Advertisement

Assessment of relative active tectonics in parts of Aravalli mountain range, India: implication of geomorphic indices, remote sensing, and GIS

  • Syed Ahmad AliEmail author
  • Javed Ikbal
Original Paper
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

Udaipur is located in the southern front of NE-SW oriented Aravalli hills. The area is dissected by several active fault/lineaments. To access the tectonic scenario, we have used a widely used conventional geomorphic indices such as stream length-gradient index (SL), asymmetry factor (Af), basin shape (Bs), valley floor width to valley height ratio (Vf), mountain front sinuosity (Smf), hypsometric integral (Hi), hypsometric curve, and transverse topographic symmetry factor (T) to analyze relative index of active tectonics (RIAT) of the Ahar watershed. Results of these geomorphic indices of each sub-watersheds are used to divide area from low to high tectonic activity classes. The results of relative index of active tectonic (RIAT) distribution pattern shows that the sub-watershed UDSW2, 3, and 4 is tectonically relatively more tectonically active than the other parts of the study area. The estimated results of RIAT distribution are well supported by the geomorphic evidences. The combined results of geomorphic evidences such as stream deflection and analysis of lineament and geomorphic indices reveal that the Ahar watershed of Udaipur district is most affected by tectonic activity.

Keywords

Geomorphic indices Relative active tectonics Stream deflection Lineament Aravalli mountain range 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Chairman of department of Geology for providing lab facilities during the study. One of the author (JI) is thankful to MHRD, Govt. of India for providing UGC-MANF fellowship during the study. The authors thankfully acknowledge the reviewers for critically reviewing the manuscript to give a shape of the paper to publish in this reputed journal.

