Advertisement

Experimental study of nonlinear damping characteristics on granite and red sandstone under the multi-level cyclic loading-unloading triaxial compression

  • Beibei Yang
  • Mingming HeEmail author
  • Yunsheng Chen
Original Paper
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Damping is an important dynamic characteristic of rock masses and has an important impact on seismic engineering. In this paper, a multi-level cyclic loading-unloading triaxial compression experiment was conducted on granite and red sandstone under different confining pressures with two stress paths: one with different amplitudes and the other with the same amplitude. The effects of the two stress paths on the damping ratio, damping coefficient, and elastic modulus evolution characteristics under different confining pressures were studied. The damping parameters and dynamic elastic modulus of the two types of rock under different confining pressures were calculated, and the variation in the damping parameters with the stress level and strain level was determined. The linear interrelation of the damping ratio, damping coefficient, and dynamic elastic modulus was explored. The results show that the damping coefficients of the red sandstone and granite can be expressed as a linear function of the dynamic elastic modulus. The dynamic elastic moduli of the red sandstone and granite increased with increasing strain ratios and stress ratios. Under the variable-amplitude stress path, the dynamic elastic modulus growth rate of the red sandstone was approximately 60% of that of the granite. Under the fixed-amplitude stress path, the dynamic elastic modulus growth rate of the red sandstone was approximately 20% of that of the granite.

Keywords

Granite Red sandstone Damping ratio Damping coefficient Dynamic elastic modulus 

Notes

Funding information

This study is sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 11902249) and the Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (2019JQ-395).

References

  1. Brennan BJ (1980) Pulse propagation in media with frequency-dependent Q. Geophys Res Lett 7:211–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brennan BJ, Stacey FD (1977) Frequency dependence of elasticity of rock—test of seismic velocity dispersion. Nature 268:220–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brian JM (1991) Frequency dependence of QLg and its relation to crustal anelasticity in the Basin and Range Province. Geophys Res lett 18:621–624Google Scholar
  4. Brunner WM, Spetzler HA (2002) Contaminant-induced mechanical damping in partially saturated Berea sandstone. Geophys Res Lett 29:11–1–11-4.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015455 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cammarano F, Romanowicz B (2008) Radial profiles of seismic attenuation in the upper mantle based on physical models. Geophys J Int 175:116–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper RF (2002) Seismic wave attenuation: energy dissipation in viscoelastic crystalline solids. Rev Mineral Geochem 51:253–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dai JH, Lu YX, Sun B (2016) Experimental study on rock damage under cyclic loading. Water Con Hyd Tech 10:102–105Google Scholar
  8. Dalton CA, Ekström G, Dziewonski AM (2009) Global seismological shear velocity and attenuation: a comparison with experimental observations. Earth Planet Sci Lett 284:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fairhurst CE, Hudson JA, (1999) Draft ISRM Suggested method for the complete stress-strain curve for intact rock in uniaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36(3):281–289Google Scholar
  10. Fu XM, Xiong H, Wang CY, Han WX (2015) Experimental study about the deformation and damping characteristics of rock under triaxial cyclic loading. China Meas Test 41(02):1674–5124Google Scholar
  11. Gribb TT, Cooper RF (1998) Low-frequency shear attenuation in polycrystalline olivine: grain boundary diffusion and the physical significance of the Andrade model for viscoelastic rheology. J Geophys Res 103:27267–27279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guo MQ, Fu LY (2007) Stress associated coda attenuation from ultrasonic waveform measurements. Geophys Res Lett 34:L09307.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029582 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gurevich B, Lopatnikov SL (1995) Velocity and attenuation of elastic waves in finely layered porous rocks. Geophys J Int 121:933–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hara A, Kiyota Y (1977) Dynamic shear tests of soils for seismic analyses. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Tokyo 2:247–250Google Scholar
  15. He MM, Li N, Chen YS, Zhu CH (2017) Damping ratio and damping coefficient of rock under different cyclic loading conditions. Rock Soil Mech 38(09):2531–2538Google Scholar
  16. He MM, Huang B, Li N, Zhu CH, Chen YS (2018) Energy dissipation-based method for fatigue life prediction of rock salt. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51:1447–1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. He MM, Li N, Zhu CH, Chen YS, Wu H (2019a) Experimental investigation and damage modeling of salt rock subjected to fatigue loading. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 114:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. He MM, Chen YS, Li N (2019b) Laboratory measurements of the mechanical damping capacities in partially saturated sandstone. Arab J Geosci 12(14):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang LX (1987) Experimental study and determination of damping properties of rock materials. Surv Sci Technol 6:35–39Google Scholar
  20. Huang XJ, Fu XM, Shen Z (2016) Study on dynamic parameters of rock under triaxial cyclic loading. China Test 42(07):117–122Google Scholar
  21. Jackson I, Faul UH (2010) Grainsize-sensitive viscoelastic relaxation in olivine: towards a robust laboratory-based model for seismological application. Phys Earth Planet Inter 183:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jackson I, Faul UH, Fitz Gerald JD, Morris SJS (2010) Contrasting viscoelastic behavior of melt-free and melt-bearing olivine: Implications for the nature of grain-boundary sliding. Mater Sci Eng A 442:170–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Julien B, Clarisse B, Daniel B, Pascale S, Perroud H (2012) Laboratory monitoring of P waves in partially saturated sand. Geophys J Int 191:1152–1170Google Scholar
  24. Kim DS, Stokoe KH, Roesset JM (1991) Characterization of material damping of soils using resonant column and torsional shear tests. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference, Soil Dyn Earthq Eng Karlsruhe 189-200Google Scholar
  25. Kokusho T (1987) In-situ dynamic soil properties and their evaluation. Proceedings of the Eighth Asian Regional Conference Soil Mech and FoundationEngineering 2:215–240Google Scholar
  26. Leary PC (1995) The cause of frequency-dependent seismic absorption in crustal rock. Geophys J Int 122:143–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu E, He S (2012) Effects of cyclic dynamic loading on the mechanical properties of intact rock samples under confining pressure conditions. Eng Geol 125:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu JF, Xie HP, Xu J (2008) Experimental study on damping characteristics of rock under cyclic loading. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 27(4):712–717Google Scholar
