guidelines. Preservation and Conservation: principles and practices, 367–374Google Scholar
  26. Rodrigues JI, Figueiredo MJ, & Costa CP (2013). Web3DGIS for city models with CityGML and X3D. In Information Visualisation (IV), 2013 17th International Conference (pp 384–388). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  27. SCTA, 2013. Historic Jeddah, the gate to Makkah. Saudi Commission For Tourism And Antiquities, Saudi Arabia, Jeddah. Retrieved June 17, 2017, from http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1361
  28. Saygi G, Agugiaro G, Hamamcıoğlu-Turan M, Remondino F (2013) Evaluation of GIS and Bim roles for the information management of historical buildings. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 1(1):283–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sunkel M, Jansen S, Wand M, Eisemann E, Seidel H-P (2011). Learning line features in 3D geometry. In: Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. Eurographics). 1–10Google Scholar
  30. Sunkel M, Jansen S, Wand M, Seidel H-P (2013). A correlated parts model for object detection in large 3D scans. In: Computer Graphics Forum 32(2) (Proc. Eurographics), 1–10, 205, 214Google Scholar
  31. Tyler N, Ligibel TJ, & Tyler IR (2009). Historic preservation: an introduction to its history, principles, and practice. WW Norton & CompanyGoogle Scholar
  32. Wu TC, Lin YC, Hsu MF, Zheng NW, Chen WL (2013). Improving traditional building repair construction quality using historic building information modeling concept, International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XL-5/W2, XXIV International CIPA Symposium, 2–6 September 2013, Strasbourg, FranceGoogle Scholar
  33. Wüst T, Nebiker S, Landolt R (2004) Applying the 3D GIS DILAS to archaeology and cultural heritage projects requirements and first results. International Archives of Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 35(Part 5):407–412Google Scholar
  34. Yastikli N (2007) Documentation of cultural heritage using digital photogrammetry and laser scanning. J Cult Herit 8(4):423–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yilmaz HM, Yakar M, Gulec SA, Dulgerler ON (2007) Importance of digital close-range photogrammetry in documentation of cultural heritage. J Cult Herit 8(4):428–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fotogrammetria e Topografia (SIFET) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Geomatics and Surveying EngineeringIAV Hassan IIRabatMorocco
  2. 2.Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Environmental DesignKAU UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia
  3. 3.Department of Geomatics, Faculty of Environmental DesignKAU UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia
  4. 4.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringAswan UniversityAswanEgypt

Personalised recommendations