References

  1. Ahmad S, Bhat MI (2013) Investigating drainage response to the Balapur fault interaction on the north eastern Pir Panjal flank, Kashmir valley, India. J Himalayan Ecol Sustain Dev 8:121–137Google Scholar
  2. Aldharab HS, Ali SA, Ikbal J, Ghareb S (2018a) GIS and hypsometry based analysis on the evolution of sub-basins in Ataq area-Shabwah, Yemen. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol 6:3489–3497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldharab HS, Ali SA, Ikbal J, Ghareb S (2018b) Spatial analysis of lineament and their tectonic significance using Landsat imagery in Alarasah area- southeastern Central Yemen. J Geogr Environ Earth Sci Int 18(2):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ali SA, Ali U (2017) Evaluating linear geological structures in seismogenic compressional setting, Kashmir basin, NW-Himalaya. Spat Inf Res 25(6):801–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ali U, Ali SA (2018) Seismically induced soft-sediment deformation structures in an active seismogenic setting: the Plio-Pleistocene Karewa deposits, Kashmir Basin (NW Himalaya). J Struct Geol 115:28–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ali SA, Ikbal J, Ali U, Aldharab HS (2017) Measurement of watershed geometry in the central part of Udaipur sector, Rajasthan using remote sensing and GIS. Int J Rec Sci Res 8(11):21786–21791Google Scholar
  7. Azor A, Keller EA (2002) Yeats, R.S. geomorphic indicators of active fold growth: oak ridge anticline, Ventura basin, southern California. GSA Bull 114:745–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bakliwal PC, Ramasamy SM (1987) Lineament fabric of Rajasthan and Gujarat. Geol Surv India 113(7):54–64Google Scholar
  9. Bali BS, Wani AF, Khan RA, Ahmad S (2016) Morphotectonic analysis of the Madhumati watershed, Northeast Kashmir Valley. Arab J Geosci 9:390–317.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2395-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bathrellos GD, Antoniou VE, Skilodimou HD (2009) Morphotectonic characteristics of Lefkas Island during the quaternary (Ionian Sea, Greece). Geol Balcanica 38:23–33Google Scholar
  11. Bhattacharya F, Rastogi BK, Kothyari G (2013) Morphometric evidence of seismicity around the Wagad and Gedi faults, eastern Kachchh, Gujarat , India. J Geol Soc India 81:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bhu H, Purohit R, Ram J, Sharma P, Jakhar SR (2014) Neotectonic activity and parity in movements of Udaipur block of the Arvalli Craton and Indian plate. J Earth Syst Sci 123(2):343–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bull PA (1977) Glacial deposits identified by chattermark trails in detrital garnets - comment. Geology 5:248–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bull WB (1978) Geomorphic tectonic classes of the south front of the San Gabriel Mountains, California. U.S. Geological Survey Contract Report, 14–08-001-G-394, Office of Earthquakes, Volcanoes and Engineering, Menlo Park, Calif, 59Google Scholar
  15. Bull WB (2007) Tectonic geomorphology of mountains: a new approach to Paleoseismology, vol 328. Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bull W, McFadden L (1977) Tectonic geomorphology north and south of the Garlock fault, California. In: Doehring DO (ed) Geomorphology in arid regions. State University of New York at Bingamton, Geomorphology, pp 115–138Google Scholar
  17. Burbank DW, Anderson RS (2001) Tectonic geomorphology, vol 247. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Casas AM, Cortes AL, Maestro A, Soriano MA, Riaguas A, Bernal JA (2000) Program for lineament length and density analysis. Comput Geosci 26(9/10):1011–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen YC, Sung QC, Cheng KY (2003) Along-strike variations of morphotectonic features in the western foothills of Taiwan: tectonic implications based on stream gradient and hypsometric analysis. Geomorphology 56:109–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chowksey V, Maurya DM, Joshi J, Khonde N, Das A, Chamyal LS (2011) Lithostratigraphic development and neotectonic significance of the quaternary sediments along the Kachchh mainland fault (KMF) zone, Western India. J Earth Syst Sci 120(6):979–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cox RT (1994) Analysis of drainage basin symmetry as a rapid technique to identify areas of possible quaternary tilt block tectonics: an example from the Mississippi embayment. Geol Soc Am Bull 106:571–581.  https://doi.org/10.1130/00167606(1994)106<0571:AODBSA>2.3.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cox RT, Van Arsdale RB, Harris JB (2001) Identification of possible quaternary deformation in the northwestern Mississippi embayment using quantitative geomorphic analysis of drainage basin asymmetry. Geol Soc Am Bull 113:615–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Das AR (1988) Geometry of superposed deformation in the Delhi Supergroup of rocks of the area around Bhabru Manoharpura, district Jaipur, Rajasthan. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, 116Google Scholar
  24. Dassarma DC (1988) Post-orogenic deformation of the Precambrian crust in Northeast Rajasthan. In: Roy AB (ed) Precambrian of Aravalli mountain, Rajasthan, India, Mem. Geol. Soc. India, vol 7, pp 109–120Google Scholar
  25. Deffontaines B, Chorowich J (1991) Principle of drainage basin analysis from multisource data: application to the structural analysis of the Zaire basin. Tectonophysics 194:237–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Demoulin A (1998) Testing the tectonic significance of some parameters of longitudinal river profiles: the case of the Ardenne (Belgium, NW Europe). Geomorphology 24(2):189–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dubey RK, Dar JA, Kothyari GC (2017) Evaluation of relative tectonic perturbations of the Kashmir basin, northwest Himalaya, India: an integrated morphological approach. J Asian Earth Sci 148:153–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dumka RK, Chopra S, Prajapati S (2019) GPS derived crustal deformation analysis of Kachchh, zone of 2001(M7.7) earthquake, Western India. Quat Int.  https://doi.org/10.1016/jquaint.2019.01.032
  29. El Hamdouni R, Irigaray C, Fernández T, Chacón J, Keller EA (2008) Assessment of relative active tectonics, southwest border of Sierra Nevada (southern Spain). Geomorphology 96:150–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Elias Z (2015) The neotectonic activity along the lower Khazir River by using SRTM image and geomorphic indices. Earth Sci 1(1):50–58.  https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20150401.15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gaidzik K, Ramírez-Herrera MT (2017) Geomorphic indices and relative tectonic uplift in the Guerrero sector of the Mexican forearc. Geosci Front 8:885–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ghosh TK, Viswanathan S, Suval B (1991) Neotectonic analysis of Medha river basin, Rajasthan, India. Int. jour. Remote Sens 12:2585–2595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hack JT (1973) Stream-profiles analysis and stream-gradient index. Journal of research of the U.S. Geol Survey 1(4):421–429Google Scholar
  34. Hare PW, Gardner TW (1985) Geomorphic indicators of vertical neotectonism along converging plate margins, Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica. In Tectonic Geomorphology, Morisawa, M., Hack, J.T., Eds.; Proceedings of the 15th Annual Binghamton Geomorphology Symposium. Allen and Unwin, Boston, 123–134Google Scholar
  35. Heron AM (1936) The geology of south eastern Mewar. Mem Geol Surv India 68(1):1–120Google Scholar
  36. Huang XJ, Niemann JD (2006) Modelling the potential impacts of groundwater hydrology on long-term drainage basin evolution. Earth Surf Process Landf 31:1802–1823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ikbal J (2018) Structural and tectonic study of Aravalli Supergroup in the central part of Udaipur sector, Rajasthan using geological and geospatial techniques. Doctoral thesis, Aligarh Muslim universityGoogle Scholar
  38. Ikbal J, Ali SA (2017) Site selection for soil conservation by geometric analysis of watershed, southeastern part of Aravalli mountain range using remote sensing and GIS. Int J Sci Res Sci Technol 8:369–378Google Scholar
  39. Ikbal J, Ali SA, Aldharab H (2017) Morphological character of micro watershed of Katla river in Udaipur district, Rajasthan. Int J Curr Res 9(9):57708–57715Google Scholar
  40. Joshi PN, Maurya M, Chamyal LS (2013) Morphotectonic segmentation and spatial variability of neotectonic activity along the Narmada–son fault, Western India: remote sensing and GIS analysis. Geomorphology 180-181:292–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kamberis E, Bathrellos GD, Kokinou E, Skilodimou HD (2012) Correlation between the structural pattern and the development of the hydrographic network in a portion of the Western Thessaly Basin (Greece). Cent Euro J Geosci 4(3):416–424Google Scholar
  42. Kassou A, Essahlaoui A, Aissa M (2012) Extraction of Structural Lineaments from Satellite Images Landsat7 ETM+ of Tighza Mining District (Central Morocco) Research. J Earth Sci 4(2):44–48Google Scholar
  43. Kele VS, Sengupta S, Achyuthan H, Jaiswal MK (2014) Tectonic controls upon Kaveri River drainage, cratonic peninsular India: inferences from longitudinal profiles, morphotectonic indices, hanging valley and fluvial records. Geomorphology 227:153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Keller EA (1986) Investigation of active tectonics: use of surficial Earth processes. In: Wallace RE (ed) Active Tectonics, Studies in Geophysics. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 136–147Google Scholar
  45. Keller EA, Pinter N (1996) Active tectonics: earthquakes, uplift, and landscape. Prentice hall, Inc, New Jersey, pp 121–205Google Scholar
  46. Kothyari GC (2015) Morphometric analysis of tectonically active Pindar and Saryu river basins: central Kumaun Himalaya. Z Geomorphol 59(4):421–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kothyari GC, Dumka RK, Singh AP, Chauhan G, Thakkar MG, Biswas SK (2016a) Tectonic evolution and stress pattern of south Wagad fault at the Kachchh Rift Basin in western India. Geol Mag.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756816000509 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kothyari GC, Shukla AD, Juyal N (2016b) Reconstruction of Late Quaternary climate and seismicity using fluvial landforms in Pindar River valley, central Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India. Quat Int xxx:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2016.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kothyari GC, Rastogi BK, Morthekai P, Dumka RK (2016c) Active segmentation assessment of the tectonically active south Wagad fault in Kachchh, Western peninsular India. Geomorphology 253:491–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mahmood SA, Gloaguen R (2012) Appraisal of active tectonics in Hindu Kush: insights from DEM derived geomorphic indices and drainage analysis. Geosci Front 3(4):407–428.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2011.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Malik JN, Mohanty C (2007) Active tectonic influence on the evolution of drainage and landscape: geomorphic signatures from frontal and hinterland areas along the northwestern Himalaya, India. J Asian Earth Sci 29:604–618.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2006.03.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Malik JN, Nakata T (2003) Active faults and related and late quaternary deformation along the northwestern Himalayan frontal zone, India. Ann Geophys 46(5):917–936Google Scholar
  53. Mathew G, Singhvi AK, Karanth RV (2006) Luminescence chronometry and geomorphic evidence of active fold growth along the Kachchh mainland fault (KMF), Kachchh, India: Seismotectonic implications. Tectonophys 422:71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Matsuda T (1966) Strike-slip faulting along the Atotsugawa fault, Japan. Bull Earthq Res Instit 44:1179–1212Google Scholar
  55. Matsuda T (1975) Active fault assessment for Irozaki fault system, Izu Peninsula. In: Tsuchi R (ed) Reports on the earthquake of Izu peninsula, 1974, and the disaster. The Ministry of Education, Tokyo, pp 121–125Google Scholar
  56. Maurya DM, Chouksey V, Joshi PN, Chamyal LS (2013) Application of GPR for delineating the neotectonic setting and shallow subsurface nature of the seismically active Gedi fault, Kachchh, western India. J Geophys Eng 10:034006.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/10/3/034006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McElfresh SBZ, Harbert W, Ku CY (2002) Lin, J.S. stress modeling of tectonic blocks at Cape Kamchatka, Russia using principal stress proxies from high-resolution SAR: new evidence for the Komandorskiy block. Tectonophysics 354:239–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moglen GE, Bras RL (1995) The effect of spatial heterogeneities on geomorphic expression in a model of basin evolution. Water Resour Res 31:2613–2623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Molin P, Pazzaglia FJ, Dramis F (2004) Geomorphic expression of active tectonics in a rapidly-deforming forearc, Sila massif, Calabria, southern Italy. Am J Sci 304(7):559–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Özkaymak Ç (2015) Tectonic analysis of the Honaz fault (western Anatolia) using geomorphic indices and the regional implications. Geodin Acta 27(2–3):110–129.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09853111.2014.957504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Patidar AK, Maurya DM, Thakkar MG, Chamyal LS (2008) Evidence of neotectonic reactivation of the Katrol Hill fault during late quaternary and its GPR characterization. Curr Sci 94:338–346Google Scholar
  62. Pedrera A, Galindo‐Zaldívar J, Ruíz‐Constan A, Duque C, Marín‐Lechado C, Serrano I (2009) Recent large fold nucleation in the upper crust: Insight from gravity, magnetic, magnetotelluric and seismicity data (Sierra de Los Filabres‐Sierra de Las Estancias, Internal Zones, Betic Cordillera). Tectonophysics 463:145–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2008.09.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pike RJ, Wilson SE (1971) Elevation-relief ratio, hypsometric integral, and geomorphic area-altitude analysis. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 82(4):1079–1084.  https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1971)82[1079:ERHIAG]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Prizomwala SP, Solanki T, Chauhan G, Das A, Bhatt N, Thakkar MG, Rastogi BK (2016) Spatial variations in tectonic activity along the Kachchh mainland fault, Kachchh, western India: implications in seismic hazard assessment. Nat Hazards 82:947–961.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2228-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rajendran CP, Rajendran K, Thakkar M, Goyal B (2008) Assessing the previous activity at the source zone of the 2001 Bhuj earthquake based on the near-source and distant paleo-seismological indicators. J Geophys Res 113:B05311.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004845 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Riquelmea R, Martinod J, Herail G, Darrozesa J, Charrierb RA (2003) Geomorphological approach to determining the Neogene to recent tectonic deformation in the coastal cordillera of northern Chile (Atacama). Tectonophysics 361:255–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rockwell TK, Keller EA, Johnson DL (1985) Tectonic geomorphology of alluvial fans and mountain fronts near Ventura, California. In Tectonic Geomorphology, Morisawa, M., Eds.; Proceedings of the 15th Annual Geomorphology Symposium. Allen and Unwin Publishers, Boston, MA, 183–207Google Scholar
  68. Roy AB, Jakhar SR (2002) Geology of Rajasthan (Northwest India) Precambrian to recent, vol 349. Scientific publishers, JodhpurGoogle Scholar
  69. Saifuddin I (2000) Thrust controlled lineaments of the Aravalli-Delhi fold belt, Rajasthan, India mapped from Landsat TM image. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 28:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sareen BK, Tandon SK, Bhola AM (1993) Slope-deviatory alignment, stream network and lineament orientation of the Sabarmati River system—neotectonic activity in the mid-to late quaternary. Curr Sci 64:827–836Google Scholar
  71. Schumm SA (1977) The fluvial system, vol 338. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  72. Siddiqui S (2014) Appraisal of active deformation using DEM-based morphometric indices analysis in Emilia-Romagna Apennines, Northern Italy. Geodyn Res Int Bull 1(3):XXXIV–XXLIIGoogle Scholar
  73. Silva PG, Goy JL, Zazo C, Bardaji T (2003) Fault generated mountain fronts in south-east Spain: Geomorphologic assessment of tectonic and seismic activity. Geomorphology 50:203–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00215-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sinha-Roy S (1986) Himalayan collision and indentation of Aravalli orogen by Bundelkhand wedge: implication for Neotectonics in Rajasthan. Proc international symposium on Neotectonics in South Asia, Dehradun, India. 18-21Google Scholar
  75. Strahler AN (1952) Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topology. Geol Soc Am Bull 63(11):1117–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Toudeshki VH, Arian M (2011) Morphotectonic analysis in the Ghezel Ozan River basin, NW Iran. J Geogr Geol 3:258–260Google Scholar
  77. Whipple KX, Di-Biase RA, Crosby BT (2013) Bedrock Rivers. Treat Geomorphol 9:550–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Whittaker AC (2012) How do landscapes record tectonics and climate? Lithosphere 4:160–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Willgoose HG (1998) Revisiting the hypsometric curve as an indicator of form and process in transport-limited catchment. Earth Surf Process Landf 23:611–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeologyAligarh Muslim UniversityAligarhIndia

Personalised recommendations