Advertisement

Fracture properties of sandstone degradation under the action of drying–wetting cycles in acid and alkaline environments

  • Hong Liang
  • Yan FuEmail author
Original Paper
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

In order to study the fracture properties of sandstone degradation under the action of drying–wetting cycles in acid and alkali environments, laboratory tests were conducted on the sandstone specimens for 1, 3, 6, and 10 drying–wetting cycles in neutral (pH = 7), acid (pH = 4), and alkali (pH = 9) environments, respectively. The semi-circular bend (SCB) specimens were selected for mode I fracture testing, and the Brazilian splitting specimens were adopted to measure the tensile strength of sandstone. The results show that the acid and alkaline environments have a great effect on the fracture properties of sandstone degradation that is the largest one in the acidic environment (pH = 4), followed by that in the alkaline environment (pH = 9) and that in the neutral environment (pH = 7). The degradation of tensile strength of the sandstone is less than that of fracture toughness, and the relationships between mode I fracture toughness and tensile strength of sandstone are linear after soaking in acid and alkali environments.

Keywords

Fracture toughness Drying–wetting cycles Degradation Sandstone 

Notes

Funding information

This work is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Project No.2019CDJSK03PT07), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 51308567), and the Youth Project of science and technology research program of Chongqing Education Commission of China (Project No. KJQN201800125).

References

  1. Lin ML, Jeng FS, Tsai LS et al (2005) Wetting weakening of tertiary sandstones-microscopic mechanism. Environ Geol 48:265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Sumner PD, Loubser MJ (2008) Experimental sandstone weathering using different wetting and drying moisture amplitudes. Earth Surf Proc Landforms 33:985–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ozbek A (2014) Investigation of the effects of wetting–drying and freezing–thawing cycles on some physical and mechanical properties of selected ignimbrites. Bull Engng Geol Environ 73:595–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Taibi S, Duperret A, Fleureau J-M (2009) The effect of suction on the hydro-mechanical behaviour of chalk rocks. Engng Geol 106:40–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Tang LS, Zhang PC, Wang SJ (2002) Testing study on effects of chemical action of aqueous solution on crack propagation in rock. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 21(6):822–827Google Scholar
  6. Karfakis MG, Akram M (1993) Effects of chemical solutions on rock fracturing. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci & Geomech 30:1253–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Yuan W, Liu XR, FU Y (2017a) Chemical thermodynamics and chemical kinetics analysis of sandstone dissolution under the action of dry-wet cycles in acid and alkaline environment. Bull Eng Geol Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1162-9, 78, 793, 801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Yuan W, Liu XR, FU Y (2017b) Study on degradation of strength parameters of sandstone under the action of dry-wet cycles in acid and alkaline environment. Arab J Sci Eng 43(1):335–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Torres-Suareza MC, Alarcon-Guzman A, Moya RB-D (2014) Effects of loading–unloading and wetting–drying cycles on geomechanical behaviors of mudrocks in the Colombian Andes. J Rock Mech Geotech Engng 6:257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hale PA, Shakoor A (2003) A laboratory investigation of the effects of cyclic heating and cooling, wetting and drying, and freezing and thawing on the compressive strength of selected sandstones. Environ Engng Geosci 9(2):117–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhou ZL, Cai X, Chen L et al (2017) Influence of cyclic wetting and drying on physical and dynamic compressive properties of sandstone. Eng Geol 220:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li N, Zhu YM, Su B, Gunter S (2003) A chemical damage model of sandstone in acid solution. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hua W, Dong S, Li Y et al (2015) The influence of cyclic wetting and drying on the fracture toughness of sandstone. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 78:331–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hua W, Dong S, Li Y et al (2016) Effect of cyclic wetting and drying on the pure mode II fracture toughness of sandstone. Eng Fract Mech 153:143–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ISRM (2007) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006. In: Ulusay R, Hudson JA (eds) Suggested methods prepared by the commission on testing methods, International Society for Rock Mechanics, compilation arranged by the ISRM Turkish National Group. Kozan Ofset, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuruppu MD, Obara Y, Ayatollahi MR et al (2014) ISRM-suggested method for determining the mode I static fracture toughness using semi-circular bend specimen. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:267–274Google Scholar
  17. Zhang ZX (2002) An empirical relation between mode I fracture toughness and the tensile strength of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(3):401–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang JJ, Zhu JG, Chiu CF et al (2007) Experimental study on fracture toughness and tensile strength of a clay. Eng Geol 94:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Architecture and Urban PlanningChongqing UniversityChongqingChina
  2. 2.School of Management Science and Real EstateChongqing UniversityChongqingChina
  3. 3.Center for Construction Ecnomics and ManagementChongqing UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations