Advertisement

Applied Geomatics

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 569–578 | Cite as

Geomatics and augmented reality experiments for the cultural heritage

  • Vincenzo Barrile
  • Antonino Fotia
  • Giuliana Bilotta
Original Paper

Abstract

For years, the Laboratory of Geomatics of the Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria has undertaken an interdisciplinary project for the recovery and dissemination of information regarding the cultural-artistic and archeological heritage of the metropolitan area. The combined use of geomatics technologies (laser scanners, GPS positioning, digital photogrammetry, remote sensing, GPR) allows on the one hand to investigate objects and artifacts, providing metric, form, and location information; and on the other, to catalog information and make it accessible to the community. Indeed, the digitalization and reconstruction tools of 3D models can be the answer to the limits related to communicability in the archeological sector. Precision, detail, and very accurate photo-realistic reconstructions are particularly useful for virtual and augmented reality applications, integrating them in the devices used on a daily basis. The present note concerns, therefore, the acquisition of information using the point cloud from UAVs and laser scanners, the subsequent 3D modeling, and their representation in an augmented reality (AR) environment using mobile platforms. The application was tested on the church of Sant’Antonio Abate, located in the North of Reggio Calabria, which according to studies is the only evidence of medieval architecture in the territory of Reggio Calabria.

Keywords

Laser scanner 3D modeling UAV Archeological and historical structures Cultural heritage 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Rosa C. Ponterio, Institute for Chemical-Physical Processes of CNR – Messina, for the cooperation during field tests.

References

  1. Akca D, Gruen A (2007) Generalized least squares multiple 3D surface matching. Proc. of the ISPRS WS Laser Scanning 2007, vol. 36, Part 3 /W52, Espoo Finlandia, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  2. Bae H, Golparvar-Fard M, White J (2013) High-precision vision-based mobile augmented reality system for context-aware architectural, engineering, construction and facility management (AEC/FM) applications. Vis Eng 1(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bale K, Abbott D, Gowigati R, Pritchard D, Chapman P (2011) Linking evidence with heritage visualization using a large scale collaborative interface. VAST11 Int. Symp. on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Intelligent Cultural Heritage, pp 121–128Google Scholar
  4. Barazzetti L, Remondino F, Scaioni M (2010) Orientation and 3D modelling from markerless terrestrial images: combining accuracy with automation. Photogramm Rec 25(132):356–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrile V, Bilotta G (2014) Self-localization by laser scanner and GPS in automated surveys. Computational problems in engineering. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Springer 307:293–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrile V, Bilotta G, D’Amore E, Meduri GM, Trovato S (2016) Structural modeling of a historic castle using close range photogrammetry. Int J Math Comput Simul 10:370–380Google Scholar
  7. Barrile V, Meduri GM, Bilotta G (2011) Laser scanner technology for complex surveying structures. WSEAS Trans Signal Processing 7:65–74Google Scholar
  8. Barrile V, Meduri GM, Bilotta G (2014) Comparison between two methods for monitoring deformation with laser scanner. WSEAS Trans Signal Processing 10:497–503Google Scholar
  9. Barrile V, Bilotta G, Pozzoli A (2017) Comparison between innovative techniques of photogrammetry. ITM Web of Conferences 9:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cuca B, Brumana R, Scaioni M, Oreni D (2011) Spatial data management of temporal map series for cultural and environmental heritage. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, IJSDIR 6:1–31Google Scholar
  11. Drap P, Durand A, Nedir M, Seinturier J, Papini O, Boucault F, Chapman P, Viant W, Vannini G, Nuccioti M (2006) Towards a photogrammetry and virtual reality based heritage information system: a case study of Shawbak Castle Int. Symp. on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, VAST’2006, pp 67–74Google Scholar
  12. Forte M, Kurillo G (2010) Cyberarchaeology: experimenting with teleimmersive archaeology. In Virtual systems and multimedia (VSMM 2010), SeoulGoogle Scholar
  13. Fuchs P, Moreau G, Guitton P (2011) Virtual reality: concepts and technologies. CRC Press, Inc., Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  14. Kraus K (2007) Photogrammetry–geometry from images and laser scans. Walter de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. Monti C, Brumana R, Achille C, Fregonese L (2004) Per un moderno rilievo della basilica di San Lorenzo tra opera, progetto e trasformazioni. Silvana ed, Milan, pp 25–242Google Scholar
  16. Rinaudo F, Bornaz L, Ardissone P (2007) 3D high accuracy survey and modelling for Cultural Heritage Documentation and Restoration. Vast 2007–future technologies to empower heritage professionals, November 26–29, 2007, Brighton, UK, Archaeolingua Hun, pp 19–23Google Scholar
  17. Vergnieux R (2011) Archaeological research and 3D models (restitution, validation and simulation), in Virtual archeology review, Vol. 2, Num. 4, pp 39–43Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fotogrammetria e Topografia (SIFET) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DICEAM – Department of Civil Environmental Energetic and Material EngineeringUniversity “Mediterranea” of Reggio CalabriaReggio CalabriaItaly
  2. 2.Department of PlanningUniversity IUAV of VeniceVeniceItaly

Personalised recommendations