  29. Mikhaltsevitch V, Lebedev M, Gurevich B (2016) Validation of the laboratory measurements at seismic frequencies using the Kramers-Kronig relationship. Geophys Res Lett 43:4986–4991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Müller TM, Lambert G, Gurevich B (2007) Dynamic permeability of porous rocks and its seismic signatures. Geophysics 72:E149–E158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Müller TM, Toms-Stewart J, Wenzlau F (2008) Velocity-saturation relation for partially saturated rocks with fractal pore fluid distribution. Geophys Res Lett 35:L09306.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL033074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nishi K, Ishiguro T, Kudo K (1989) Dynamic properties of weatheredsedimentary soft rocks. Soils Found 29:67–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nishi K, Kokusho T, Esashi Y (1983) Dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio of rocks for a wide confining pressure range. Proceedings of the Fifth Congress International Society for Rock Mechanics, Melbourne 2:223–226Google Scholar
  34. Oreshin SI, Vinnik LP (2004) Heterogeneity and anisotropy of seismic attenuation in the inner core. Geophys Res Lett 31:L02613.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018591 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Phillips WS, Richard J (2008) Stead attenuation of Lg in the western US using the USArray. Geophys Res Lett 35:L07307.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032926 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pointer T, Liu E, Hudson JA (2000) Seismic wave propagation in cracked porous media. Geophys J Int 142:199–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pride SR, Berryman JG, Harris JM (2004) Seismic attenuation due to wave-induced flow. J Geophys Res 109:B01201.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JB002639 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ren HN, Xu J (2011) Experimental study on damping parameters of marble under triaxial cyclic loading. J Yan River Sci Res Inst 28(11):72–76Google Scholar
  39. Robert JMF, Jackson I, John DFG, Ulrich HF, Mark EZ (2012) Dislocation damping and anisotropic seismic wave attenuation in Earth’s upper mantle. Science 336:332–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rubino JG, Holliger K (2012) Seismic attenuation and velocity dispersion in heterogeneous partially saturated porous rocks. Geophys J Int 188:1088–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rubino JG, Ravazzoli CL, Santos JE (2009) Equivalent viscoelastic solids for heterogeneous fluid-saturated porous rocks. Geophysics 74:N1–N13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rubino JG, Velis DR, Sacchi MD (2011a) Numerical analysis of wave-induced fluid flow effects on seismic data: application to monitoring of CO2 storage at the Sleipner field. J Geophys Res 116:B03306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rubino JG, Danilo RV, Mauricio DS (2011b) Numerical analysis of wave-induced fluid flow effects on seismic data: application to monitoring of CO2 storage at the Sleipner field. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 116(3).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB007997
  44. Rubino G, Guarracino L, Muller TM, Holliger K (2013a) Do seismic waves sense fracture connectivity? Geophys Res Lett 40(4):692–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rubino JG, Leonardo BM, Tobias MM, Guarracino L, Holliger K (2013b) Seismic wave attenuation and dispersion due to wave-induced fluid flow in rocks with strong permeability fluctuations. J Acoust Soc Am 134(6):42–47Google Scholar
  46. Saltiel S, Bonner, BP. Ajo-Franklin, JB (2017) Strain-dependent partialslip on rock fractures under seismic-frequency torsion. Geophys Reslett 44:4756–4764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tan BH, Jackson I, Fitz Gerald JD (2001) High-temperature viscoelasticity of fine-grained polycrystalline olivine. Phys Chem Miner 28:641–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tatsuoka F, Shibuya S (1992) Deformation characteristics of soils and rocks from field and laboratory tests. Report of the Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo, vol 235, p 136Google Scholar
  49. Tittmann BR, Nadler H, Clark VA, Ahlberg LA, Spencer TW (1981) Frequency dependence of seismic dissipation in saturated rocks. Geophys Res Lett 8:36–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tompkins MJ, Christensen NI (2001) Ultrasonic P- and S-wave attenuation in oceanic basalt. Geophys J Int 145:172–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Toms-Stewart J, Müller TM, Gurevich B, Paterson L (2009) Statistical characterization of gas-patch distributions in partially saturated rocks. Geophysics 74:WA51–WA64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vernon FC, Li X (1998) Seismic attenuation of the inner core: viscoelastic or stratigraphic? Geophys Res Lett 25:4019–4024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vinci C, Renner J, Steeb H (2014) On attenuation of seismic wavesassociated with flow in fractures. Geophys Res Lett 41:7515–7523.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061634 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang JP, Li YS, Zhang C (2015) Experimental study on the mechanical behavior of soft rock under cyclic loading. Sci Technol Eng 15(29):183–188Google Scholar
  55. Xiao JQ, Feng XT, Ding DX (2010) Study on the hysteresis and damping effect of rock under constant cyclic loading. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 29(8):1677–1683Google Scholar
  56. Xie DY (1988) Soil dynamics. Xi'an Jiaotong University Press, Xi'anGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhu ZD, Sun LZ, Wang MY (2010) Damping ratio experiment and mesomechanical analysis of deformation failure mechanism on rock under different frequency cyclic loadings. Rock Soil Mech 31(s1): 8-12Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid RegionXi’an University of TechnologyXi’anChina
  2. 2.Institute of Geotechnical EngineeringXi’an University of TechnologyXi’anChina
  3. 3.Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Loess Mechanics and EngineeringXi’an University of TechnologyXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations